Well I didn't choose to give birth expat, as you bloody well know. I got pregnant by accident.
My mother adopted my two brothers from the UK and she fostered all her life and I can't stand the bloody woman.
My sister also adopted two children and I don't think she should have at all, she's an unfit mother who gives alcohol to her 14yo adoptive dd.
But working with the Good Rock Foundation opened my eyes to all the people who think they can go abroad and adopt from there because the rules are less stringent, because there aren't as many checks, because those children are cuter etc. I don't know what your reasons were Rebecca or anyone on this thread so I won't speculate, but if you've adopted from abroad I'm surprised you aren't aware of the strength of feeling against this practise and why.
Unicef have warned against adopting from abroad because of unscrupulous agencies who aim to make profits out of overseas adoption.
"But the UN children's agency, Unicef, warns that lack of legal oversight in some countries "has spurred the growth of an industry around adoption, where profit, rather than the best interests of children, take centre stage".
It advises against allowing children to be adopted from countries affected by natural disasters, such as the Indian Ocean tsunami, because homes can often be found within their community.
There is a growing awareness worldwide of the potential harm that can be done in uprooting a child from its own culture and taking it to an alien land."
The reason I feel so strongly is because I know that in China a lot of children - girls - were being sold into the sex trade by these so-called adoption agencies. They were handed over to the US and other countries in exchange for money, no questions asked.
So yes I did deliberately offend. Sorry, but I'm sure that if you care about these children you'll also care about the wider issues affecting them.