The supply wouldn’t be so short if greedy opportunistic people didn’t buy toys they don’t actually need to gift [OP]
The demand wouldn't be so strong if parents didn't allow their children to fall hook, line and sinker for advertising, and then feel they are obliged to get their children the latest piece of tat. This is greed too, or fear on your part.
Is this really you turning this round to make out it's the children who are the greedy ones? [Funnyfarmer]
I want to emphasise that I am not criticising anyone's child here.
I am criticising parents who lose the run of themselves when it comes to Christmas. I am asking why parents feed this emphasis on stuff. Every time you tell a child that Christmas is about getting a specific reward and that the 'magical' part consists of a certain item under the tree you contribute to the materialistic madness.
I love Christmas.
I do not associate its specialness with piles of stuff under a Christmas tree, or receiving the coveted piece of tat that is advertised the instant the back to school shopping season ends.
It is nice to be able to give a child a nice gift for Christmas, but when something is advertised everywhere it is perhaps sensible to caution the child that an item that is heavily advertised sometimes sells out, or Santa didn't realise how many children wanted one and made too few.
Managing expectations is sometimes kinder than telling a child they can have a certain thing and all they have to do is be good all year.