Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

No new measures in England before New Year

660 replies

Jourdain11 · 27/12/2021 16:48

Has just been announced by the Health Secretary and reported across BBC etc.

OP posts:
theemperorhasnoclothes · 27/12/2021 17:19

The fact is, enough people I think will stay away to the point many business may struggle regardless.

LesLavandes · 27/12/2021 17:19

I don't know if this is a good idea. Let's see

rrhuth · 27/12/2021 17:19

And also on affording it - Brexit is going to cost many times more than the entire cost of covid - there is so much money available for political priorities, as well as for crony contracts.

rrhuth · 27/12/2021 17:20

@curlymom

Not ideal. Go mixing and evaluate just before schools reopen. Children will be the ones who ultimately suffer for the sake of New Years parties
haha quite - schools are the top priority... after everything else!
JanglyBeads · 27/12/2021 17:21

@the80sweregreat

The government obviously feel that things can tick along now till next weekend in England Either the devolved governments will look too cautious and wrong to do what they are doing , or it'll go wrong in England and Boris Johnson will be seen not to be doing enough and it'll be carnage. Among people I know many are against further restrictions, get on with it all is the general opinion and people just want it to go away I'm not sure , the NHS must be exhausted and many are off in isolation too :( Not sure what to think ?
No, the government are scared of their backbenchers and party sponsors.
Jourdain11 · 27/12/2021 17:21

Maybe the overall view from analysts is that further restrictions are not required, or strongly indicating that?

OP posts:
Ihopeyourcakeisshit · 27/12/2021 17:22

Are teaching unions likely to want restrictions when term starts agian?

theemperorhasnoclothes · 27/12/2021 17:22

@rrhuth

And also on affording it - Brexit is going to cost many times more than the entire cost of covid - there is so much money available for political priorities, as well as for crony contracts.
Excellent points.

'Affording it' only gets trotted out when it's something they don't want to do.

It was obvious the cost of brexit was going to be huge. Has anyone else noticed how much more their weekly food shop costs? How businesses are coping with these costs, as well as the shortages, I don't know.

JanglyBeads · 27/12/2021 17:22

The government have said many times recently that they make the decisions, not the scientists

the80sweregreat · 27/12/2021 17:22

@rrhuth

And also on affording it - Brexit is going to cost many times more than the entire cost of covid - there is so much money available for political priorities, as well as for crony contracts.
Totally agree
JanglyBeads · 27/12/2021 17:22

@Ihopeyourcakeisshit

Are teaching unions likely to want restrictions when term starts agian?
Yes, but they're unlikely to get them, sadly.
the80sweregreat · 27/12/2021 17:23

I've no doubt that Rishi sunak couldn't give a monkeys about hospitality now.
Big businesses such as the supermarkets haven't taken a hit , many other big retail companies are still trading , as long as that all goes on then they are happy.
He warned parliament about the cost of the booster programme etc , he just wants the money rolling in. I do understand why , the NHS wouldn't exist without a strong economy and he has to cave in to the devolved governments last weekend with money too, but it's still a gamble with people's health too. The stats must be holding up to do this.
People won't care now too.
Testing might go on the back burners too
I think people just want to get on with it now.
Have to see what happens now.

KerryLopez123 · 27/12/2021 17:24

lockdown again!!

Ihopeyourcakeisshit · 27/12/2021 17:24

Totally agree that today's decision was based on political strategy.

toomuchlaundry · 27/12/2021 17:24

Bet Boris didn’t want to cancel NY. Might be carnage in schools the following week. Fingers crossed it will work out. Not sure it is a good idea relying on people’s common sense, as that hasn’t worked in the past

MarshaBradyo · 27/12/2021 17:25

@the80sweregreat

I've no doubt that Rishi sunak couldn't give a monkeys about hospitality now. Big businesses such as the supermarkets haven't taken a hit , many other big retail companies are still trading , as long as that all goes on then they are happy. He warned parliament about the cost of the booster programme etc , he just wants the money rolling in. I do understand why , the NHS wouldn't exist without a strong economy and he has to cave in to the devolved governments last weekend with money too, but it's still a gamble with people's health too. The stats must be holding up to do this. People won't care now too. Testing might go on the back burners too I think people just want to get on with it now. Have to see what happens now.
Demand has dropped which has cost another £1bn in support recently

So yes it has been expensive so far

RoseRedRoseBlue · 27/12/2021 17:27

I think we are all going to pay for this decision come January ☹️

the80sweregreat · 27/12/2021 17:30

@RoseRedRoseBlue

I think we are all going to pay for this decision come January ☹️
We might not though ? This is what they have to weigh up I agree it's a political decision though.
rrhuth · 27/12/2021 17:30

@Jourdain11

Maybe the overall view from analysts is that further restrictions are not required, or strongly indicating that?
Hmm, not sure about 'analysts' but Graham Brady doesn't think restrictions are required. Advisors have been pretty clear so far.

Also - why would Scotland/Wales/NI follow one course and England not if the advice from advisors was that restrictions were not needed?

The difference is that Johnson's position depends on appeasing the thick twats right wing of his party.

Waxonwaxoff0 · 27/12/2021 17:30

Great news. Hopefully no restrictions ever again!

humdingle · 27/12/2021 17:31

It's a good decision and I hope the government continues to hold its nerve. We can't keep restricting people for an illness with an almost 100% survival rate. If you're scared, you should be the one to stay at home. Let the rest of us live normal lives.

the80sweregreat · 27/12/2021 17:32

Oh yes,this is a political decision , nothing to do with people's health
Many are capable of common sense and doing the right things , but many don't care at all and this is just a big gamble , let the people have Christmas and new year and fingers crossed it might be ok in January
It might be or it might not ?
We have been warned about tsunami's and tidal waves etc ( even Johnson said that Omnicron isn't be necessarily mild) but obviously money trumps everything too and he knows that another lockdown is very unpopular
too.

Mickarooni · 27/12/2021 17:32

I’m glad there are no announcements but I worry the “please be cautious” will have a massive impact on hospitality as it did prior to Christmas.

the80sweregreat · 27/12/2021 17:34

I've no doubt that hospitality will suffer :(
As I said below , Sunak doesn't care because he won't be paying anyone's wages.

TheScenicWay · 27/12/2021 17:35

@humdingle

It's a good decision and I hope the government continues to hold its nerve. We can't keep restricting people for an illness with an almost 100% survival rate. If you're scared, you should be the one to stay at home. Let the rest of us live normal lives.
Agree.