By 'unqualified' I meant an opinion not qualified by the phrase 'in my opinion'. What you think about religion is your opinion.
I see nothing objectionable in Claig's post that you quote. To judge from your comment about it, I suspect you have only a passing acquaintance with any of the tenets of Christianity (any variety), possibly of any other religion either, not to mention, as I gather from your observations about British culture and history, the basic facts of the history of your own country.
It is a fact that a man named Jesus died on a cross. The Romans kept records. And the fact is that the writings about him do state that he died so that sins might be forgiven. Are you trying to reinterpret the New Testament? Are you really arguing that the Gospels do not state that Jesus died for the forgiveness of sins? You have a right to take issue with the idea that Jesus died for this particular reason, or that he rose from the dead. But what is written about him is widely accepted as being reasonably contemporary, and reasonably accurate historically (dates, etc). The writings are a fact.
I referred to 'fairy tales' as mocking. Which I find offensive, yes. Should I not find the mocking of my beliefs offensive? Is it acceptable to mock my beliefs? I don't consider it persecution, btw, nor am I 'whining' about being persecuted as you imply. There's a big difference between finding something offensive and feeling one is being persecuted. I perceive an element of a persecution complex in many of the more heated anti-religion posts on this thread, though.
Really, nobody likes their national anthem, except maybe the French and the Canadians (of whom I have always been envious), but 'hideous'? I'm a dyed in the wool republican (being Irish), but cheerfully stand for God Save The Queen, as a mark of respect for a head of state, as a mark of respect for another state and its people, as a mark of respect for the many hundreds of thousands of British servicemen who gave their lives in past wars under the Union Jack and for the sake of King or Queen and country. To do otherwise would be churlish, imo.