Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

6000 Palestinians made their way across the wall.

60 replies

vivainsomnia · 26/08/2025 17:20

For a start, I will say that I genuinely have no interest in siding with Hamas, or the IDF, or Palestinians, or Jewish people. I am only interested in better understanding all positions. I have just watched the interview, which turned out to be more of an argument between Kisin and Ammous from a year ago. One main point of disagreement and conflict between them is their differing views on Hamas intentions in Oct 2023.

Kisin believes that it was always Hamas plan to inflict terror and suffering to civilians on that days, whereas Ammous appears to think the intention, at least initially, was just to release Palestinian prisoners.

I read this on Wikipedia The attacks began with a barrage of at least 4,300 rockets launched into Israel[28][29][30] and vehicle-transported and powered paraglider incursions into Israel.[31][32] Hamas militants breached the Gaza–Israel barrier, attacking military bases and massacring civilians in 21 communities, including Be'eri, Kfar Aza, Nir Oz, Netiv Haasara, and Alumim. According to an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) report that revised the estimate on the number of attackers, 6,000 Gazans breached the border in 119 locations into Israel, including 3,800 from the elite "Nukhba forces" and 2,200 civilians and other militants.[33][28][29] Additionally, the IDF report estimated 1,000 Gazans fired rockets from the Gaza Strip, bringing the total number of participants on Hamas's side to 7,000.

It made me think: Could it be that the plan, as it was formulated before the attack, was for Hamas to attack the military bases mainly and but it got totally out of control?

Was it part of the plan that 2,200 civilians would also make their way to Israel and do whatever they did? Do we know the exact role these civilians took? Were they tasked to kidnap people, to rape and kill in the most vicious ways, or did their crossing was unplanned and their actions unexpected?

This is leaving me confused because if it was the case, for instance, that some, or even maybe the worse of the savagery was undertaken by these civilians, I can understand the IDF thinking that the war is not just about Nukhba forces but also about people who would not have been previously identified as dangerous, ie. Palestinian civilians who they are now killing indiscriminately.

Or is it that although classified as civilians, they actually belong to some 'group' that encourages violence against Israel?

Or were these civilians just going with the flow and did take part in some of the demonstrations but did not participate in any of the barbary?

Does anyone actually have any answers to these questions rather than reaching their own biased conclusions as both Kisin and Ammous are doing on that podcast?

Nukhba forces - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nukhba_forces

OP posts:
Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 13:55

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 13:41

Well at least you are honest. You don’t care who dies in Gaza because they can all legitimately considered foes, even the children presumably.

At least you aren’t trying to deny it or justify it to yourself.

I knew the baby-murdering accusations would come out!

You asked specifically about killing "journalists."

It seems to me that Israel has done more to protect Gazan children than their own elected government.

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 15:22

Thought you didn't want to talk specifically about Anas Al Sharif @PaxAeterna

It's boring to cover the same ground, we aren't going to change each other's opinions about him.

Here's a challenge: try to respond without mentioning children.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:01

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 07:57

But you can see from the videos that the civilians were unarmed. They still managed to carry out vile atrocities, with great enthusiasm.

I'm very wary of this perception of Israel as a load of angry men bombing helpless women and children. There are some pretty fucking angry men hiding behind them.

It is good to be wary of perceptions that have no basis in fact or no evidence to support them.

This is not the case with Gaza because it is a fact that Israel has sent in tens of thousands of armed men who are shooting anyone that moves (even escaped Israeli hostages waving white flags and calling out in Hebrew) the air forces are in fact also bombing helpless women and children.

The IDF’s own database shows that 83% of the people they have killed were civilians, with over 66% being women and children. So even Israel agrees this is not a perception, but the reality of the Gaza war,p.

As for the “fucking angry men hiding behind them (women and children)” Arent Hamas hiding underground in tunnels? Where they don’t allow women and children to shelter? Which keeps Hamas terrorists safe & well away from the bombs dropped on the women and children filled hospitals, schools, churches & mosques & tents in the ‘safe evacuation zone’?

There are ways to do tunnel warfare which would not involve turning above ground civilian shelters to piles of rubble soaked in the blood of women and children.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:16

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:15

Plus this journalist was also on the Hamas payroll according to documents seized by the IDF so he was more than someone who "just" sympathised with the goals of the organisation (killing Jews etc).

Snopes says that these alleged documents were never produced or authenticated, they report that Israel has not provided proof he was linked to Hamas.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/11/al-jazeera-anas-al-sharif-hamas/

They conclude they can neither confirm nor repute the allegations by Israel regarding Anas al-Sharif.

Investigating claim slain Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif was affiliated with Hamas

The Israel Defense Forces made the allegation without proof. Al Jazeera and al-Sharif rebutted the accusations.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/11/al-jazeera-anas-al-sharif-hamas/

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:22

allusernamesaretakennow · 03/09/2025 11:29

Gangs of men, many on mopeds, cars etc can and did rape, torture, murder and take hostage. The video with the Bibas mother and her babies on a motorbike as they were taken away, distraught, taken away to their deaths by 'ordinary men from Palestine'. Not pleasant men who wish to build a better future for their own wives and children, just men who hate and want to kill and wipe out and yet also stick their hands out for aid from the West and fail to link cause and effect - kill, rape, torture and take hostage then expect conflict.

Those were not “ordinary men from Palestine” those were heavily armed terrorists.
(warning- this is footage of the Bibas family being taken hostage)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-3089841/Video-Footage-shows-kidnapping-Bibas-family-Kibbutz-Nir-Oz.html

Again, one of the features of terrorists is they don’t wear military uniforms when attacking. They wear civilian clothing.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:23

@Beachtastic
But you can see from the videos that the civilians were unarmed.
I haven’t seen any videos where unarmed civilians were committing the Oct 7 atrocities.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:26

Gloriia · 03/09/2025 08:28

'However, IDF’s own count shows that 17% of the Palestinian dead in Gaza were terrorists and 83% were civilians from Oct 23 to May 25. This ratio is incredibly poor and indicative of either negligent incompetence or indiscriminate attacks either of which puts us into war crime territory.'

17% were known to the IDF that does not mean the 83% were civilians. This was discussed at length on here or on another thread. It was poor reporting on the Guardian's part, unsurprisingly.

No, it says clearly were known to be combatants. Not simply known. Israel knows the identity of everyone in Gaza. Palestinians had to pass through check points in Gaza with their identity papers and face recognition scanners every time they were displaced en masse.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:32

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 10:21

Yes photographic evidence was provided of that journalist having close ties to Hamas but it wasn’t taken on board. Suggestions that photos were doctored or so what? Doesn’t prove he sympathised with Hamas.

A photo of a journalist post interviewing Hamas’ Sinwar (he is in his press jacket) isn’t evidence of close ties to Hamas.

It’s part of the job of a journalist.

Just like Robert Fisk interviewed Osama bin Laden for the Independent. The many photos of him smiling and sitting next to Osama bin Laden, eating meals with him and so on don’t mean Fisk had close ties to Al Qaeda or was a terrorist.

6000 Palestinians made their way across the wall.
Lifesd · 06/09/2025 14:38

CaramelPecan · 30/08/2025 14:24

Seeing the jubilation on Gaza’s streets on Oct 7th while the dead bodies of dead Israelis were paraded, and at the disgusting ‘funeral’ celebration for the Bibas family, shows all you need to know about civilians in Gaza IMO.

Quite. And don’t forget the celebrations on British streets as well when the news broke. Trying to define that day as anything other than a heinous terrorist attack is disgusting IMO.

Twiglets1 · 06/09/2025 15:33

I can’t be bothered to go round in circles with the same arguments over this journalist who to me quite obviously had links to Hamas. It’s just a difference of opinion we will never agree on.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page