Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Trump is desperate. How can he resolve the Iran shitshow?

1000 replies

TooBigForMyBoots · 06/04/2026 00:32

He is flailing, desperate and increasingly unhinged. Weakening the USA, alienating allies and strengthening the enemies of democracy with every step.

How can he fix this?
Can he fix it at all?

  • [Title edited to correct typo]
OP posts:
Thread gallery
55
Theolittle · 08/04/2026 16:05

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 15:59

Do you really think that Iran will be getting everything they want in their 10 point plan?

The ceasefire is the beginning not the end of the peace deal.

Yeah right cos Trump holds all the cards

My point is - what was the point of this invasion? Total fuck up from the US and unbelievable they are claiming a victory. Absolute morons.

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 16:06

Theolittle · 08/04/2026 16:05

Yeah right cos Trump holds all the cards

My point is - what was the point of this invasion? Total fuck up from the US and unbelievable they are claiming a victory. Absolute morons.

Oh! You do think that Iran will be getting everything they want in their 10 point plan ... I'll remind you of that when they publish the eventual peace deal.

Theolittle · 08/04/2026 16:11

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 16:06

Oh! You do think that Iran will be getting everything they want in their 10 point plan ... I'll remind you of that when they publish the eventual peace deal.

No I don’t think they’ll get what they want, but the US won’t get anything of benefit either.

What concerns me the most is the pain and hardship inflicted on Iranian and Lebanese civilians multiple times over, because of morons in the US

RedTagAlan · 08/04/2026 16:12

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 15:59

Do you really think that Iran will be getting everything they want in their 10 point plan?

The ceasefire is the beginning not the end of the peace deal.

Given that Trump is talking about doing a Joint venture with Iran to collect the tolls, I can't see him wanting to dump that bit. Those old $$$$ signs in his eyes. And if he wants to make money, it's likely he will need to lift the sanctions and pressure others to remove proscriptions.

I reckon Trump has just seen an alternate to his tariffs. Esp given that his SCOTUS said they were not legal. And he can use it against leverage. " French tanker ? Macron ? $15 mil. Argentina ? Free "

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 16:17

Theolittle · 08/04/2026 16:11

No I don’t think they’ll get what they want, but the US won’t get anything of benefit either.

What concerns me the most is the pain and hardship inflicted on Iranian and Lebanese civilians multiple times over, because of morons in the US

Neither side will get everything they want, obviously.

They will both get some concessions which will allow face saving/both to claim victory.

Theolittle · 08/04/2026 16:28

Iran has shown that they can quite easily control the SoH if they don’t get what they want. Depends how far they want to push it.

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 16:32

Theolittle · 08/04/2026 16:28

Iran has shown that they can quite easily control the SoH if they don’t get what they want. Depends how far they want to push it.

Yes ... but they agreed to a temporary ceasefire that will hopefully lead to a permanent ceasefire, so had their own reasons for wanting to end the war.

Probably didn't fancy taking a chance that Trump was bluffing when he threatened to destroy their power plants, bridges and other infrastructure.

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 16:58

Israel is still bombing Lebanon

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 17:01

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 16:32

Yes ... but they agreed to a temporary ceasefire that will hopefully lead to a permanent ceasefire, so had their own reasons for wanting to end the war.

Probably didn't fancy taking a chance that Trump was bluffing when he threatened to destroy their power plants, bridges and other infrastructure.

Trumps was planning a destruction of a civilization and you think they should have called his bluff?

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 17:04

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 17:01

Trumps was planning a destruction of a civilization and you think they should have called his bluff?

No I definitely don't think that they should have called his bluff re the targeting of power plants and bridges. They did the right thing in agreeing to a temporary ceasefire - even if it took crazy rhetoric to get them there.

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 17:07

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 16:58

Israel is still bombing Lebanon

Yes they are and Netanyahu's office said on X that The two-weeks ceasefire does not include Lebanon.

Hopefully a permanent ceasefire will include Lebanon, that is something for the negotiators to work on.

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 17:12

As Trump is very interested in making the toll charge a joint Iran-US venture, I am sure he will have a word with Netanyahu.

From making genocidal threats to becoming business partners in 24 hours Hmm

RedTagAlan · 08/04/2026 17:21

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 17:07

Yes they are and Netanyahu's office said on X that The two-weeks ceasefire does not include Lebanon.

Hopefully a permanent ceasefire will include Lebanon, that is something for the negotiators to work on.

They need to find a venue for the talks. Below from CNN just now.

And no, I am not putting problems in the way. They will find somewhere. I just find this ironic. Iran have very good reason to be selective of where. And it seems the US are understanding that the precedents they have set might not be all that good after all.

"Trump casts doubt on Vance attending peace talks, citing security concerns

By Aileen Graef and Kristen Holmes

President Donald Trump said today that the direct peace talks with Iran will happen “very soon” but was unsure if Vice President JD Vance will attend.
“We’ll have Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, JD — maybe JD, I don’t know. There’s a question of safety, security,” Trump said of the planned talks in Islamabad.
A source familiar with the planning told CNN that officials were no longer making preparations for the vice president to attend the in-person talks this week. Given the precarious nature of the ongoing negotiations, that decision could still change, the source noted.
The US, Iran and Israel agreed to a two-week ceasefire on Tuesday while they pursue a long-term deal to end the war."

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 17:31

RedTagAlan · 08/04/2026 17:21

They need to find a venue for the talks. Below from CNN just now.

And no, I am not putting problems in the way. They will find somewhere. I just find this ironic. Iran have very good reason to be selective of where. And it seems the US are understanding that the precedents they have set might not be all that good after all.

"Trump casts doubt on Vance attending peace talks, citing security concerns

By Aileen Graef and Kristen Holmes

President Donald Trump said today that the direct peace talks with Iran will happen “very soon” but was unsure if Vice President JD Vance will attend.
“We’ll have Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, JD — maybe JD, I don’t know. There’s a question of safety, security,” Trump said of the planned talks in Islamabad.
A source familiar with the planning told CNN that officials were no longer making preparations for the vice president to attend the in-person talks this week. Given the precarious nature of the ongoing negotiations, that decision could still change, the source noted.
The US, Iran and Israel agreed to a two-week ceasefire on Tuesday while they pursue a long-term deal to end the war."

I thought they had agreed on Islamabad as a place to hold negotiations?

RedTagAlan · 08/04/2026 17:40

Twiglets1 · 08/04/2026 17:31

I thought they had agreed on Islamabad as a place to hold negotiations?

Too dangerous. No idea. There was that thing at the start where US contractors in Pakistan killed 16 I think. At a US consulate. Attackers or protesters ? Not for here.

Anyway, something that has been obvious has just been confirmed by CNN just now. Clip below. Different hymn sheets.

"Iranian-released peace proposal differed from plan Trump called a basis to negotiate, official says
By Dana Bash
When Donald Trump announced a two-week cease fire with Iran yesterday, he said the US had received a 10-point peace proposal that he believed was a “workable basis on which to negotiate.”
But when Iran later released a 10-point proposal to reporters, it was different from the one to which Trump was referring, a White House official told CNN today.
The extent and nature of the differences was not immediately clear. The White House official did not elaborate."

Question is, how did this happen? My suspicion is that Trump made up his own. But I am sure your thoughts will be different.

No problem, It can hopefully work out.

1dayatatime · 08/04/2026 17:43

1dayatatime · 07/04/2026 23:02

Look the US is not going to nuke Iran nor is it going to be using Darth Vader's Death Star.

What I do ask is that the posters who posting about the potential for nuclear weapons, just reflect in a few days time on their level of either ill founded paranoia or intentional scare mongering.

So I wonder if there is now any shred of embarrassment or awkwardness from those posters suggesting that the US would be launching nukes against Iran today.

Stirabout · 08/04/2026 17:49

1dayatatime · 08/04/2026 17:43

So I wonder if there is now any shred of embarrassment or awkwardness from those posters suggesting that the US would be launching nukes against Iran today.

Iran and the US agreed to a temporary ceasefire
We can't know what we can’t know

Theolittle · 08/04/2026 17:49

1dayatatime · 08/04/2026 17:43

So I wonder if there is now any shred of embarrassment or awkwardness from those posters suggesting that the US would be launching nukes against Iran today.

I wonder if there’s any shred of embarrassment from Trump supporters that you can’t beleive a word he says

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 17:49

Why would anyone be embarrassed for not believing that it was 'just scaremongering'?

Fwiw, I beleive the threat was real.

Tanyyya · 08/04/2026 17:49

1dayatatime · 08/04/2026 17:43

So I wonder if there is now any shred of embarrassment or awkwardness from those posters suggesting that the US would be launching nukes against Iran today.

I am not sure who should be feeling awkward and embarrassed today. Trump is the one shouting he would destroy Iran and actually the so called deal he has now is not a win for Trump, it’s more of a win for Iran if you look at the details.

Stirabout · 08/04/2026 17:50

Ellen2shoes · 08/04/2026 15:50

Interesting piece by Ehud Shapiro on how Trump could resolve the shitshow. It acknowledges that the ‘wound’ of Palestine must be addressed, that the US must give its support for statehood within international boundaries and that this is the crux of the ME conflict.

Have pasted below as I think I read that someone wasn’t able to open links.

thehill.com/opinion/national-security/5819490-palestine-is-trumps-leverage-to-end-the-iran-war/amp/

OPINION>OPINIONS - NATIONAL SECURITY
Palestine is Trump’s leverage to end the Iran War
BY EHUD SHAPIRO, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR04/08/26 07:00 AM ET

To end the Iran war not in diplomatic defeat, Trump needs leverage on Iran. Here is one. It relates to an issue on which the entire Muslim world agrees: The state of Palestine must form.
The Palestinian wound has festered for decades, and Iran has exploited it to justify its “axis of resistance” against Israel and the US. Palestine is what gives Iran its ideological fervor. Leave this wound open, and it feeds into every conflict in the region. Address it, and a new Middle East will emerge.
For decades, Washington has viewed the Palestinian wound as a moral or humanitarian burden. Now, Trump can use it as leverage.
So what would happen if the U.S. were to offer to form Palestine as part of a deal to end this war permanently? First, Saudi Arabia could lead a comprehensive Arab peace with Israel. Washington has hoped for this since the Abraham Accords. It could now get it, by paying the price of forming Palestine. Paying that price will rally the entire Arab and Muslim world behind a framework that serves American interests: ceasefire, nuclear containment, normalization, regional economic integration, and the disarmament of non-state militias.
Second, Iran yearns and strives for Palestinian statehood — its entire revolutionary identity since 1979 is built on championing the Palestinian cause. By joining a comprehensive deal that includes the formation of Palestine, Iran would achieve its decades-long quest and could thus forgo the “axis of resistance” that has drained its resources. The Arab world could then admit Iran back into its fold, repairing the rift caused by the war with a joint achievement: the birth of Palestine. In such a deal, Iran would gain what the war cannot deliver: the formation of Palestine, sanctions relief, an end to its economic isolation, and a nuclear agreement guaranteeing its security.
Third, with Palestine established, the justification for Hezbollah keeping its arms will disappear. Lebanon could finally disarm it, restore its sovereignty, and make peace with Israel. Peace between Israel and Syria should not trail far behind.
The legal groundwork for this already exists. Resolutions of the UN General Assembly and Security Council, and rulings of the International Court of Justice. The court concluded in July 2024 that Israel’s continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory is unlawful. One hundred fifty-sevencountries have recognized Palestine. All that is needed now is an American decision to support it Palestinian statehood at the Security Council as part of a comprehensive regional peace agreement.
Such an agreement should be anchored by a Security Council resolution admitting Palestine as the 194th member, on the internationally recognized borders of June 4, 1967, with its capital in East Jerusalem. It should establish the normalization of diplomatic relations between Israel and all 57 member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation— notably including Saudi Arabia and Iran. It should include an updated nuclear agreement with Iran, ending its ballistic missile program and economic sanctions. It should terminate all claims and states of belligerency, including the defunding and disarmament of all non-state militias. And it should affirm the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independence of every state in the region.
Like many Israelis, I believe that the occupation is destroying Israel from within. It has run us along a path from occupation to settlements, to millions of Palestinians living without equal civil and political rights, to the October 7 massacre, and from there to the destruction of Gaza and to pogroms and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, to war with Iran. This is not a series of accidents but a chain of causation that can only be stopped by healing the festering wound — an end to the occupation and the formation of Palestine, resulting in equality and security for all peoples in the region. This deal offers exactly that, and Israel will not have a secure future without it.

This deal serves the genuine interests of every party. Trump gets to be the leader who brought peace to the entire Middle East. Saudi Arabia gets security through peace. Iran gets sanctions relief and re-entry into the Arab and international sphere. Lebanon gets its sovereignty back. The Palestinians get a state. And Israel gets peace with its neighbors — near and far — and recognition by the entire Muslim world.
Trump now has the leverage to force this deal on Israel’s government, for the benefit of its people and all the people in the region. He should do it.
Ehud Shapiro is Professor Emeritus at the Weizmann Institute of Science and Visiting Professor at the London School of Economics.

Really good analysis of a positive and lasting way forward

RedTagAlan · 08/04/2026 17:57

1dayatatime · 08/04/2026 17:43

So I wonder if there is now any shred of embarrassment or awkwardness from those posters suggesting that the US would be launching nukes against Iran today.

I definitely thought it was a very real possibility. And I am not embarrassed at all. Or awkward. In fact, I would say of all the people most likely to use one in the next few years it is Trump.

Did you miss the bit from a few months back where he said he wants to start testing again ? He likes big things.

Trump instructs Pentagon to start testing nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China | CNN Politics

Trump instructs Pentagon to start testing nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China | CNN Politics

President Donald Trump on Thursday vowed to begin testing US nuclear weapons “on an equal basis” with Russia and China, heralding a potentially major shift in decades of US policy at a time of growing tensions between the world’s nuclear-armed superpow...

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/29/politics/nuclear-weapons-testing-trump-china-russia-intl-hnk

Stirabout · 08/04/2026 18:17

RedTagAlan · 08/04/2026 17:57

I definitely thought it was a very real possibility. And I am not embarrassed at all. Or awkward. In fact, I would say of all the people most likely to use one in the next few years it is Trump.

Did you miss the bit from a few months back where he said he wants to start testing again ? He likes big things.

Trump instructs Pentagon to start testing nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China | CNN Politics

and he’s unhinged

DuncinToffee · 08/04/2026 18:18

Iranian state media says Iran is closing the Strait of Hormuz" because Israel is violating the peace process.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread