To assess health risks, we need to look at statistics, recommendations of public health experts around the world, the actions of governments around the world.
There is no vast conspiracy by governments or left, right, centre, democracies, dictatorships, Bill Gates, Soros etc to invent a global public health crisis
There is significant risk to some, not to others and too many MN posters seem at the extremes of either denial or doom
- probably most people in rl are living quietly in the middle range
The risk of COVID is absolutely tiny for people under 40 with no health conditions
From about age 45, having COVID doubles your normal risk of death
BUT
so long as community level of infection remains low, you also have only a small risk of catching it
The risk really takes off for those aged 60+ who form a significant % of the population
Some work in important roles; some have just started retirement .... and all can vote.
The real problem with COVID - which is what mostly has driven the lockdowns and SD -
is that the % requiring hospital or ICU treatment is orders of magnitude higher than other diseases like flu
In Germany - before the age of infection dropped so dramatically after lockdown ended -
about 18% of confirmed cases required hospitalisation, 2% needed ICU
If community level infection level increases beyond a certain point,
then the elderly will be infected much more
and any health system would be overwhelmed, even the massive German one, as Merkel warned us.
Risk of dying increases x 10 with every 20 years of age
So someone aged 60 has about 100 x the risk of a 20-year-old^
and aged 80 about 1,000 x the risk
- but at age 80 the average woman has a life expectancy of 10 years, the average man 9 years
So - for those outside care homes - this robs them of many years.
I discount comparison to risks of diseases like Ebola, malaria etc
because these are not relevant risks, any more than mass famine is,
for those of us living in developed countries, almost all MNers are