Scared - I appreciate that measles at 12 is probably very difficult to having it as a young child as I did.
I also remember mumps being pretty hideous (over Christmas when I was about 6), and also had very bad whooping cough as there had been concerns about the vaccination for that and my parents had decided not to let me have it. My lung collapsed, I was off school for 2 months and had to go to hospital for physio twice a week, so I don't raise the issue lightly.
It just galls me that those of us who are reluctant to 'toe the line' are often the butt of a lot of negativity, when to me, and I'm sure many others, I feel it is wrong that we supposedly live in a 'free' country, but NHS health professionals are not allowed to advise as they see fit, but have to conform to government guidelines, which are at least partially there for the sake of economics.
My HV was not 'allowed' to give me contact for private clinics, when I decided I wanted DD to have separate jabs, but when it came to her boosters recently, and I told the nurse I was considering having the triple for that as DD was older, they told me they completely disregard any private vaccinations, and my DD would have to have 2 lots of MMR as a result.
Because I was made redundant earlier in the year, we can't afford to have the separate jabs at the moment, and there is no way on earth I am letting DD to go to my local GP's where she will end up having another 2 lots of MMR on top of the set she has already had.
If the powers that be, would at least support parents freedom of choice, by providing information about separate jabs and private clinics, rather than assuming we are imbeciles that need to be dictated to about ou children's wlefare, I suspect more people who don't like the idea of the triple jab would opt for private jabs sooner, thus bringing the level of protection up again.
Sorry for the rant - it's a subject close to my heart (as you may have guessed!)