Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East
Thread gallery
36
hellohellooo · 23/08/2025 13:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 13:14

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:03

I’ve said this repeatedly but here we go again. Even if Israel’s goal is to remove Hamas, bombing civilians, starving children, and destroying hospitals is morally indefensible and legally a war crime.

There are alternatives: targeted arrests, intercepting weapons, cyber operations, and international pressure- that neutralise militants without harming innocents. Collective punishment of 2 million people cannot be justified. Precision strikes in other contexts, like Iran, show that indiscriminate bombing is a choice, not a necessity.

International pressure? What pressure is on Hamas? On Israel yes, but Hamas? Barely.

dairydebris · 23/08/2025 13:14

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:03

I’ve said this repeatedly but here we go again. Even if Israel’s goal is to remove Hamas, bombing civilians, starving children, and destroying hospitals is morally indefensible and legally a war crime.

There are alternatives: targeted arrests, intercepting weapons, cyber operations, and international pressure- that neutralise militants without harming innocents. Collective punishment of 2 million people cannot be justified. Precision strikes in other contexts, like Iran, show that indiscriminate bombing is a choice, not a necessity.

I'm sorry but your second paragraph is nonsensical.

Targeted arrests- you think Israeli troops could enter Gaza and peacefully arrest people they believe are Hamas and these people would readily identify themselves and just leave peacefully? Or do you think firefights endangering civilians might happen?

Intercepting weapons- yep, tried that, gor critized for a blockade and anyway Hamas build tunnels and smuggle and hide weapons there. Not effective.

Cyber operations? Against terrorists? Actual lol.

International pressure- I mean theres been a huge amount of that with approximately 0 effect so far... you thank Hamas would respond sympathetically to being asked nicely by France?

I cannot believe that 2 years on we are still seeing these types of comments. No one has ever, ever given a reasonable alternative to how to get rid of Hamas without massive civilian casualties other than - 'not this".

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 13:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SomeWomanSomewhere · 23/08/2025 13:16

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:07

I know he’s been saying ‘Israel has a right to defend itself’ but is he still saying that recently when the threat of famine has been looming for so long
Any recollection of when he said that

( I’m no defender of Starmer btw)

He seems to be mostly verbally hedging these days. His last actual statement on the topic is from 8 August:

The Israeli Government's decision to further escalate its offensive in Gaza is wrong, and we urge it to reconsider immediately. This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages. It will only bring more bloodshed.
Every day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens and hostages taken by Hamas are being held in appalling and inhuman conditions. What we need is a ceasefire, a surge in humanitarian aid, the release of all hostages by Hamas and a negotiated solution. Hamas can play no part in the future of Gaza and must leave as well as disarm.
Together with our allies, we are working on a long-term plan to secure peace in the region as part of a two-state solution, and ultimately achieve a brighter future for Palestinians and Israelis.
But without both sides engaging in good faith in negotiations, that prospect is vanishing before our eyes. Our message is clear: a diplomatic solution is possible, but both parties must step away from the path of destruction.

Source: https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1953713663996576068

https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1953713663996576068

Martymcfly24 · 23/08/2025 13:17

Gloriia · 23/08/2025 13:14

You posted an article from your Instagram a couple of days ago, not sure you should be criticising what I post.

Ahh attack is the best form of Defence.

I posted a genuine article that came from my Instagram account which I didn't realize linked to my own account so I asked MN to withdraw the post. It was a mistake.

You posted a blatant untruth which you refuse to discuss.

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 13:18

Martymcfly24 · 23/08/2025 13:13

No it's not.
It's trying to expand the Israeli borders.

There's no noble conquest here and if there was the last two countries that would be involved are USA and Israel.

Well that’s your opinion. And you’re entitled to it. But you’re wrong.

Martymcfly24 · 23/08/2025 13:20

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 13:18

Well that’s your opinion. And you’re entitled to it. But you’re wrong.

I'll say the same back at you so we will just have to agree to disagree so .

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 13:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:23

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 13:18

Well that’s your opinion. And you’re entitled to it. But you’re wrong.

Wrong
Out of his own mouth
No speculation needed by any of us
He made it quite clear

A famine has been declared in Gaza city
GladioliGreen · 23/08/2025 13:24

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:23

Wrong
Out of his own mouth
No speculation needed by any of us
He made it quite clear

Edited

I mean just a few days ago he was talking about his 'spiritual mission' and his dreams of a Greater Israel. The man is hardly keeping all of this a secret.

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Is this an attempt to shame someone off the thread

Rude

hellohellooo · 23/08/2025 13:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:26

GladioliGreen · 23/08/2025 13:24

I mean just a few days ago he was talking about his 'spiritual mission' and his dreams of a Greater Israel. The man is hardly keeping all of this a secret.

It’s ridiculous isn’t it. At this stage they’re openly telling the world what they’re doing.

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:27

GladioliGreen · 23/08/2025 13:24

I mean just a few days ago he was talking about his 'spiritual mission' and his dreams of a Greater Israel. The man is hardly keeping all of this a secret.

Exactly

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:28

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:26

It’s ridiculous isn’t it. At this stage they’re openly telling the world what they’re doing.

Edited

he made his intentions known to the world in September 2023.

It’s not news

SharonEllis · 23/08/2025 13:29

PinkBobby · 23/08/2025 11:49

To be fair, this is a thread about Israel and Gaza so those two places will be spoken about more than anywhere else. There are many countries I have a problem with but I wouldn’t discuss them on this thread. I think it is fair to explain why countries like Egypt aren’t taking in 2m refugees - that’s not me trying to make it all about Israel, it’s just explaining why another country shouldn’t rehome an entire population.

I also think there are some posters (not you - we’ve spoken a lot) who dodge any questions/posts that criticise Israel. Not accepting any criticism or at least avoiding any criticism of Israel is going to, at this point in time, attract attention because of the evidence out there.

People are shocked by what they are reading/seeing and are rightly criticising and questioning Israel’s actions. A thread like this is a good place to discuss and debate Israel’s actions. It’s a good place to share sources (and call out bias and misinformation).

But there aren't lots of threads about those other places. My social media is not clogged with posts and reels and slogans about those other places, MPs are not being harassed about those other places, a political party is not being founded here in the interests of those other places.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:30

dairydebris · 23/08/2025 13:14

I'm sorry but your second paragraph is nonsensical.

Targeted arrests- you think Israeli troops could enter Gaza and peacefully arrest people they believe are Hamas and these people would readily identify themselves and just leave peacefully? Or do you think firefights endangering civilians might happen?

Intercepting weapons- yep, tried that, gor critized for a blockade and anyway Hamas build tunnels and smuggle and hide weapons there. Not effective.

Cyber operations? Against terrorists? Actual lol.

International pressure- I mean theres been a huge amount of that with approximately 0 effect so far... you thank Hamas would respond sympathetically to being asked nicely by France?

I cannot believe that 2 years on we are still seeing these types of comments. No one has ever, ever given a reasonable alternative to how to get rid of Hamas without massive civilian casualties other than - 'not this".

As much as you’d like it to be, ‘war is hard’ isn’t a legal defence for war crimes.

The idea that the only options are “indiscriminate bombing” or “do nothing” is a false choice. Other conflicts have seen targeted raids on leadership, intelligence-led strikes, and disruption of funding networks. All harder but possible. The Geneva Conventions don’t say “war is difficult so civilians are fair game.” They exist precisely because powerful actors will always argue that mass civilian death is “unavoidable.”

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:32

DrPrunesqualer · 23/08/2025 13:23

Wrong
Out of his own mouth
No speculation needed by any of us
He made it quite clear

Edited

Oo
and how swiftly the discussion moves away from this
I’ve forgotten how many times I’ve posted this and it always gets ignored

Oh well

SharonEllis · 23/08/2025 13:36

dairydebris · 23/08/2025 13:14

I'm sorry but your second paragraph is nonsensical.

Targeted arrests- you think Israeli troops could enter Gaza and peacefully arrest people they believe are Hamas and these people would readily identify themselves and just leave peacefully? Or do you think firefights endangering civilians might happen?

Intercepting weapons- yep, tried that, gor critized for a blockade and anyway Hamas build tunnels and smuggle and hide weapons there. Not effective.

Cyber operations? Against terrorists? Actual lol.

International pressure- I mean theres been a huge amount of that with approximately 0 effect so far... you thank Hamas would respond sympathetically to being asked nicely by France?

I cannot believe that 2 years on we are still seeing these types of comments. No one has ever, ever given a reasonable alternative to how to get rid of Hamas without massive civilian casualties other than - 'not this".

This. People are living in a fantasy world where they still seem to believe Hamas are capable of playing nice.

dairydebris · 23/08/2025 13:37

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:30

As much as you’d like it to be, ‘war is hard’ isn’t a legal defence for war crimes.

The idea that the only options are “indiscriminate bombing” or “do nothing” is a false choice. Other conflicts have seen targeted raids on leadership, intelligence-led strikes, and disruption of funding networks. All harder but possible. The Geneva Conventions don’t say “war is difficult so civilians are fair game.” They exist precisely because powerful actors will always argue that mass civilian death is “unavoidable.”

Israel has done many targeted raids on leadership.

Ditto for intelligence led strikes. Do you think the main leaders taken out were by coincidence?

Unfortunately for civilians, Hamas are embedded within the population by design. So civilians will die.

If Hamas had separated themselves from the general population Israel could have carpet bombed that one place and no civilians would have died. Hamas chooses the opposite. Surely you know this by now?

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:39

SharonEllis · 23/08/2025 13:36

This. People are living in a fantasy world where they still seem to believe Hamas are capable of playing nice.

If this was really just about Hamas, Netanyahu wouldn’t be building on Gaza land and letting settlers move in. That’s not about security, it’s about taking land.

PinkBobby · 23/08/2025 13:39

Montysmoon · 23/08/2025 12:58

Don’t be obtuse. There aren’t hundreds and thousands of people marching the streets of London and other major cities in the world for the poor people is Sudan where there is FAMINE. People rarely even talk about Ukraine these days. Everyone is frankly obsessed with Israel, 80% of whom probably couldn’t point it out on a map, and there is a simple reason for that. I won’t spell it out.

Who said there was famine in Sudan? Who confirmed that dire situation?

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 23/08/2025 13:40

dairydebris · 23/08/2025 13:37

Israel has done many targeted raids on leadership.

Ditto for intelligence led strikes. Do you think the main leaders taken out were by coincidence?

Unfortunately for civilians, Hamas are embedded within the population by design. So civilians will die.

If Hamas had separated themselves from the general population Israel could have carpet bombed that one place and no civilians would have died. Hamas chooses the opposite. Surely you know this by now?

The laws of war don’t disappear just because Hamas embed themselves in civilian areas. Israel still has an obligation to distinguish civilians from combatants and avoid collective punishment. Starving children, bombing hospitals, and levelling whole neighbourhoods goes far beyond hitting specific leaders. That’s why it’s classed as a war crime, regardless of Hamas’ tactics. Surely you know this by now?

Twiglets1 · 23/08/2025 13:40

Martymcfly24 · 23/08/2025 12:06

@Twiglets1 I understand what you are saying that posters aren't talking about the other conflict in the world but I genuinely think part of the reason for that is that there aren't both sides to be argued. Sudan, Ukraine etc there is a very clear path and I would think we would by and large tend to all fall on the same side. Not that' there shouldn't be absolutely more conversation about Sudan, Yemen and other areas because those people are living in hell but the argument factor is not there.

I'm wording this very clumsily but when you see things like the US saying the only flags it is illegal to burn are their flag and Israel's you do feel a sense of why do they get special privileges when their behavior has been so appalling. So posting here I am trying to counteract this narrative.

We agree and disagree on here but I do respect your posts and I know you feel that I am overwhelming negative towards Israel . I wish nothing but peace for Israeli civilians and would love to see the hostages reunited with their families. I would hate anyone to think that the reason I am negative about Israel is anti semitism.

Thank you for clarifying @Martymcfly24

Although we argue on here sometimes I can tell you are a good person. I think you’re a bit misguided sometimes but I’m sure you think the same about me!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread