@StatisticalSense
This is extremely worrying. The scientists cannot be allowed to run the response without the involvement of economists as there is a need for the country to balance competing objectives in a way that the scientists alone wouldn't consider (as their job is simply to reduce the impacts on health).
Uh what?
Do you actually believe that whoever will be making that announcement (in that case, Whitty) will be making policies on the spot, and then, that's it, whatever they say is now law? (so for God's sake, let's send an economist to argue back and stop them!?)
Or don't you think that all these things have already been discussed with the government, and that the government also talks to economists, and that decisions have been made based on all that, and that Whitty will just be a spokesman[] delivering the official government-approved plan?
[] See also, scapegoat, fall guy