Erica I asked for you anyway, here are the collective responses!!
If you want to join the group (it's a secret fb group) just let me know, they're a lovely and very supportive group of women, all who have had rmc.
Yeah Hun this sounds like me. Bit of a light period after about 4 weeks. Things will be back to normal for next cycle I'd imagine.
That sounds like af to me.
I had this on mc1 and mc3 (both my med man ones), as I bled /spotted for weeks and weeks after both of them, but within the spotting time, I definitely had a few days when the flow was heavier, and I took this to be my af. I know officially the line is that it's not af unless you've had 2 weeks without bleeding before af, but personally i think that's bullshit. I'm sure this was my af, even though i continued to spot before and after.
I imagine if you're still spotting from mc then it means you're still shedding lining, so it makes sense that the af will be lighter/shorter. Of course it could just be a heavier patch of mc bleeding, but I think af is more likely. It's she tracking ov? I'd take that as cd1 if she is.
I had spotting after both mcs for wks but for a few days the flow was steadier and medium like, the bleeding stopped after this so I assumed they were af. (And I think the timing was about right(ish). I also don't think you need to stop bleeding completely to have af.
I didn't spot but all my AFs post MC were lighter.
my AF after my late mc and labour was HORRENDOUS, it was a shock wave of FLOOD that wouldn't stop- couldn't really be missed... But the periods after the 2 early mc's with medical management to them were sort of similar to your friend's - esp last time when my EPRC wasn't complete so I just continue to spot and bleed a bit for about a month- something that I assumed was AF came 4 weeks after my first EPRC but 2 weeks after the second one. So ultra confusing, but I think it always is after a mc. The date of her next cycle might be able to confirm if it was or wasn't