@mids2019
"One thing that often is missing from these debates is that possibly half of Jordanians have Palestinian routes and many have Jordanian citizenship. Though the relationship between Jordan and Israel is far from perfect importantly they do not threaten each other miltiarily . There are many Jordanians that perhaps do not like Israel but they do see a peace dividend and there is a general interest in that state for economic advancement and stability. With global support what can't Jordan be persuaded to take more refugees from Gaza? It seems that over time Palestianins have retained a culture but also have an InpuT into a state and this to my mind seems a better fate for the region."
Firstly the most important principle is that any movement of Palestinian people out of Gaza and into other countries either on a temporary or permanent basis must absolutely only be done on a voluntary basis. I can see the logic that some Palestinian may wish to move to another country either permanently given the level of destruction or temporarily whilst reconstruction occurs.
Secondly I would very strongly disagree that either Jordan or Egypt (especially Jordan) should host such refugees either temporarily or permanently. The last time Jordan offered sanctuary to Palestinian refugees their hospitality was repaid by the Palestinians attempting a coup and a take over of Jordan. Any repeat of taking in Palestinian refugees would also see Jordan unknowingly taking in hardened radicals that would seek to destabilise (with Iranian help) what is a country that despite a lack of natural resources (and in large part thanks to the Jordanian monarchy) has managed to avoid the turmoil and civil wars that had plagued neighbouring countries.
Given the strong level of support for the Palestinian cause in Ireland I would be interested to see what the views of Irish people are on offering either temporary or permanent sanctuary to Palestinian (importantly on a voluntary basis).