Thanks cookie I know I'm being irrational to worry but also...
Yes, private betsy. In my experience the NHS won't do one early without good cause to worry (e.g. bleeding) which is fair enough given the crunch.
senza obviously it's a personal decision and I wouldn't criticize anyone for making whatever choice for their birth. I do think it's unfair to suggest that home birth is inherently dangerous though. After all, in the UK, you'll have 1-2 midwives looking after you at home while in a hospital you might have 2 between 30 due to staffing shortages (this was my experience as I got taken back in a week after the birth with a suspected infection and that was what the staffing was on the maternity ward at the time). Moreover, birth in this country is low risk iat least partly because of the universality of antenatal care, which includes screening people for where they give birth and spotting high/low risk pregnancies before labour. Yes, there are things that can go wrong suddenly wherever you are, but the actual risk level has to be balanced against reducing other risks (e.g. of unnecessary c-sections) and costs to the NHS (ward stays) and other positive / negative outcomes (tearing, bf rates, whatever you want to count). As an example, at the MLU they reckoned it took the same time to get someone into the OR at the county hospital as from the ward there, because you still have to get the team together so actually the level of crisis is not really the limiting factor.
I am just really really glad I'm not on the NICE commission as it's hard enough figuring out the right thing to do for ME never mind recommendations for the rest of the country!