I?ve given up on the idea of catching up with the thread, so I?m sorry if I?ve missed anything important.
Littlesez, I agree with LBB, unless you are going to double barrel the name I wouldn?t worry about what happens with the middle initial. It?s a pretty name, go for it obviously I like the name Isabella and I think it always works well with a flower (that?s me trying to look innocent)
KT, I was in hospital with a lady last time who had been told not to get pregnant again as her kidneys wouldn?t cope and she could die. They decided they didn?t want her son to be an only child and would chance one more baby? she got pregnant with triplets! She was on such a strict watch she had the private room next to the nurses? station and wasn?t allowed to leave the ward. My first pregnancy was thought to be triplets and I almost wish I had had a multiple that had survived so I didn?t have to go through all the messing for more than one pregnancy.
I had a call from Mum yesterday with Tink?s suggestions for names. We have her own full name, Me B? and Five B?. She also likes Carla and Sîan. I feel that I have a lot to live up to with Tink having such a pretty name and I?m worried that I may not be able to match it.
I think I was tested for GBS last time, I had a swab weekly that I did myself, no one ever told me what it was for and I think it might be that. I was supposed to be on a GBS study but it was for term healthy pregnancies by vaginal delivery. It?s an infection that is found in a lot of people and normally doesn?t do anything but it can pass to the baby if it?s active at the time of delivery, if they know you have it they can put you on an AB drip to prevent it passing. The reason the result varies LBB is because it depends if it?s active at the time. The study I was part of was giving back an instant result so they knew straight away if they had to treat it. As it stands if it is negative you aren?t treated but you could have it without realizing and then it becomes active just before you go into labour.
MrsY the prodding the pubic bone is a good test, I?ve thought I wasn?t in any pain at all with it at that moment then they?ve prodded to see if I have it and oh boy do I know I do really have pain! It will be around the front of your pubic bone though (or in your hips or dimples) and if it?s going as high as your bump it may not be.
This is my FB post in case anyone missed it:
I've not long got back from another over night stay after getting to 2 minutes again last night. The hospital were so convinced I was going into labour that I was put on nil-by-mouth until the Heparin was out of my system (for about 7 hours) in case I had to have a GA.
Things settled down and I was taken off nil-by-mouth early. I had a planned scan this morning and things aren't looking good. FiFi has only gained 2oz in the last 2 weeks and has fallen further off the chart, they're now saying she is IUGR. I have another growth scan in two weeks and three scans a week for monitoring in the meantime. If the situation doesn't improve she could be coming out early. They have booked me in for three weeks (three weeks??? Can you believe it!) for my elective section but if, as I said, the IUGR doesn't improve or I go into labour for real they will be upgrading me to an emergency section.
We are in bit of a balancing act now, if I go into labour they will have to take her out quickly, but they must wait till I am in labour so it's not too soon and then they have to Crash me so that I don't go into established labour.
I believe the reason I have gotten so far is because FiFi is so small. She's only a few oz bigger than Tink was so I don't think my body has clocked that I've gone as far as I have.