The 9 were fired due to being suspected of involvement, which has yet to be proven. So they were suspected and fired, both are true.
Being fired due to suspicion isn’t proof of involvement, it was announced as a precautionary measure while investigations continued. A spokesperson’s off the cuff opinion as to likelihood of involvement prior to investigations being completed, ie how suspicious are you? is just an opinion and also not proof of involvement.
Upthread, I did list possible (not necessarily innocent) scenarios that would fall under the legal definition of “criminal involvement”, to include lending a motorcycle to a mate and either knowing or not knowing that mate was a Hamas terrorist who then rode it into Israel on Oct 7th for murder, rape and kidnapping.
I agree I mistakenly thought this guy was 1 of the original 9, you corrected me and so that makes him 1 of 10 suspected. He was suspended months ago due to being suspected of Hamas political affiliation, while the other 9 UNRWA employees were fired. So him plus 9= 10 which makes him 1 of 10 suspected UNRWA employees now proven to be 1 of 32,000 that was Hamas.