[quote Edenember]@itwillallbeokay
It seems implausible to me that the same people who’d be pro-immigration (as I am), and perhaps who are children of immigrant parents, are weirdly nationalistic, divisive and separatist about the resultant cultural enrichment. Most people would see that as one of many positives.
Francis is from the late Latin Francisco, meaning the Frenchman (!) and ultimately from the Germanic (eek-cultural appropriation??!!) tribe of the Franks, so named because of their spears.
St. Francis of Assisi popularized the name and feminine variants in WesternChristian Catholic Europe, he was born Giovanni but his father nicknamed him Francesco due to his admiration for the French (!!!). Is this problematic?
There is no such thing as a ‘pure breed’ Englishman. England, as island nation, is and always has been a melting pot due to a high density of invasions - angles, Saxon’s, jutes, Picts, celts, Normans, Vikings, the Spanish Armada, and, indeed, Romans. We spent a significant amount of time governed by Latin speakers, fgs. Indo-European languages share common ancestors, among them the classics (Latin and Ancient Greek), and all of these numerous contributing threads is why the English language is so rich, and has the greatest number of near-synonyms in the world.
If you feel able to speak about cultural and linguistic purity, maybe you should (to use what I predict would be your own language), check your privilege when speaking to people who can never stake a claim to such a thing?
There is no such thing as a ‘pure breed’ Englishman. Go back far enough, and we are all immigrants. This is why Nationalistic fervour is based on such bollocks, it’s such baseless and ignorant pride. Heritage is never clear-cut, ‘pure,’ or reason to feel particularly special.
Then there is our religious cultural heritage, of which the successful spread of Roman Catholicism played a massive part. If we were like you, we could claim similar injury from your denial of our religious cultural heritage.
Op, don’t listen to these people. They’ve worked out that oppression = currency, it’s a power dynamic designed to make you walk on eggshells for something as innocuous as naming your baby, of course they can be choose to be offended but the reality is that not many people are that much of a twat as to choose to feel personally upset about what another person calls their baby. To my mind, the grossest thing about this thread is that the oppression is imagined and appropriating the dynamics of genuine subjugation to win what?? A power play on mumsnet??
Francesca is a lovely name, call your child that if you wish.[/quote]
@Edenember I've already apologised and said I was wrong. All your points are absolutely correct so Thankyou for making them and I have taken the on board.
I felt absolutely battered down with the responses yesterday.
I have been mocked, told my views are laughable, called a toad etc etc
As I've said I will educate my Italian family and lots of Italians I know that we have no right to feel protective over 'our' names.
If you have read the thread I have never said to to OP not to use the name I just made her aware of the cultural implications of using it I.e how some Italians might feel.
Anyway now I have been told by non Italians on this thread that I am wrong and have absolutely no right to feel this way, I have accepted this and I said I will never ever say it again.
I have apologised to the OP for making her aware of it in the first place. Hopefully that's the end of it.