If vaccine protection wanes, you could argue high rates now, while vaccine protection is still sufficient to avoid severe disease in most people, is a good thing
Well, yes, and if I thought this was the peak then I'd agree. But my worry is that cases will now continue to rise sharply now kids are going back to school, with no mitigation, no vaccination for 12-15 year olds and a more contagious strain than last year. Like what appears to have happened in Scotland. As if so, we'll be looking at a winter peak nearly a year after the most vulnerable were vaccinated, when immunity is likely to have waned somewhat.
I just wish the government would be more decisive for once, and actually implement measures (eg booster jabs) BEFORE the shit starts to hit the fan. They just dither and dither like they have all the time in the world, but they don't.
Booster jabs for the vulnerable: Yep - appear to be needed. Dither dither (oh, and cut costs by giving the flu vaccine at the same time, even though that's contrary to guidance in the Green Book)
Jabs for 12-15 year olds? Yes - good idea, let's do it. Actually, let's not, could be tricky as well as the boosters. Oh shit - now schools are back rates and hospitalisations are not looking good again - let's now offer 12-15's jabs/ lockdown again.
How this has been handled has been farcical from the start, but not many seem to notice or care. I don't get it 