@SpringisSpinning
I except every boss to break their necks to pull out every single feasible stop to make sure their staff are safe, as a basic duty of care.
And that would be great IF there were never any conflicting needs between staff, the people they work with and the locations of work.
The reality is that there ARE conflicts, so data as to what is least damaging on a population level, has to be followed.
In the funeral director example, the risks inherent with leaving a body to decay in a home, sadly outweigh the possible risks to the funeral director of catching covid.
The need to keep patients safe and prevent them from harming themselves outweighs the risk to MH nurses of catching covid. It's a case of prioritising definite risk over possible risk.
I feel for teachers who are CV and can totally understand why they feel they can't return at the moment. But on a population level, the risks to the kids of not being in school are statistically far higher than the possible risks to teaching staff. All the government's scientific advisors have said so.
Yes, there will be individuals for whom this isn't the case, but decisions need to be based on population-level risk.
Many teachers didn't want to go back until they could wear masks and have regular testing. That will now happen. No manager can change the school building to make it safer. We have to work with what we have got. And sadly, that will always include an element of risk, because that is the real world when it comes to viruses.