It is difficult to keep discussions on Covid in schools wholly data-based, simply because so very little good data has been collected - instead, public debate has been driven by assertion and obfuscation.
It is very frustrating, for those of us wanting to make points ABOUT schools that are factual, to be excluded because we cannot provide the hard date that might make them more acceptable here, because that data is not collected for us to use.
Should we ignore this part of the Covid picture because of the data issue? Or allow the debate to continue using such data as we do have, which unfortunately is often 'soft' or incomplete, due to poor data collection methodologies and abandoned studies?