Hamas have built a 5km network of tunnels under Gaza beneath civilian buildings. They house factories for making weapons, and are used to mobilise, communicate and transport resources. These are not tunnels dug out with spoons.
If you would prefer Hamas captured rather than bombed it’s important to consider the Israeli govt”s duty of care to its own troops and whether this would be successful. They have a duty to safeguard their Land Troops. They are the children of Israeli parents being sent into a war zone..
Sending troops in without destroying the infrastructure that allows Hamas to arm and mobilise, and carry out assaults and attacks would be a poor strategy in the theatre of war. They cannot send them into traps
it is therefore the Israeli govt strategy to use heavy artillery to penetrate the earth in Gaza deep enough to destroy and remove the tunnels, before they send in troops.
it is usual in the theatre of war to take action to destroy infrastructure- to immobilise the enemy. In the Ukraine / Russia war bridges and roads were blown up for example so that the enemy could not use them to advance and mobilise and to stop supplies getting through to them. The weaker the enemy are at the point of contact the better in terms of strategy.
The complication for the Israeli govt is that the Hamas infrastructure they seek to destroy is underneath a densely populated area - beneath civilian buildings.
The ethics of preserving civilian life versus taking out the Hamas infrastructure because it is an ongoing and real and present threat is the dilemma in terms of strategy.
There at 199 hostages still not released.
Aid talks are ongoing.
The j international community are talking with both Hamas and the Israeli govt separately..
Countries are sending ships and resources to try to stop the war spreading in the region.
The UK govt has increased its aid to Palestinians people to £10m.
it’s a very complex situation and far more nuanced than “they should capture the people that did it”.