Hi @Shoot4TheStars
I am genuinely pleased that the programme feels like its working for you, because I do know how horrible it is to be in the grip of anxiety within the family, and how hard it is to get meaningful help. I hope the progress continues for you. I can see we are both motivated to try to help other people in what we know to be a really very difficult situation.
I haven't been on the programme myself - though plenty of others on this thread have been, some of whom also felt really positive in the early stages. I have however, spent a number of years working very intensively, with the help of a qualified (private) family therapist, to unpick and heal the roots of my son's anxiety. Like Sam's work, our work also involved looking at the adults in the family and how we needed to do things differently, and work on our own traumas.
I am absolutely certain that someone needs professional qualifications and needs to adhere to professional standards in order to safely do the kind of work we did. That is why there are lots of bodies which offer this kind of regulation and oversight (e.g. those shown here www.hqtherapy.com/professional-bodies-associations-therapy/ - I don't have any links with this organisation, btw, just know it to be a useful page with info), so that families can be protected from rogue traders. And I absolutely believe that this type of work was what we needed to do to help our son long term.
Of course, other families will need different things. But I know that six years ago I could easily have been sucked into working with Sam on the basis of her claims, and I know with certainty that someone without professional experience, qualifications and supervision would not have been able to get to the bottom of my son's difficulties. Tbh I fund it shocking that someone can do this type of work with families without professional regulation, as it can really do harm in the wrong hands.
That of course, is not to say that Sam's work couldn't possibly feel helpful to you, or potentially some other families, in some ways.
My issue is that her business practices are not ethical: in terms of what she (still) promises vulnerable people she can do for them and their children, the ways she is not open about the qualifications of people who work for her, in terms of how she markets her business, funnels people into pressurising sales calls, how she treats families who have not had positive experiences (consistently tries to publicly blame, shame and belittle them), and how she treats anyone who challenges her (however politely or legitimately) on any of the above. She comes across to me as someone who is your best friend whilst you are doing what she wants, and then behaves horribly as soon as you offer any challenge or resistance. Some of the behaviour I have seen myself online and in the radio programme, and heard from other people's testimony, is shocking.
If she really wants to help families she should sort out her business practices; be honest about what she offers, and accept that no-one can 'recover' everyone; then no-one would need to spend their time warning others about her.
I do wish you well, I'm glad you have learnt things that have helped you, and I hope your success continues, but I will continue to warn other families to be very cautious about any dealings they may have with this company or any others run by the same people.