Do we need to start looking at different stats than just the number of positive cases? Especially if it's true that the virus has changed to be more easily spread but generally less dangerous.
So how many deaths?
How many serious illnesses or hospitalised cases?
How many have serious long term complications (and are these in greater numbers than say if you have had pneumonia - that often leaves longer term damage and it often takes months to be fully fit, took me a year) that will reduce quality of life, beyond a year or so?
Are we able to treat it more effectively and thereby reducing the cases of serious illness or fatality?
We test more so we get more positive cases.
We now test people before they get the hospital stage which we couldn't do in March/April.
So is it that it's now more common to get but less dangerous to have?
It's clear we cannot live like this for ever. We cannot continually live isolated and without close contact with other people. After 6 months people are already fighting against additional restrictions, even those who were most strict at the start. Some things are easier to deal with - masks, social distancing in shops, increased hygiene, etc - but some are just not sustainable long term - not being able to hug your parents/grandparents, boyfriend and girlfriends not being able to be within 2m of one another, etc.
Life under restrictions simply isn't sustainable long term.
And I'm coming from a point of being clinically vulnerable and someone who was really strict about the rules from March. But losing three close family members (non Covid deaths) throughout this and not being able to mourn properly with family, missed one of events ( I have a dd who has turned 18, missed exams, had horrendous a level results experience, missed end of school rites, and due to go away to university under rubbish circumstances) has made me really question some things and whether we can really go in like this for much longer.