I've just said on another thread, there is no 'keeping things as normal' option here.
It's Lockdown, or breakdown.
Either we take measures to reduce transmission (slow spread) - and we have lockdown.
Or we let it run rampant (this seems the government's position - and what happened in Italy - yes they've taken lockdown measures eventually but clearly a bit too late) and we have breakdown of services and lack of hospital beds.
In Italy they have breakdown, in Singapore they have lockdown. Which is doing better?
I want lockdown, not breakdown. I want the government to listen to experts and not hedge their bets and 'hope' it's going to get better. Hope isn't helpful here - studying what's happened elsewhere and implementing the good plans is. We're lucky in that we've got it later than elsewhere so we have forewarning and can see what's reduced spread and what hasn't.
If we have breakdown it will be the government's fault.