I've just come on for my good news fix and to say several things:
I have ALWAYS wanted a pet baby elephant but my AWFUL family will not let me have one. We have a frigging gerbil.
I have a huge soft spot for Chris Whitty too, but sorry Ladies, he's taken. He works with a friend - he is apparently as lovely and devoted as he looks on TV.
Anyway, the real reason I'm here is I've been doing a bit of reading about the Israel vaccination study on Twitter and the results are probably even stronger than they look. They compared a group of over 60s who had the vaccine early on with a group who had not at that point had it. They then watched them over the next couple of weeks. However, during those weeks, quite a few (don't know how many) of the 'control' group ended up having the vaccine too. So, what they ended up comparing is a group of people who all had the vaccine, with another group, some of whom had and some of whom hadn't. This will almost certainly have reduced infections in the control group and will have made the reduction due to the vaccine (cited at 60%) look smaller than it really was. Second, they only followed them for a couple of weeks and it looks to me as if the lines on the chart were still diverging. In a few more weeks, and especially after the second dose, you would expect a bigger difference still. I don't know if I've explained that very well, but long story short, 60% reduction after the vaccine is probably an under-estimate!