Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Two short videos showing Israelis protesting against Israel's war against Iran and Israelis protesting against Israel state police

161 replies

timeforreflection · 25/03/2026 13:50

Two short videos showing Israelis protesting against the actions of the Israeli state, and Israelis protesting against Israel state police.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6dJFfliqKQs

Before you continue to YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6dJFfliqKQs

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Stirabout · 27/03/2026 21:10

Watched the videos but not surprised and glad Israelis are protesting against this war.

What surprised me more was the number of Israeli Arabs killed in Israel just so far this year and the lack of investigation and accountability.

Perhaps when the far right Government are gone they might all get it

Thanks for posting the videos

Two short videos showing Israelis protesting against Israel's war against Iran and Israelis protesting against Israel state police
timeforreflection · 27/03/2026 21:16

SunnyAfternoonToday · 27/03/2026 18:38

Absolutely correct. As for the general population of Iran holding firearms while living under a rigid religious theocracy, this beggars belief.

As far as I know it has been confirmed by neutral sources outside Iran, that the firearms were from outside Iran. As far as I know - you will need to check that.

Are you aware of what Palentir has been doing in relation to killing people in Gaza, no doubt to be repeated elsewhere? To me it beggars belief that you think the west has some moral high ground here. They don't.

It also beggars belief that the vast majority of people in the west do not agree with armed conflict yet governments are waging it - and still think we are functioning democracies in the sense that the peoples' wishes are taken into consideration.

We want peace, Sunny Afternoon. Peace.

OP posts:
timeforreflection · 27/03/2026 21:21

Edited..

OP posts:
Stirabout · 27/03/2026 21:33

War is big business for Trump it doesn’t matter what the American people think he really doesn’t care. In an interview he laughed at the concept of Starmer ‘asking his cabinet’. Trump said whats he asking them for Starmers the leader
Fgs Trump doesn’t even understand what a democracy is
this idiot that’s crashing the markets and killing thousands of innocent people in his support of Israel is as thick as shit.

Palantir fund MAGA candidates and even Trumps ballroom

To Trump it’s not about bringing about peace
its not about how desperate he is for the Nobel Peace Prize 😆😆
War is a money maker
or at least he thought it was 😳

He’s keeping his mates happy for those donations down the line … he may need them when he eventually gets arrested

Bringemout · 27/03/2026 22:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Stirabout · 27/03/2026 22:41

Whether it’s murdering your own or others you have invaded it’s all abhorrent
No one should be supporting that
and supporting this illegal war shows a persons morals are really in the bin

Thank goodness most people are completely against it

inamarina · 28/03/2026 10:45

timeforreflection · 27/03/2026 18:20

They have not said they killed thousands of their own people.

You are endlessly misquoting.

They said that the rioters killed and that only rioters who were violent and causing harm and damage were arrested and punished. They said the innocent people including women and children who got killed were either killed by the rioters or by crossfire, when the rioters were being suppressed. They said that no protesters were killed for protesting, and in fact the government announced measures to meet the economic concerns.

Believe or don't believe, but don't misquote.

If rioters in the UK had firearms and were shooting at the police and innocent bystanders, what would happen? What would happen in the US and in Israel?

By all means say that you support Iran being bombed. Just stop the misquoting.

Facts matter.

Edited

You repeat the Iranian regime propaganda (entirely unquestioningly as it seems) and then go on to say that facts matter.
Absolutely astonishing.

SharonEllis · 28/03/2026 10:54

And suggesting we listen to Marandi shill for one of the most evil regimes on earth 🤔

timeforreflection · 28/03/2026 11:29

inamarina · 28/03/2026 10:45

You repeat the Iranian regime propaganda (entirely unquestioningly as it seems) and then go on to say that facts matter.
Absolutely astonishing.

The other poster said "Iran said [...]"
I said "No, Iran said [...]"
Me correcting them factually is not "unquestioningly" it is being accurate about what was said without giving a value judgement.

The UN has asked that people stop referring to governments as "regimes"

OP posts:
SharonEllis · 28/03/2026 11:45

timeforreflection · 28/03/2026 11:29

The other poster said "Iran said [...]"
I said "No, Iran said [...]"
Me correcting them factually is not "unquestioningly" it is being accurate about what was said without giving a value judgement.

The UN has asked that people stop referring to governments as "regimes"

So what? I think only MN has authority here 😂

timeforreflection · 28/03/2026 12:08

BelleHathor · 27/03/2026 18:29

Images didn't attach.

I agree with you and I liked the clips.

I also think there is a major problem in the UK and the US and fast spreading to EU countries and that is to do with education, and I don't mean in a snobbish or elitist sense, I mean that in the last 50 years or so "progressive education" or "no education" has fallen in and out of fashion in the UK and the US meaning that large chunks of the population have, in relation to geopolitics, quite literally not learned anything about 20th c and 21st c history across the globe and have not learned about politics, world affairs or or history before that, nor about different political systems, or geography, or cultures, or about governance issues in general. This applies to some people going into politics as well, British ministers are sometimes accused of ignorance, and politicians in the UK themselves have commented that they have no leeway when it comes to foreign policy, everything is decided by intelligence and the foreign office. And when it comes to other areas there are committees in place which pretty much direct domestic policy too. And it seems that the press is largely directed by this.

Most of the population won't know root causes of conflicts, not because they aren't interested but because it wasn't covered as part of their education.

OP posts:
inamarina · 28/03/2026 15:21

timeforreflection · 28/03/2026 11:29

The other poster said "Iran said [...]"
I said "No, Iran said [...]"
Me correcting them factually is not "unquestioningly" it is being accurate about what was said without giving a value judgement.

The UN has asked that people stop referring to governments as "regimes"

The UN has asked that people stop referring to governments as "regimes"

Did it now? What if a government is a regime? What else would you use the term “regime” for?

Stirabout · 28/03/2026 15:40

inamarina · 28/03/2026 15:21

The UN has asked that people stop referring to governments as "regimes"

Did it now? What if a government is a regime? What else would you use the term “regime” for?

Collins dictionary is worth looking at for an answer

Twiglets1 · 28/03/2026 15:56

Who gives a shit what the UN asks for?

They seem useless whatever anyone thinks of Iran or Israel or the US.

If the IRGC don’t want to be referred to as a regime, they should stop acting like a terrorist regime.

Stirabout · 28/03/2026 16:15

timeforreflection · 28/03/2026 11:29

The other poster said "Iran said [...]"
I said "No, Iran said [...]"
Me correcting them factually is not "unquestioningly" it is being accurate about what was said without giving a value judgement.

The UN has asked that people stop referring to governments as "regimes"

Zulat, an Israeli Human Rights research institute have used the term ‘Regime’ for Israel

There’s an interesting research piece on the subject dated May 2023
( can't tag and it’s too long to paste I’m afraid )

Nevertheless the term Regime is often used to offend and often used by people who are critical. I can understand and agree why the UN consider it an inappropriate phrase.

IrishSelkie · 28/03/2026 20:43

SunnyAfternoonToday · 27/03/2026 18:38

Absolutely correct. As for the general population of Iran holding firearms while living under a rigid religious theocracy, this beggars belief.

Gun ownership is legal in Iran and it has a thriving black market for unlicensed guns too so why are you saying it beggars belief that Iranians have guns because it’s a religious based government?

Twiglets1 · 28/03/2026 21:04

Amnesty International - How did the authorities respond to protests?

Senior state officials labelled protesters as “rioters” and vowed a “firm” crackdown. On 3 January 2026, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, denounced protesters as “rioters” who should be “put in their place”.

Security forces responded with lethal force to disperse protesters, unlawfully using force, firearms and other prohibited weapons, as well as conducting sweeping mass arrests, including of children as young as 14 years old. They are also subjecting many of those detained to enforced disappearance and incommunicado detention, putting them at serious risk of torture and other ill-treatment. Since 8 January, authorities cut internet access to hide their crimes, and to prevent people in Iran from sharing information with the outside world.

Despite restrictions, Amnesty International has verified evidence showing that authorities have carried out mass unlawful killings on an unprecedented scale amid the internet blackout. Heavily armed security forces are also conducting patrols and establishing checkpoints across the country. Authorities have deployed armed units in the streets to enforce nighttime curfews since 9 January, sending a message that anyone gathering or stepping outside after curfew will face lethal force.

www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2026/01/what-happened-at-the-protests-in-iran/

IrishSelkie · 28/03/2026 22:04

Twiglets1 · 28/03/2026 21:04

Amnesty International - How did the authorities respond to protests?

Senior state officials labelled protesters as “rioters” and vowed a “firm” crackdown. On 3 January 2026, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, denounced protesters as “rioters” who should be “put in their place”.

Security forces responded with lethal force to disperse protesters, unlawfully using force, firearms and other prohibited weapons, as well as conducting sweeping mass arrests, including of children as young as 14 years old. They are also subjecting many of those detained to enforced disappearance and incommunicado detention, putting them at serious risk of torture and other ill-treatment. Since 8 January, authorities cut internet access to hide their crimes, and to prevent people in Iran from sharing information with the outside world.

Despite restrictions, Amnesty International has verified evidence showing that authorities have carried out mass unlawful killings on an unprecedented scale amid the internet blackout. Heavily armed security forces are also conducting patrols and establishing checkpoints across the country. Authorities have deployed armed units in the streets to enforce nighttime curfews since 9 January, sending a message that anyone gathering or stepping outside after curfew will face lethal force.

www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2026/01/what-happened-at-the-protests-in-iran/

Chilling. Thank you for posting, but as a reminder this crack down on protesters is in response to the US & Israeli attacks. It isn’t the cause of the attacks or a factor that can be used to retroactively justify the attacks.

FloralDeerPattern · 28/03/2026 22:05

Twiglets1 · 28/03/2026 21:04

Amnesty International - How did the authorities respond to protests?

Senior state officials labelled protesters as “rioters” and vowed a “firm” crackdown. On 3 January 2026, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, denounced protesters as “rioters” who should be “put in their place”.

Security forces responded with lethal force to disperse protesters, unlawfully using force, firearms and other prohibited weapons, as well as conducting sweeping mass arrests, including of children as young as 14 years old. They are also subjecting many of those detained to enforced disappearance and incommunicado detention, putting them at serious risk of torture and other ill-treatment. Since 8 January, authorities cut internet access to hide their crimes, and to prevent people in Iran from sharing information with the outside world.

Despite restrictions, Amnesty International has verified evidence showing that authorities have carried out mass unlawful killings on an unprecedented scale amid the internet blackout. Heavily armed security forces are also conducting patrols and establishing checkpoints across the country. Authorities have deployed armed units in the streets to enforce nighttime curfews since 9 January, sending a message that anyone gathering or stepping outside after curfew will face lethal force.

www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2026/01/what-happened-at-the-protests-in-iran/

Pro Israel posters quoting Amnesty International, I'm so glad that the experts are finally being listened to 😭

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/

Amnesty International concludes Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza

Amnesty International’s research has found sufficient basis to conclude that Israel has committed and is continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/

SharonEllis · 28/03/2026 22:18

IrishSelkie · 28/03/2026 22:04

Chilling. Thank you for posting, but as a reminder this crack down on protesters is in response to the US & Israeli attacks. It isn’t the cause of the attacks or a factor that can be used to retroactively justify the attacks.

Appalling. The protests in Iran have been going on for ages and peaked in January. Absolutely nothing to do with American/Israeli attacks.

9021Pho · 28/03/2026 22:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

IrishSelkie · 28/03/2026 22:34

SharonEllis · 28/03/2026 22:18

Appalling. The protests in Iran have been going on for ages and peaked in January. Absolutely nothing to do with American/Israeli attacks.

Prior to the US/Israeli attacks on Iran in 2024 and 2025, the Iranian regime’s response to protesters was noticeably less brutal. The January 2026 protests were thus seen as fomented by US/Israeli proxies within Iran.

Shocked you would pretend otherwise when dozens of experts have pointed this out.

IrishSelkie · 28/03/2026 23:11

Iran appears to be a country that hates US interference either direct or by its proxy, Israel, more than they hate the regime.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/18/middleeast/us-toppled-iranian-government-before-hnk-intl

Oil fields: In 1953, the US helped stage a coup to overthrow Iran’s democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh.
He had pledged to nationalize the country’s oil fields – a move the US and Great Britain saw as a serious blow, given their dependence on oil from the Middle East.
Height of the Cold War: The move to nationalize was seen as popular in Iran and a victory for the then-USSR.
Strengthen Shah rule: The coup’s goal was to support Iran’s monarch, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, to rule as Shah of Iran, and appoint a new prime minister, Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi.
The coup: Before the coup, the CIA, along with the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), helped foment anti-Mossadegh fervor using propaganda. In 1953, the CIA and SIS helped pull pro-Shah forces together and organized large protests against Mossadegh, which were soon joined by the army.
US cash: To provide Zahedi, the country’s new prime minister, with some stability, the CIA covertly made $5,000,000 available within two days of him taking power, documents showed.
US acknowledgement: In 2013, declassified CIA documents were released, confirming the agency’s involvement for the first time. But the US role was known: Former President Barack Obama acknowledged involvement in the coup in 2009.
It backfired: After toppling Mossadegh, the US strengthened its support for Pahlavi to rule as Shah. Iranians resented the foreign interference, fueling anti-American sentiment in the country for decades.
Islamic Revolution: The Shah became a close ally of the US. But in the late 1970s, millions of Iranians took to the streets against his regime, which they viewed as corrupt and illegitimate. Secular protesters opposed his authoritarianism, while Islamist protesters opposed his modernization agenda.
The Shah was toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution, which ended the country’s Western-backed monarchy and ushered in the start of the Islamic Republic and clerical rule.”

The Guardian reported today on the futility of the war as well as how the repression of anti regime protesters has increased due to the US/Israel attacks:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/28/iran-pro-regime-demonstrations-detained-people

”Iran’s regime has organised more than 850 public demonstrations of support of the government since the beginning of the war and launched a continuing crackdown on unrest that has led to at least 1,400 detentions, research reveals.
The high number of pro-regime gatherings and the increasing number of detentions underlines the resilience of the Islamic Republic despite a month-long campaign of intensive airstrikes by the US and Israel, experts said.”

*”The researchers noted that 99.2% of protests were pro-regime. “The near total absence of anti-regime protests suggests either genuine nationalist consolidation under external attack, heavy self-censorship, or effective pre-emptive suppression through the arrest campaign,” they wrote.

“The arrest campaign is the regime’s primary domestic tool – [with approximately] 1,465-plus detained in 27 days. Charges escalated from ‘filming damage’ to ‘espionage’ and ‘mercenary’ as the conflict progressed.”
Details of such repression are difficult to obtain, but recent incidents include the deaths of 10 people when Revolutionary Guards fired on anti-regime demonstrators and shot at apartment windows in Tehran on 25 March, and three killed on 18 March in Chabahar when detainees protested over food ration cuts inside a prison. On 17 March, security forces intervened against gatherings in Fardis and four Tehran districts when demonstrators chanted anti-government slogans, Acled said. “It was only really on the first night of the death of Ali Khamenei that you saw any small level of anti-regime activism. Since, there has been a coordinated effort to have pro-Iran or anti-war protests,” said Raleigh.

“Alia Brahimi, a regional expert with the Atlantic Council thinktank, said none of the pro-regime protests would have been spontaneous and showed how leadership structures in Iran had withstood the joint US-Israeli offensive.”

The US/Israeli attacks have killed civilians in significant numbers:
”Estimates of civilian casualties vary. More than 1,900 people have been killed and at least 20,000 injured in Iran since the start of US and Israeli attacks, said María Martinez of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) on Friday, citing figures provided by the Iranian Red Crescent. The US-based Human Rights Activists news agency (HRANA) said on Wednesday that 3,300 people had been killed since the war began. It said 1,464 of those were civilians, including at least 217 children.“

Ellen2shoes · 29/03/2026 00:33

There are 90 million people in Iran. Do we know what they want? While it seems (again, what do we know?) that the majority want an end to the regime and many have denounced Islam as a result of it, there also are many who support it including the parents and grandparents of those who don’t.

It is to me an abhorrent regime, but no more abhorrent than the US/Israeli alliance who seek to depose it for their own interests.

SharonEllis · 29/03/2026 07:09

IrishSelkie · 28/03/2026 22:34

Prior to the US/Israeli attacks on Iran in 2024 and 2025, the Iranian regime’s response to protesters was noticeably less brutal. The January 2026 protests were thus seen as fomented by US/Israeli proxies within Iran.

Shocked you would pretend otherwise when dozens of experts have pointed this out.

Yet again denying the agency of the Iranian people. Noone with any credibility believes that the protests are anything other than an authentic response to 40 odd years of repression, combined with the collapsing economic situation for ordinary Iranians. When your own government shoots you in the eye for refusing to wear a hijab you don't need external influence.
the posts on here are absolutely fucking shameful.

Swipe left for the next trending thread