studychick81
It is extreme, that's the point - it's less extreme than locking down entire parts of the UK or the entire UK as a whole, yet we've done that and are doing that again now. Students not drinking is not more extreme than using the police and army to compel free citizens to remain in their homes. If it's a choice of one or the other, which is less extreme? Pointedly, this would also mean uni students were free to roam again. If we object to a liquor ban, surely we object to mass lockdown?
I think the uni protests are right, and that it's an absoute disgrace that uni students were tricked into returning to uni only to be locked in their halls for full fees to subsidise landlords. I think uni students are being unjustly demonized and effectively imprisoned for cash - much of which comes from loans, so the uni students are going deeper into debt, to reduce wealthy landlords' debts. Monstrous.
I think the reason that there hasn't been a liquor ban is because the government knows that the real issue is that we will never get numbers down in the UK with free open borders - everytime we get the numbers down, travellers will simply bring it back in again en masse. What's the point?
Politicians do like to travel. ✈