Yes it would be.
But if we are to apply this analogy to my response then a better fit is video of someone describing being raped, with a caption condemning the rapist for not killing her and saying it’s a crime to have left her alive.
Because that is what I was responding to. A caption claiming that it is a war crime to get a shot, severely injured hostage medical care in a hospital. When it’s not a war crime, but the bare minimum they should be doing.
Condemning Hamas for getting hostages medical care, it puts them in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation. And so we know Hamas is still connected to the world. It may seem like you are hitting back at Hamas to condemn them getting hostages medical care, but my concern is that if i say nothing and don’t let you know no it’s not a crime, then my silence will endanger the hostages still there, that are under increasing risk of being injured. Condemning them getting hostages medical care, even saving their lives at times, that just gives them a reason to not get hostages medical care which means they’d be in even more danger. We shouldn’t be adding to the danger by encouraging Hamas to not get medical care for hostages. The hostages come first to my mind. Condemning Hamas is #2 behind trying to get as many hostages home alive.