Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if you watched Andy Burnham’s bloody good speech?

758 replies

Househunt2026 · 30/09/2026 21:48

As in actually watched it and didn’t just doom scroll the commentary? It was bold and honest and pragmatic and actually made me hopeful that we have someone at the helm with a vision for a better tomorrow who has Britain’s best interests at heart.

The National Care Service is a masterstroke, paid for out of scrapping the triple lock and the very real savings of reducing NHS bills on A&E and hospital beds for elderly who should be in care but have nowhere to go.

Scrapping right to buy and increasing council control of housing, boosting the technical education track for young people, pushing renewables, nuclear and energy sovereignty, public control of key utilities for water to get bills down and reduce pollution, investing in people & getting them back to work, leasehold reform by Christmas and everyone’s energy bill will be reduced by fast tracking decoupling energy prices from global gas pricing and by having no VAT on energy bills by TOMORROW!

You can watch the whole thing here and be directly informed instead of getting your perspective filtered through all the bots and misinformation peddlers online m.youtube.com/watch?v=jyjTT_55Gi0

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Hedgerowmanager · 01/10/2026 09:21

Hereinmyarms · 01/10/2026 08:56

What, the tories that I just mentioned directly?

Was Starmer a Tory?

Meandthegherkin · 01/10/2026 09:21

I think the discussions on this get skewed by the MN demographic when free university gets brought into it. My parents didn’t go to university. When I went, 20-25% of school leavers went to university. I think it doesn’t feel like this to much of MN because their parents are more likely to have gone to university than across the population in general.

DrudgeJedd · 01/10/2026 09:21

Hereinmyarms · 01/10/2026 09:11

I also don’t have a lot of sympathy for the ‘we worked hard’ pensioner brigade who got a free university education while our young people are being completely shafted.

What % of today's pensioners benefited from free university? Less than 15%, do you have any sympathy for the other 85% or not?

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 01/10/2026 09:25

DrudgeJedd · 01/10/2026 09:21

What % of today's pensioners benefited from free university? Less than 15%, do you have any sympathy for the other 85% or not?

But there was a much much better job market then for those who didn’t go to university? Jobs for life pretty much, final salary pensions and the like. A nice bounce from your discounted purchased council house, or even just a massive rise in your house value because of the economy.

Nothing like that currently for our young adults now - and without them earning and paying tax, there will be even less available going forward to pay for the many more, longer lived pensioners coming down the line….

Meandthegherkin · 01/10/2026 09:25

Also, MN appears to be more likely to have rich parents with large pensions. My DM had a £4k state pension and £4k from a joint private pension my self employed DF paid into which paid to DM when DF died. No point in talking to her about looking into credit credit or the like, she’d have been horrified at the thought so didn’t bother.

Hereinmyarms · 01/10/2026 09:28

DrudgeJedd · 01/10/2026 09:21

What % of today's pensioners benefited from free university? Less than 15%, do you have any sympathy for the other 85% or not?

Let’s add in cheap housing, not having to save tens and tens of thousands in deposits, gold plated pensions in many cases.

Its not the fault of young people that they were encouraged to go to uni as their main option while everything else was hollowed out. There are very few apprenticeships or other option. I work with young people so I know exactly how bad things are.

DrudgeJedd · 01/10/2026 09:31

Monty36 · 01/10/2026 09:17

He has now had to get involved. Because of course he was the Mayor of Manchester. He arguably should not. But has made comments about how awful it would be if the Saudi owners of Manchester City were turfed out and found not to be ‘fit and proper’ people to own a club under the FA rules. He should pipe down.

Next, of course, he says they were instrumental in pouring money into Manchester as a city, not just the club.
Next of course, a journalist asks the obvious question as to whether his own involvement with the Saudi’s would stand up to any scrutiny. He says it would.

Not good. You don’t pour money into a City or a club for nothing expected in return.

Is this his Lord Ali moment, he should have just refused to discuss this. He's the PM of the whole country now and shouldn't be bowing & scraping to the owners of a football club (even if they're the rulers of the UAE).

Meandthegherkin · 01/10/2026 09:35

I think it’s easy to flip it on its head though. I never went abroad on holiday (and didn’t have one at all after aged 12), my DM cut my hair until
I was 16, all my clothes came from jumble sales, TV and radios were all second hand. Central heating was quite normal in general I think but we lived rurally and didn’t have it. We never ate out. The idea of living like this to my “I’ll just get myself a grande Frappuccino” DD would be the same as a trip to the moon. I’m not saying her stopping buying tat will buy her a house but her quality of life to date is vastly higher than mine was at her age.

TallSturdyGirls · 01/10/2026 09:35

Isabella70 · 01/10/2026 09:19

Oh they were real tears. But if he hadn't put his father into his speech he probably wouldn't have shed them at that point.

Probably, but I think he wanted to honour his father. And also, the fact that he was delivering the speech in the city where he was born, literally on the street where his father worked and was talking about working class aspirations that drive him and his brother's because of his parents made it entirely relevant. He also would have wanted to honour him given his very recent death.

DrudgeJedd · 01/10/2026 09:37

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 01/10/2026 09:25

But there was a much much better job market then for those who didn’t go to university? Jobs for life pretty much, final salary pensions and the like. A nice bounce from your discounted purchased council house, or even just a massive rise in your house value because of the economy.

Nothing like that currently for our young adults now - and without them earning and paying tax, there will be even less available going forward to pay for the many more, longer lived pensioners coming down the line….

Maybe this was the case where you grew up but in my community of the de-industrialised NE it definitely was not.

TallSturdyGirls · 01/10/2026 09:39

anyolddinosaur · 01/10/2026 09:19

Didnt watch the speech but inspired by the thread started to watch it, didnt get very far. Zero chance of getting dh to watch. I'm politically homeless and not going to vote for a party of fantasists that doesnt protect women's rights. I may not vote at all in the next election. Dh says he's unlikely to vote as no-one worth voting for. We've always voted, even in most local elections. Burnham did well as mayor of Manchester so I'll give him time but I care about actions not words.

The removal of the 2 child benefit cap was a mistake. Cutting WFP for all pensioners was a mistake, then returning it at too high an income level was a bigger one. Triple lock has to go sometime but it needs to be with other measures to reduce debt. There needs to be a much bigger push on housing and on targeting energy saving measures at people who are not on benefits but not much above that level. Renters Rights Act is a bit of a disaster, lots of landlords selling up and rents increasing.

When he talks about what Labour built after 1945 maybe he could remember it was those who are pensioners now who built a good country. It fell apart with Thatcher making greed respectable and selling off anything she could to fund tax cuts and right to buy. A sensible country would have invested the profits from North Sea oil in energy saving and house building.

Few pensioners got a free university education because most pensioners didnt go to university.

Its quite obvious you didnt listen to the whole speech as much of that was addressed.
You are right, though it would be so much better if Thatcherism had never happened. You can tell he wanted to nationalise gas and electric again, but the costs in doing so are just too high.

OneFastPinkTraybake · 01/10/2026 09:41

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 01/10/2026 09:25

But there was a much much better job market then for those who didn’t go to university? Jobs for life pretty much, final salary pensions and the like. A nice bounce from your discounted purchased council house, or even just a massive rise in your house value because of the economy.

Nothing like that currently for our young adults now - and without them earning and paying tax, there will be even less available going forward to pay for the many more, longer lived pensioners coming down the line….

Not everyone chose to buy their council house.

Whyhaveibeencutoutofmamsnot · 01/10/2026 09:42

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 01/10/2026 09:09

So?

Possibly the ingrained guilt of defying the teachings of the church.
A lot of his policies are in line with the Catholic social teaching.

Meandthegherkin · 01/10/2026 09:45

I thought AB said he wanted palliative care sorted first so people had an genuine choice rather than him being completely against AD

Isabella70 · 01/10/2026 09:46

TallSturdyGirls · 01/10/2026 09:35

Probably, but I think he wanted to honour his father. And also, the fact that he was delivering the speech in the city where he was born, literally on the street where his father worked and was talking about working class aspirations that drive him and his brother's because of his parents made it entirely relevant. He also would have wanted to honour him given his very recent death.

He did more than honour his father, he literally used his father's death for political gain, and as I've said above I actually agree with most of what he said. He had the choice not to insert his father into the speech, but he went ahead and did it.

Monty36 · 01/10/2026 09:47

Tony Blair sold university for all and people voted for him to provide it.

Do not blame old people if what he sold everyone was a load of rubbish. He won a landslide. Younger people voted for him too. ie the parents of those going to university now voted for him.

Isabella70 · 01/10/2026 09:48

Hedgerowmanager · 01/10/2026 09:21

Was Starmer a Tory?

Only history will tell.

Whyhaveibeencutoutofmamsnot · 01/10/2026 09:52

The generation who are pensioners now tended to only move out of parental home when they married and had been working for a few years and saving for deposits etc.
The unmarried sibling usually female would stay in parental home and end up caring for parents and would often stay in the home once parents had died.
The younger people now who have been to university don't want to return home and restrictions.

Monty36 · 01/10/2026 09:57

I am wondering how much the Manchester City debacle will impact on him.
As he was the Mayor of Manchester.
He says his relationship with the Saudi’s can stand up to scrutiny.

CandidLurker · 01/10/2026 09:58

@Monty36

just to be a bit pedantic, City’s owners are from Abu Dhabi so Emiratis, not Saudis.

Monty36 · 01/10/2026 10:07

Yes, you are quite right. UAE. Issues are not any different though.

Hereinmyarms · 01/10/2026 10:08

Monty36 · 01/10/2026 09:47

Tony Blair sold university for all and people voted for him to provide it.

Do not blame old people if what he sold everyone was a load of rubbish. He won a landslide. Younger people voted for him too. ie the parents of those going to university now voted for him.

So you are doing exactly what everyone does and blaming young people 🙄

My 18 year old and the 18 year old students I work with every day had fuck all to do with this shitshow. Why should they be saddled with 70k of debt just to improve their lives and prospects?

WhatNextImScared · 01/10/2026 10:08

It was so good. Definitely worth watching in full. The pause 😭

WhatNextImScared · 01/10/2026 10:09

OnlyOneAdda · 30/09/2026 21:57

Fuck my life. Anyone with any basic maths or economics can tell you that moving from a triple lock to a double lock (with caveat to still raise to triple rate in certain circumstance - yes this isn’t a BIG BOLD change) will NOT fund a National Care Service free at the point of service for everyone. It’s depressing that there are people out there that think it will.

Nobody said it would. He’s just said the savings from that will go towards it. The triple lock had to end, and it makes good political sense to tie it to something that mainly benefits the same voting cohort.

OneFastPinkTraybake · 01/10/2026 10:10

Househunt2026 · 30/09/2026 21:48

As in actually watched it and didn’t just doom scroll the commentary? It was bold and honest and pragmatic and actually made me hopeful that we have someone at the helm with a vision for a better tomorrow who has Britain’s best interests at heart.

The National Care Service is a masterstroke, paid for out of scrapping the triple lock and the very real savings of reducing NHS bills on A&E and hospital beds for elderly who should be in care but have nowhere to go.

Scrapping right to buy and increasing council control of housing, boosting the technical education track for young people, pushing renewables, nuclear and energy sovereignty, public control of key utilities for water to get bills down and reduce pollution, investing in people & getting them back to work, leasehold reform by Christmas and everyone’s energy bill will be reduced by fast tracking decoupling energy prices from global gas pricing and by having no VAT on energy bills by TOMORROW!

You can watch the whole thing here and be directly informed instead of getting your perspective filtered through all the bots and misinformation peddlers online m.youtube.com/watch?v=jyjTT_55Gi0

I paid 1 pound 35 in VAT on my last statement. I'll be 14 pounds a year better off. Im in Scotland and scrapping right to buy will do very little for housing at all. In my area there is a house building programme but it's not enough to replace the ones sold off.

Burnham probably didn't write his speech either. He'll have a team who do that for him.