Doesn't history itself put a huge barrier to meaningful peace?
Israel exists and will continue to exist. If we take that as incontrovertible then we can see how the Palestinian cause can never be satisfied in reality as there is an overwhelming goal in their politics to repopulate land that is now Israel.
I think you can then look at Gaza in that context that you have a people densely populated in a tiny region of land who are incredibly impoverished with a culture and political desire to exact revenge on a state they view as oppresive. How do we find a roadmap to peace from that?
In my opinion you are doomed to repeat history if you view Gaza as a region where hope for a people can flourish as economically they can't . We see the results of the inate poverty through the rise of right wing terrorist groups that espouse genocide and as October 7th demonstrates revel in it.
It seems perverse to use a decade or two rebuilding Gaza for the Gazans with poor quality housing and infrastructure (Dubai it won't be) with the Israelis limiting movement and monitoring imports. We also have the reality it will be a territory supported by regional charity; you are literally building a long term refugee camp with no prospect of it changing from that.
The case for voluntary dispersal of Gazans may be alarming to some but I think we have reached a point where that prospect may in absolute reality maybe one that has to be countenanced.
Trump actually said he wishes the Gazans to be happy and in a sense you could argue that happiness is achieved through having hope for yourself and your family and that may not be in Gaza. For the people of Gaza what does it represent but wasteland currently that needs intensive rebuilding that may or may not be fortchoming . You may feel you have a bond to a land but when that land is a desert how powerful can that bond be?