Cosmos123
Those on furlough are likely to be those warnings g minimum wages bar staff, waiters and waitresses etc.
Now they have to live on 80% of what little they earned.
Having a jolly time, sure.
Such a selfish view point OP.
If their furlough incomes are so low, as a household they'd ve entitled to uc. If they're not entitled, then that says it all...
But if they're claiming both, that's a double cist, as yet again, uc alone would be cheaper.
I'm not sure I understand your point here, but UC or TC are limited to a certain income a month, so yes if the furlough income is very low it will be topped up by UC and to that amount. If there was no furlough, the entire amount would come from UC. The same would apply for wages, the more you earn, the less UC you'd get and vice versa. So the cost, whether you call it UC or furlough, or a bit of each would be the same.
In addition, my contract was 25 hours, I regularly worked more, a lot more over the busy periods, there was only maybe a week or two in January that I actually worked 25 hours. That's what kept me afloat, the overtime, when on furlough I received 80% of the 25 hours I'm contracted to. Obviously no overtime to build my wages up. I also did the odd shift on bank work in a care home (where I now have a ft position since being made redundant ) which they didn't want me to do at the start of all this for obvious reasons.
So I was on 80% of my contract, not 80%of what I actually earned in reality.