[quote hamstersarse]@Feedingthebirds1
I think the point is about young people and children and the impact this is having on their lives seems to have no recognition in any of the policy making.
In discussion about lockdowns and erosions of freedoms there seems to be no acknowledgement about how different life stages are impacted in different ways.
I am 46, I can work from home, I've led a pretty full life. I am bored and have total sensory underload but I am generally fine. However, teenagers for example, have faced sudden disruption during a key stage in their transition to adulthood. During this stage, they usually become more autonomous and begin planning for their futures. They cannot get this time back, it isn't a pause button, it will hinder their development into adulthood. Genuinely, look back to when you were 14-15 and think about what it would have been like to be essentially locked in your own home with your parent(s) for weeks on end? Not being able to see your friends, get a boy/girlfriend? Try a bit of underage drinking? Explore where you live? Have to navigate the complexities of social relationships? Never mind all the milestone/life long memory events such as leaving school, school trips, winning prizes, losing prizes.
You may in your mind dismiss these things as irrelevant because 'people are dying' but I don't dismiss them. Passages in life are important, very very important.
I feel we have completely disregarded the natural growth required for children and young people in the name of saving very old and usually sick people. This is at the tipping point of being immoral to young people and it really is enough now - they have done their bit. I'm not surprised at all if they start to get angry.[/quote]
I agree re children. It is dismissed too easily.