@Tealightsandd
Yes, I think it's been said London is bottom when it's comes to vaccination rate/proportion of population done. Which is concerning seeing as, with Heathrow, it's the frontline for any new strains, like the South African or Indian ones.
I know a lot is down to high hesitancy rates, but earlier in the year Sadiq Khan was complaining about London getting a lower share. That can't have helped.
I thought extra supply would've been sent for the 40s given the situation with the SA strain.
I think that the ONS data is off - particularly for London though.
In the 75 - 79 year age group more people than 100% of the ONS estimate have been vaccinated in every region bar London.
I was also reading last night that demand for primary school places in London is down 9% on last year. Thats an extraordinary decline that I just don't see being down to a lower birth rate. It was suggested that people 'forgot' to apply but I'm not buying that either. There has to be an unusual movement of people going on too. Whether that be last year or in the last few years since the ONS last collected data for their estimate. Especially since there seems to be a shift in older populations too.
The suggestion here is that a lot of people may have relocated out of London during / prior to the pandemic either moving abroad (possibly to country of origin) or to take up permanent residence in second properties / relocating out of London permanently.
It could also possibly represent the less permanent nature of living in London (with people renting and not being as easy to contact).
Either way the ONS estimate of where people are living is inaccurate somehow so in view of the primary school applications seeming to echo this, I'm now inclined to take those %s of those vaccinated in London with more of a pinch of salt than i did before. My suspicion is we have vaccinated a higher percentage of people living in London than we believe from the data as a result and the worry about lower take up in London is over stated.