Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

My husband wants me to pay his ex’s share of school fees

1000 replies

CheeseSheep · 30/10/2026 11:45

DH thinks I should contribute towards his eldest daughter’s school fees and I’m really not sure if I’m being unreasonable here.

We’ve been together eight years, married for six. We have two DDs together, aged 7 and 5, and he has a daughter from his previous marriage who is now 13. She was five when we got together so I’ve known her most of her life really. We get on fine, she’s a nice enough girl and I have never had any issue with her being part of our family, but we’re not particularly mother and daughter if that makes sense.

His eldest currently goes to a state school, because her mum has never been particularly keen on private education. Our two girls go to an independent school, which is the one DH has now suggested his eldest should move to. The fees for DD1 are £22,140 a year and DD2’s are £19,080 as she’s in a younger year group. The fee for DSD would be £31,500 but could possibly get a 10% sibling discount, so it’s not even exactly the same amount as the girls.

Apparently she’s been having a difficult time socially at her current school and has been asking about moving. I don’t know all the ins and outs as obviously I’m not involved in the day to day school stuff, but DH thinks a fresh start would be good for her. I haven’t disagreed with that at all.

The problem is he’s now decided that the school our girls attend would be the best option. He spoke to his ex about it and she’s apparently not against her moving, but she doesn’t want to pay private school fees and says she can’t afford them anyway. DH says he can cover most of it but there would still be a shortfall and has suggested I pay towards that. He hasn’t actually said an exact figure yet, but from what I can work out it would be around £10,000 a year after what he says he can pay.

I was a bit taken aback if I’m honest. I work full time in property management and earn a good salary. DH earns considerably more than me through his business. We have a joint account for household expenses but keep our own savings separate. I’ve always been quite careful about having my own money and I don’t think that’s particularly unusual. I have no problem with DH spending his money on his daughter, he’s always done that and I wouldn’t expect anything different. But I don’t see why my savings should now be used to pay her school fees.

DH says I’m looking at this completely the wrong way. His argument is that our girls benefit from his income and that because we’re married, all three children should be treated equally. He said he doesn’t understand how I can be happy paying for our girls’ education but suddenly have an issue when it’s his eldest. I said that’s not the same thing as I’m their mother and their education is something we decided on together. He thinks that’s a horrible distinction to make.

What has made it more awkward is that his daughter apparently knows about the possible move and I don’t want her thinking she’s somehow less important or that I don’t want her at the same school. I’d be perfectly happy for her to come here if DH and her mum can sort out the fees. I’m not trying to exclude her.

But equally I don’t think it’s fair for DH to decide on a private school and then expect me to make up the difference because her mum doesn’t want to pay for one. Surely that’s something he needs to work out himself?

He’s now saying I’m being selfish and making a distinction between the children that he would never make. Am I being unreasonable to refuse to contribute? I feel like I’ve been put in a really uncomfortable position.

OP posts:
ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 19:03

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 18:59

I agree with not blending and it resulting in shafting, but there is no way OP is getting shafted here. Even his proposal - if she agreed - doesn't move her to shouldering half of her own dc's fees - and for years she has only had to contribute 25 percent.

You don't marry someone wealthier than you so you can shaft his existing DC while paying 25 percent of your own dc's costs.

ETA extraordinary that you see her as being shafted.

Edited

So you don’t think DH had anything to do with wanting his DC to go to private school the ? This was all on OP ? She earns a third of what he does and pays proportionately. His child from a former marriage is not OP’s responsibility - especially when the child’s’ own mother is refusing to pay.

DarkForces · 30/10/2026 19:03

Icecreamisthebest · 30/10/2026 18:59

@CheeseSheep as a starting point I think you need to rethink how much you are contributing towards your own Dads education. Because if you are solely responsible for lunches, uniform and extras then based on their current annual fees you are paying much closer to half than a quarter.

Your DH sounds very manipulative. Calling you selfish for not wanting to pay towards a decision you have no part of? I can’t believe he is not aware that you are paying much more than a quarter of your DDs school costs. And he is happy to allow that. He is coming across like someone who puts himself first.

He has several options here. He can pay himself. He can look at another school. He can investigate bursaries. He can use some of the money that has been put away for DSDs future. He can talk to his ex again about what she can contribute or dropping his maintenance to cms levels to make up her contribution to the fees.

But instead all he is doing is trying to manipulate you into covering the cost. If you do this, about half your income is going to school costs. Can he say the same?

You forgot one - He can move all 3 of his children into state education

Noscrubss · 30/10/2026 19:03

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 19:02

So is she responsible for 50 percent of her own dc's? Because that might be what she now needs to pay.

His offer works out in her favour over shouldering her share of her own children's educations.

Exactly. If ex is responsible for half DSD school fees then surely op should be responsible for half the fees for each of her children?

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 19:03

Noscrubss · 30/10/2026 19:03

I think what's grim is op starting a family with a man who already has a child and then resenting him still spending money on that child.

This child came along first. Op started a relationship knowing there was already a child and should have swiftly determined that if she started a family with this man then they should ensure the existing child's standard of living wasn't diminished and that all 3 would be treated equally.

resenting him still spending money on that child.

Exactly, And he's only trying to give her what OP's already have - and for a shorter duration.

Awkwardisfunny · 30/10/2026 19:05

Noscrubss · 30/10/2026 19:03

I think what's grim is op starting a family with a man who already has a child and then resenting him still spending money on that child.

This child came along first. Op started a relationship knowing there was already a child and should have swiftly determined that if she started a family with this man then they should ensure the existing child's standard of living wasn't diminished and that all 3 would be treated equally.

Existing child's standard of living isn't diminished. OP isn't taking anything away. That child can continue in state schools. The father and mother are the only ones who need to be discussing finances and plans for the child.

If the father were widowed, that would completely change things for me because I'd be adopting that child and they would, as far as they wanted, just be my child.

ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 19:06

arethereanyleftatall · 30/10/2026 18:45

That’s interesting, and patently unfair, as what it costs to look after this particular child in this particular family, given private school at £30k a year for her siblings - 1250 a month doesn’t even touch the sides.

CMS aren’t interested in private school fees. There’s nothing unfair about the maintenance arrangement - he pays more than CMS would ask. The child also has a whopping savings fund - do the other two children have the same ?

kkloo · 30/10/2026 19:06

Awkwardisfunny · 30/10/2026 19:03

Absolutely not. Your other children only benefit from the income of two parents, not three. Your partner needs to speak to his daughter's mother again and if they can't afford it together, then either he pays or he gives up on the idea of private school. She can move schools without going to private school.

How fucking cheeky to ask you to pay for another woman's child - has he not considered how that makes you feel? Bad enough you have to share him forever with another woman due to his existing children, but asking you to cover her financial responsibilities? Not a chance.

You could potentially offer to loan the money to his ex. Ask for a claim to her house or for a guarantor until it's repaid. Set your interest rate and get everything in writing. Throw the ball back to her.

What do you mean throw it back to her? She's not the one who wanted them to go in the first place and isn't pushing for them to go.

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 19:06

He has phrased it poorly in that he should have said "I am going to need you to contribute something a little closer to 50 percent for our shared children's fees.

The suggestion that he pays 75 percent of theirs and she pays something toward the DD1 has got people confused that he is asking her to pay for that child,

He isn't. He's asking her to pay closer to her fair share of her own children's fees so he can do the right thing for his other DD.

Forget the idea you are paying for her op: you are just paying more than 25 percent for your own. His finances have changed.

squarecrow · 30/10/2026 19:07

YANBU to see them differently - of course he sees them all the same, they are all his aren’t they? They are not all yours and he’s very naive if he thinks you shouldn’t distinguish your feelings from yours to not yours. It doesn’t mean you don’t care about her; but you don’t see her as your responsibility because she isn’t.

Still… if you were paying half of your DDs fees, that would be about the same as what you pay now plus what he’s asking you to pay for his DD. Is there nothing DSD’s mum could contribute? £5k? Then you could maybe up your contribution to your own DDs by £5k?

I’m not entirely sure where all of his money is going though, if he gets £180k after tax. So why can’t he cover it?

eta: if you had DSD 50/50, your DH wouldn’t have to pay maintenance anymore so could he cover it then? Would it be acceptable to all involved if she moved in 50/50?

Bridesmaidorexfriend · 30/10/2026 19:07

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 30/10/2026 14:48

Ultimately, I think there are three possible solutions here.

The first is that the DH pulls funding for all private school fees and all of the kids go to state. The DH would need to set aside an equivalent amount for his eldest daughter to offset the expenditure that has already been invested for the younger kids.

The second is that the DH stops funding the younger two, sets aside an equivalent amount for his eldest daughter to offset the expenditure already invested in the younger two, and the OP funds 100% school fees for the younger two from now.

And the third option is to explain to dsd that dad can only fund private education for any of his kids if their respective mums are also willing and able to chip in. And as her own mum isn't willing or able, he will instead set aside an equivalent amount to what has been invested in education for each of the younger children, which he will add to at the same rate as he continues to invest in the other kids, in a dedicated high interest account that she will be able to access when she is an adult for a house deposit or whatever else she might need.

Of course, the younger siblings may be cheesed off when they're older to find that dsd has a sizeable house deposit whereas they don't, but if things can't be perfectly fair and equal due to their mothers having different resources and priorities, then they will just have to suck it up in the same way that dsd will have to suck up not being given the opportunity to go to private school.

Personally, if he sets aside the same money for her future that he spends on education for the others, I think she will come out with the better end of the deal.

Edited

OP is only paying 25% of her own child’s fees. We know nothing of his exes finances

MsMacheath · 30/10/2026 19:08

CheeseSheep · 30/10/2026 12:09

We split them based on our incomes, DH earns considerably more than me so he pays the larger share although I do contribute. I also pay the compulsory school lunches for both girls and their extra curricular clubs, so it’s not like I don’t pay anything.

I’m not saying I don’t benefit from his income, I obviously do, and I’m not suggesting he should pay for absolutely everything. But there’s a difference between contributing towards the education of the children we have together and being expected to pay towards his daughter’s fees when she has two parents of her own. Maybe that sounds awful but that’s honestly how I see it.

It does sound awful. He should stop paying for your daughters or reduce what he's paying for your daughters.

Noscrubss · 30/10/2026 19:08

Awkwardisfunny · 30/10/2026 19:05

Existing child's standard of living isn't diminished. OP isn't taking anything away. That child can continue in state schools. The father and mother are the only ones who need to be discussing finances and plans for the child.

If the father were widowed, that would completely change things for me because I'd be adopting that child and they would, as far as they wanted, just be my child.

If my dad started paying for private school for younger siblings I would fully expect him to also cough up for mine

The point about standard of living not diminishing was in reference to op seemingly begrudge the payments towards maintenance and school trips. If your dad is earning £240k you would definitely expect to be going on school trips.

ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 19:08

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 19:03

resenting him still spending money on that child.

Exactly, And he's only trying to give her what OP's already have - and for a shorter duration.

I don’t think that’s where OP’s resentment comes from. It’s the fact that she’s being asked to pay because the childs’ own mother won’t.

Whatisbest26 · 30/10/2026 19:09

Is there a chance that he’ll end up paying 100% for his daughter and then less for your shared children? If that happens, you’ll have to subsidy your own daughters so it might work out the same anyway.

Tricky.

kkloo · 30/10/2026 19:11

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 18:59

I agree with not blending and it resulting in shafting, but there is no way OP is getting shafted here. Even his proposal - if she agreed - doesn't move her to shouldering half of her own dc's fees - and for years she has only had to contribute 25 percent.

You don't marry someone wealthier than you so you can shaft his existing DC while paying 25 percent of your own dc's costs.

ETA extraordinary that you see her as being shafted.

Edited

Op pays around 10k of the fees, she also pays another 4-5k herself for their lunches, uniforms, extra curriculars and trips.
He wants her to pay another 10k, possibly the other 2.5k aswell

So she'd be more than covering 50%.
And also paying nearly half her income on school fees. She only has 18k savings so this would be decimated in no time.

Meanwhile he gets to keep his savings...

ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 19:11

Calliopespa · 30/10/2026 19:06

He has phrased it poorly in that he should have said "I am going to need you to contribute something a little closer to 50 percent for our shared children's fees.

The suggestion that he pays 75 percent of theirs and she pays something toward the DD1 has got people confused that he is asking her to pay for that child,

He isn't. He's asking her to pay closer to her fair share of her own children's fees so he can do the right thing for his other DD.

Forget the idea you are paying for her op: you are just paying more than 25 percent for your own. His finances have changed.

Edited

You think it’s fair that they pay 50/50 when he earns three times what OP does ?

ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 19:12

kkloo · 30/10/2026 19:11

Op pays around 10k of the fees, she also pays another 4-5k herself for their lunches, uniforms, extra curriculars and trips.
He wants her to pay another 10k, possibly the other 2.5k aswell

So she'd be more than covering 50%.
And also paying nearly half her income on school fees. She only has 18k savings so this would be decimated in no time.

Meanwhile he gets to keep his savings...

Exactly this. A lot of posters are only seeing what they want to see.

hotmumshit · 30/10/2026 19:12

Glowingup · 30/10/2026 13:23

And “she’s nice enough”. Flying the flag for the evil stepmother trope big time.

Exactly, a girl you've known since 5, is nice enough.

Ive been that kid - horrible.

hotmumshit · 30/10/2026 19:13

ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 13:38

Being married to her dad doesn’t make the child OP’s. She didn’t give birth to her - the ex wife did. So how is it that OP is being asked to contribute but the bio mother can duck out of it ? Why isn’t DH putting her under pressure ?

She cant afford it. This woman can. This is for the girl shes known since 5. Nobody forced the op to have two more kids with a man who already has one.

God, poor girl.

Hoardasurass · 30/10/2026 19:18

CheeseSheep · 30/10/2026 15:38

Sorry, I should have made that clearer. Those figures are after tax, but before any of our other bills, mortgage etc are paid.

The 75/25 split is based on that. We worked it out between ourselves and both thought it was fair.

Tbh by the time you include the meals, uniform and trips your split is actually 33% to you and 66% to your husband

EightSteps · 30/10/2026 19:18

OP, regardless of how this school fee situarion gets resolved, I do hope that you can address the mismatch in your respective savings.
I find it staggering that you 'only' have 18k with 240k household take home. Unless you have other joint savings which you haven't mentioned, of course.

ThreadGuardDog · 30/10/2026 19:18

hotmumshit · 30/10/2026 19:13

She cant afford it. This woman can. This is for the girl shes known since 5. Nobody forced the op to have two more kids with a man who already has one.

God, poor girl.

The mum says she can’t afford it. She’s also against private schools so we only have her word for that.

Marieb19 · 30/10/2026 19:18

What is can't understand is why his ex doesn't beleive she should contribute anything? I assume she works and has an income. I think your dh is unreasonable expecting you to contribute when her real mum won't. With a net income of 240k, your family probably are in a position to pay the fees but if your savings are used I think it would be reasonable to demand a commitment that the amount will be returned to you.

FancyKeyboard · 30/10/2026 19:19

I wouldn't use your savings (their are yours/historical) but if you can contribute a bit more from your salary that might work.

Chilly80 · 30/10/2026 19:21

Did you say she was in year 9? So if she moved in January it would be 2 years and 2 terms of costs, at least. Can she go to a non fee paying college? If so its a limited number of years to pay. Could you offer a smaller amount like £250 a month? I don't think you should use your savings. If DH starts paying the fees can he reduce the child maintenance amount since his ex isn't contributing?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.