Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be pissed off that the head teacher has banned nutella in the school for one child?

332 replies

eddiejo · 06/10/2008 21:21

The story.... one boy (hers) has allergy to nuts so now nutella is banned . I totally understand the whole anaphlaxis thing but as mum to year 1 boy with multiple food allergies - i would never expect the rest of the school to stop eating what he is allergic to.

Nutella was one of the few spreads which he could eat and made the bread edible. not healthy I know but more important to get energy in him.

What do you think?

OP posts:
charchargabor · 06/10/2008 21:23

Well seeing as you can be affected by others eating nuts if you have a severe allergy, I think YABU I'm afraid. I can see what you mean though.

lulumama · 06/10/2008 21:23

YABU if that one child could die if he came into contact with nuts/nutella or could have severe anaphylaxis

children can manage without nutella, if your child has multiple allergies, surely you can understand?

peanut butter has been banned at DSs school and rightly so IMO. although as DS has a peanut allergy i am biased

Fimbo · 06/10/2008 21:24

YABU

Saturn74 · 06/10/2008 21:24

I think if a food has the potential to kill a child, then everyone, including all the other parents need to support any measures to keep that child safe.

It's a no brainer.

Fadge · 06/10/2008 21:24

YABU

I would have thought you would have had a bit more sympathy tbh given your own circs.

Fimbo · 06/10/2008 21:25

In ds's school peanut butter is banned too and one teacher has a severe reaction to tuna, so no-one in her class is allowed tuna either.

SmugColditz · 06/10/2008 21:25

clearly you don't understand the nature of anaphylaxis as well as you think you do.

unfitmother · 06/10/2008 21:25

YABU

2point4kids · 06/10/2008 21:25

I assume its because that boy could die if someone eats nutella near him.
I'm guessing that your childs allergies are not fatal and thats why the rest of the school may continue eating what he is allergic to.

Grammaticus · 06/10/2008 21:26

As I understand it, severe nut allergy can be triggered by just being in the same room as nuts. So yes, YABU. But I doubt banning Nutella is going to prevent all problems if the child's allergy is that severe. I assume peanut butter was already banned?

darkpunk · 06/10/2008 21:26

yabu...the child could die.

MaloryDontDiveItsShallow · 06/10/2008 21:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaloryDontDiveItsShallow · 06/10/2008 21:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Saturn74 · 06/10/2008 21:27

Just re-read OP and title.

Are you annoyed because the child with the allergy is the son of the HT, and you feel this is preferential treatment?

If so,

mumto2andnomore · 06/10/2008 21:27

Of course YABU ! The school are being very responsible- good on them.

Beachcomber · 06/10/2008 21:28

Sorry but I don't think you do really understand 'the whole anaphylaxis thing' if this is pissing you off.

Think of it as an opportunity to get your DS to eat properly or to examine any real food phobias he might have.

wannaBe · 06/10/2008 21:28

I thought that nut alergies were generally peanuts? Nutela contains hazelnuts.

I can sort of see the motivation but tbh there are steps that could be taken that would avoid the child coming into contact with nuts - no sharing of food etc being crucial. The child doesn't have to come into contact with nutela.

Is the ban specifically on nutela - could you send in a different, non-branded chocolate spread instead?

cikecaka · 06/10/2008 21:29

Why is there 2 threads going on this topic.

expatinscotland · 06/10/2008 21:29

FFS. they ban hot foods in lunchboxes for health and safety reasons. ban all snacks in lunchboxes but fruit. ban nutella. ban tuna. ban peanut butter. close school kitchens left right and centre.

why not just starve tehm all day, then no one gets hurt?

YANBU.

onlyjoking9329 · 06/10/2008 21:30

of course you are being unreasonable.
i fail to see how getting energy into your DS is more important than preventing the death of a child.

Kbear · 06/10/2008 21:30

Ours is a nut-free school. Except the head of course!!

I happily give my kids nut-free stuff if it stops another kid having an allergic reaction. It's not difficult.

NorthernLurker · 06/10/2008 21:31

Beachcomber are you kidding? The op does not have a child with food phobias! She has a child with food allergies. I'm sure she is already doing everything she can but she's looking at a limited menu.

Kbear · 06/10/2008 21:31

And the healthy packed lunch police will be giving you a fixed penalty notice for CHOCOLATE SPREAD SANDWICHES - shock horror!!

phdlife · 06/10/2008 21:31

you know, there was a kid in Australia who died recently

because he was anaphylactic to nuts and a kid who'd been eating them yelled in his face. the nut oil on his breath, breathed in by the allergic kid, was enough to do it.

so yes, sorry, yabu.

nut allergy can be to groundnuts, treenuts, or both.

SmugColditz · 06/10/2008 21:32

why don't you get a nut free version/

Swipe left for the next trending thread