This isn't how modern medicine works with no control group and no tracking of outcomes in patients. Anecdotal evidence when HCQ has been shown to be ineffective in two large RCTs in treating COVID is simply not robust
I don't care if "this is not how medicine works". I'm not a medical student writing a thesis, and my opinion is not going to change the way things are done regarding Covid19 treatment so what does it bloody matter.
This is just an informal chat on Mumsnet, and all I come here to do is give my own, personal opinion, not submit an essay for approval by my teachers, or you. I'm not expecting marks out of 10.
My personal opinion. Based on several months of probing into the issue and listening to various doctors' and scientists' opinions. I have no desire to recap it all here for your benefit, and I don't owe you anything. So no, challenge not accepted.
I've said already on this thread: people should do their own research. Mine has convinced me. Your opinion may differ, I am not obliged to justify myself to you, neither do I have any desire to change your opinion or argue about this. I really don't care what you think and you are free to have the opposite opinion.
And yes, I am quite happy with anecdotal evidence. You may not be but I don't care. If someone is qualified, has a good reputation, and has convincing arguments about their own personal experience of treatment, I will believe them. In my long and rather unusual life I've seen many instances, with my own eyes, of healing that would not ever get a peer-reviewed paper, and yet -- they worked. That's what mattered.