'There are towns in England that bear no resemblance in terms of their population by race to what they did 20 years ago. That is a fact that matters to many a BNP supporter I am sure. Does that mean they are racist or are there other possible explanations? '
If your convern is for the effects of immigration on resources etc then that is not racist
If your concern is that are too many immigrants becuase you don't like their culttures, that is racist
It's a clear difference really; its quite possible to be concerned abbout immigration without being racist but if at any point you decide to join an organisation that is racist (come on people- KKK? NF?) then you step over to that also. It's quite possible to be racist by association.
Why should toewns resemble 20 yaers ago? I remember my home own then, blimey even the Police cars went in threes (one main, one back up and the other to sit on the edge of the estate because the locals had a stinger device, that spare could whip in and evecuate the PCs if the cars disabled). Homophobia was rife, racism was the norm and single mothers were the sum of the earth (Yep, provincial England roots, me). Twenty yuears ago wasn't some idyliic chocolate box scene, and time changes things. There are a few valid reasons to look at immigration rates, such as space and reasources, but looking like 20 years ago IMO isn't one.
There is a british type IMO, its a loose concept though and it encompases being welcoming and willing to welcome people when they are in need. I get that a lot of immigrants are financial migrants, but somehow I don't think the BNP has a wide concept of asylum seeker or would be very welcoming. Gay person from Iraqn facing execution? double horror off you go...... after all they state on their website they would send UAS (unaccompanied asylum seekers- aka children) back home, presumably alone to face whatever horrorsd they were escaping from.
Nope, my concept of Britishness is culturally variable, and has standing up for those in need at the very core.