Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

A tiny bit suspicious of nanny references

277 replies

SlicedMelon · 27/08/2025 17:29

So we have offered a lovely nanny the role and she has provided two references, first name with phone number. I’ve spoken to one who sounded honestly a bit nervous and referenced their child’s ages as exactly the “starting age” of the children in the role as described in her CV (eg said, my two daughters, 5 months and 2 years old rather than 5 and 7 which would be how old they are now - I just feel like a genuine parent would have described children as 5 and 7 and then said something like she started when youngest was a few months old or something like that rather than the exact starting ages?).

I’ve followed up and asked for his full name and wife’s full name and his work email, which he provided, but he doesn’t come up on LinkedIn / neither does company, although there is a website. Is there any other step I could reasonably do to verify this role existed?

I really like her but also don’t want to be relaxed about this considering my spidey senses are going off a bit… could I ask for payslips or something?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Katrinawaves · 30/08/2025 09:54

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 09:49

Sorry?

You mean there’s been a photo of the sender in their work signature?

Yes. It’s a thumbnail photo in the top left beside your name.

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 09:55

Soggydog · 30/08/2025 09:52

If you genuinely like her that much you could give her a second chance to interview honestly with an honest cv, honest answers and real references but on the flipside you will always know how far she will go with a lie and have that at the back of your mind, and it isn't exactly a glowing character reference that she did.

Would you “genuinely like” someone who lied about something relating to your children and their care?

Would you “give her a second chance”?

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 09:56

Katrinawaves · 30/08/2025 09:54

Yes. It’s a thumbnail photo in the top left beside your name.

I don’t doubt it’s possible

but certainly not something I have ever encountered and certainly not evidence that “swish”!

SlicedMelon · 30/08/2025 09:56

OVienna · 30/08/2025 08:24

It is a very reasonable way to verify that you are who you say you are, which is normal to want to do. It is far from unusual to disclose this..I was a nanny employer for several years.

This is good to know. I also think that if people have these secret jobs that they can’t share their email from, surely their partner or someone from the household has a normal job? If I was providing a reference to help a much loved nanny get a job and another parent wanted to verify us using work email and I was a spy or whatever some of the posters here are, I would just get DH to email them. Anyone can make an email account saying [email protected] but it’s impossible to get a fake work account of [email protected]. Based on my recent experience I would not accept a reference if they couldn’t provide a work email and would really advise others to do the same.

OP posts:
Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 09:57

ARE YOU GOING TO REPORT HER TO CHILDCARE l.CO.UK?????

ScaryM0nster · 30/08/2025 09:57

SlicedMelon · 30/08/2025 09:44

Yes it was all very professional and swish. Was quite reassuring if it hadn’t turned out to be her husband lol.

For future reference - very swish email signatures are more common with people trying to look swish or professional than those who actually are.

Thinking through my work contacts, the big organisations and senior roles within them tend to be plain text. Or plain text with small company logo. And large amount of small print disclaimer text.

The ones with fancy designs and graphics are the self employed trying to get a foot in working from their sheds.

Soggydog · 30/08/2025 09:57

Personally no, but not my kids and she seems to believe her gut about people and still think somewhere this person is right so she has the choice as her child not mine. Hence me giving the balanced view of she will always know how far the person went to lie which she won't forget.

Katrinawaves · 30/08/2025 09:58

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 09:56

I don’t doubt it’s possible

but certainly not something I have ever encountered and certainly not evidence that “swish”!

I didn’t say it was swish. I said it was commonplace.

I’ve attached an image from a google search as you apparently think this is some kind of voodoo!

Katrinawaves · 30/08/2025 09:59

Link as screenshot didn’t woek

blog.gimm.io/how-to-delete-remove-an-email-signature-from-gmail/

sociallydistained · 30/08/2025 10:02

I think when you have any sort of doubts when it comes to your kids then follow your gut. I am a Nanny and my CV provides full names, addresses and telephone number for my previous families.

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 10:05

Katrinawaves · 30/08/2025 09:58

I didn’t say it was swish. I said it was commonplace.

I’ve attached an image from a google search as you apparently think this is some kind of voodoo!

But I was commenting on the OP saying it was swish
The Op

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 10:05

Katrinawaves · 30/08/2025 09:58

I didn’t say it was swish. I said it was commonplace.

I’ve attached an image from a google search as you apparently think this is some kind of voodoo!

Omg

I know it’s possible 😆

Chinyreckon · 30/08/2025 10:10

If husband is an employee (rather than it being his own business) I would imagine most employers would see using work email to commit fraud would be gross misconduct. Add in the extra risk of it being a safeguarding issue if any incident occured in nanny’s care and he’s used work resources to verify. It’s not just “secret” jobs that dont allow personal use of work emails. Its for people linking company name /reputation / validation to situations like this.

OVienna · 30/08/2025 10:15

SlicedMelon · 30/08/2025 09:56

This is good to know. I also think that if people have these secret jobs that they can’t share their email from, surely their partner or someone from the household has a normal job? If I was providing a reference to help a much loved nanny get a job and another parent wanted to verify us using work email and I was a spy or whatever some of the posters here are, I would just get DH to email them. Anyone can make an email account saying [email protected] but it’s impossible to get a fake work account of [email protected]. Based on my recent experience I would not accept a reference if they couldn’t provide a work email and would really advise others to do the same.

This is exactly my point.

OVienna · 30/08/2025 10:18

@SlicedMelonalthough I'm a wee bit suspicious that any posters on here could possibly be spies based on their statements about online security...

Missj25 · 30/08/2025 10:20

SlicedMelon · 30/08/2025 09:31

Wow woke up go such a lot of comments. I’m not sure where anyone got the idea that we are still going to employ her from. Me being on the fence about that was from before I confirmed that her references are fake.

I said that I’m (USUALLY obviously!) a great judge of character and she doesn’t seem dodgy at all and that her socials make her seem very normal! And her husband genuinely does have a sweet face (and was nervous on the phone which was a giveaway to me).

I don’t think they’re necessarily horrible people, perhaps just desperate for her to get a job, and it’s possible to find someone has good energy, is kind, funny and warm (and thus be fond of them) but still have a red line on honesty when deciding for a candidate for childcare for an infant. Humans are complex after all.

Thanks for the genuinely helpful advice as I figured this out. To the kind and supportive women who thought it appropriate and useful to call me an idiot, perhaps some self reflection about what value you’re adding to the mumsnet paid childcare topic.

Morning OP 👋..
From what I can gather from your post Is you have a gut feeling she is a good person ? really wants the job & has no references so had made them up 🤷🏻‍♀️..
Why don’t you meet her again & tell her exactly how you feel & what you think & ask her to be honest , or am I being stupid ?

WhyAmISoReal · 30/08/2025 10:24

CleaningAngel · 30/08/2025 09:45

Ask her why she fudged the reference with her husband, you've got nothing to lose

I would actually say to her that the reason she hasn't got the job is because she started off intending to deceive you and clearly thinks nothing about being systematically dishonest.

There is no family that would employ a nanny who is dishonest from the off.

Be factual, don't get into specifics about her Instagram or anything else - do not get drawn into a discussion - just repeat that you discovered she had been dishonest about her references and you are unable to proceed.

Bathingforest · 30/08/2025 10:24

I absolutely don't get the way you terrorise the poor referee and the extent to which they are calling back and forth. My daughters were living in nannies and always got the jobs with either 1 reference or none.

One always worked for single dads who just said on the phone how great she was with each family member, cooked and cleaned for additional pay and never gave their businesses or progressional emails.

Stop terrorising the people, go to an agency instead

DailyEnergyCrisis · 30/08/2025 10:29

You’re a better woman than me op to be so magnanimous- she has seriously fucked you over here and sounds like an absolute master manipulator and extremely professional lier to pull off a flawless interview about 10 years of nanny experience she doesn’t have (or does have and has performed so badly she can’t get a reference). What a bullet dodged- well done for not letting the suss references get the better of you.

HonestOpalHelper · 30/08/2025 10:30

SlicedMelon · 30/08/2025 09:31

Wow woke up go such a lot of comments. I’m not sure where anyone got the idea that we are still going to employ her from. Me being on the fence about that was from before I confirmed that her references are fake.

I said that I’m (USUALLY obviously!) a great judge of character and she doesn’t seem dodgy at all and that her socials make her seem very normal! And her husband genuinely does have a sweet face (and was nervous on the phone which was a giveaway to me).

I don’t think they’re necessarily horrible people, perhaps just desperate for her to get a job, and it’s possible to find someone has good energy, is kind, funny and warm (and thus be fond of them) but still have a red line on honesty when deciding for a candidate for childcare for an infant. Humans are complex after all.

Thanks for the genuinely helpful advice as I figured this out. To the kind and supportive women who thought it appropriate and useful to call me an idiot, perhaps some self reflection about what value you’re adding to the mumsnet paid childcare topic.

Good call, as to the cute face, always remember Ted Bundy was a good looking, kindly seeming, intelligent and charismatic man - estimated to have murdered about 100 women, confessed to 30.

She quite possibly is fine. but lacking in genuine references, made them up - that's silly for any job, but for something as sensitive as this role even the slightest hint of deception is a no-no.

I'm guessing her second reference was bogus too.

Bathingforest · 30/08/2025 10:30

Has she got dbs, is she through an agency, she might be just starting out.

One of my daughters ex employers wife had the ex pick up the phone once < the ex of the dad > and as she was jealous of my daughter for no apparent reason, said she remembers the nanny but is not giving reference as she worked there more than 2 years ago. So what. Give the reference dear woman.

My beautiful, clean, kind, well presented daughter was given a chance with a secret 2 week probation period, she passed it with flying colours and she's still in touch with the dad on FB

SlicedMelon · 30/08/2025 10:31

OVienna · 30/08/2025 10:18

@SlicedMelonalthough I'm a wee bit suspicious that any posters on here could possibly be spies based on their statements about online security...

🤣🤣🤣 agree

OP posts:
HonestOpalHelper · 30/08/2025 10:32

Bathingforest · 30/08/2025 10:30

Has she got dbs, is she through an agency, she might be just starting out.

One of my daughters ex employers wife had the ex pick up the phone once < the ex of the dad > and as she was jealous of my daughter for no apparent reason, said she remembers the nanny but is not giving reference as she worked there more than 2 years ago. So what. Give the reference dear woman.

My beautiful, clean, kind, well presented daughter was given a chance with a secret 2 week probation period, she passed it with flying colours and she's still in touch with the dad on FB

The issue is that this potential nanny the OP found lied and fabricated a reference - that's a big deception, a big lie, which also request planning and conspiracy with another, and the plan is to leave your baby in the care of someone who has started out in such a way - nope.

legoplaybook · 30/08/2025 10:33

Abatingnow · 30/08/2025 09:49

Sorry?

You mean there’s been a photo of the sender in their work signature?

Gmail often have profile photos.

legoplaybook · 30/08/2025 10:35

Bathingforest · 30/08/2025 10:24

I absolutely don't get the way you terrorise the poor referee and the extent to which they are calling back and forth. My daughters were living in nannies and always got the jobs with either 1 reference or none.

One always worked for single dads who just said on the phone how great she was with each family member, cooked and cleaned for additional pay and never gave their businesses or progressional emails.

Stop terrorising the people, go to an agency instead

What do you think an agency will do differently? They will (should) try to establish that the reference is genuine too.