Morning
Well I've left a message for the screening woman to call me back so I'll know for sure later, but a friend of mine reckons that the 1 in 7700 on the medical breakdown is my actual risk result (which is excellent as very low) and that the less than 1 in 250 is the standard blurb that they put in the letter as it's less than the high risk cut off point.
The confusion comes if you read it with the booklet they give you, as that talks about lots of different categories of low risk.
I might suggest to the woman that they don't mention any numbers on the cover sheet to avoid confusion.
Appreciate it may seem a trivial point, but given I've already lost 2 babies trying to have another dc, I'm still not convinced this attempt will actually produce a healthy baby so always assume the worst at any test.
Laugs you can choose to have the downs markers tested either by nuchal scan and bloods, or the quad test. Both give as equal a result in terms of accuracy, just the nuchal is done earlier. As we wouldn't terminate if the baby had downs, and the nuchal meant a day off and travelling to London, we opted for the Quad test.
Definitely only one baby in there!!
Pootle you have my sympathies - any waterworks problems are uncomfortable enough at the best of times, but seem worse when you're pg!
Any body else hit that clumsy stage? I have! Managed to misjudge parking the car the other day and bumped another - and I keep completely forgetting things. Am going to be useless for the next 22 weeks!