I live in a small town in West Yorkshire. I work in the neighbouring city which has high levels of deprivation and a city known for riots.
There was a demonstration and collective prayer, organised by the Council of Mosques, a couple of Saturday's ago and it attracted thousands of people, the invitation was a call to all Muslims, people of faith and of no faith to come peacefully in solidarity with the people of Gaza. There was no violence and no arrests. An offence rate of 0%.
There was a smaller but similar demonstration in my hometown and again, no trouble. The local conservative MP tried to whip up some false outrage about some wording on a sign that he'd seen on a photo (he didn't attend) and he was quickly dismissed by locals of all ethnicities and faiths who'd attended, he said a particular sign used a particular phrase but it didn't. The MP seemed a bit disappointed tbh. There was no violence and no arrests. An offence rate of 0%.
There have been three demonstrations in London and according to Reuters there have been approx 100,000 people at each demonstration. Reuters: 'Since Oct. 7, London police have made 188 arrests for hate crimes, including 98 for suspected antisemitic offences, 21 for Islamophobic offences and 12 for "faith hate crimes". The rest were for public order offences, many of which were racially aggravated.' An offence rate of 0.1%.
There is a legal test that states 'intelligence needs to show that a threat of serious disorder likely' before police can shut down demonstrations. There is no evidence that these demonstrations are causing or likely to cause serious disorder so what is the motivation for calling for the police commissioner to Downing Street to assure Sunak of the safety of the event?