If we dismissed casualty data every time it came from a government or authority we disliked, we’d lose the ability to track any humanitarian crisis. The Gaza Health Ministry’s numbers have consistently been used and verified by the UN, WHO, OCHA, and even the U.S. State Department. They’re not relying on Hamas “tales”, they’re collating names, ID numbers, morgue reports, and cross-referencing data. That’s why these figures have held up across wars, including in 2009, 2014, and now.
As for “it’s a warzone”: obliterating entire neighbourhoods with no safe zones, blocking aid, and killing tens of thousands (mostly women and children) is not just ‘what happens’ in war. It’s what happens in a war without rules. International law was created precisely to prevent this kind of collective punishment.
Saying “one side has to give in” to justify the mass killing of civilians isn’t morally or legally defensible. The world didn’t excuse atrocities in Syria or WW2 by saying “well, the other side should just surrender.” We mourned civilians, condemned war crimes, and insisted on restraint.
This isn’t about liking or defending Hamas. It’s about whether we believe Palestinian civilians (especially children) have the same right to live as anyone else. That shouldn’t be up for debate.