whilst I'm on my population estimates soapbox
These are the English Councils with the biggest percentage variance between the most recent ONS estimate (mid year 2019 based published in June 2020) and the latest NIMS figure (or at least that published in last Thursday's weekly NHS file).
We have, and I'll reference Cambridge as the first listed in the table as (extreme) example figures
Council
ONS population estimate; in the case of Cambridge 124,798
NIMMS population estimate ; Cambridge 182,739
Difference between the two figures in this example NIMS is 57,941 higher
% difference between the two figures in this example NIMS is 46% higher. NB this is at the very extreme end of the spectrum
ONS 2 Yr this cryptic column is the percentage difference between the ONS estimate published in June 2020 and that in June 2018 (given there is a roughly 2 year gap between ONS and NIMMs figures as well). In this example the population in Cambridge was estimated to have had a marginal decrease of minus 0.1%
D1 ONS ; first dose uptake using overall number in last Thursday's weekly file; so not the latest and of course not reflecting the demographic make up of each Council. For Cambridge that would be 61.8% ; placing it just past 200th against just past 300 Councils in England.
D1 NIMS ; first dose uptake using the NIMMS population which for Cambridge 42.2%; placing it 299th ; or one of the lowest in England.
The final two columns show the equivalent percentages for 2nd Dose
The table just shows those Councils with a NIMMS figure at least 17.5% higher.
Overall only one council are Gosport had a NIMMS population figure lower that the ONS figure
The scatter graph shows the full picture:
- note different scales for each axis
- NIMS growth over ONS x axis
- ONS 2020 growth over ONS 2018 y axis