Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think challenging school rules can harm children’s resilience?

253 replies

Teenytinypineapple · 23/09/2026 16:20

AIBU to think that many of those parents who push back against schools and their rules are completely oblivious to the damage they're doing to their children?

The children who do the best are those whose parents instill in them that they should conform. Yes, that will cause difficulties at times. Yes, there will be things they don't like. But that's life. That's how children develop resilience.

Whilst little Timmy and his Mommy are complaining about the school sending him home for wearing the wrong shoes, little Jimmy has learned to suck it up, wear the damn shoes, get his head down and realise it's up to him to make the most of his education.

OP posts:
Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:10

I repeatedly and consistently inform the school that they are wrong. I tell my kids that the primary school is utter shit. I trust my kids to tell me when to intervene
I'm sorry but are THAT parent. What qualifications do you have to decide unilaterally that they are wrong and you are right? I expect none that rivals with all those employed by the school who will much more experience than you in terms of psychological education.

Parents like you are hard to manage because no matter what explanation they take the time to share, it won't be listened to.

I am bemused by the increasing number of children who automatically answer with 'yes but ...' when they are given an explanation without even taking the time to listen and process what they've just heard.

But what hope is there when that's exactly how their parents behave themselves.

Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 10:10

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 08:43

My daughter has just joined year 7 and has had her first ever behaviour point for being 2 mins late to a lesson because she went to the toilet between lessons
That's another lesson we need to help children to learn. Rules are in place for the better of a group. Sometimes the professionals get it wrong or can't separate special circumstances. An unfair decision is the result.

But... that's when we help our kids with resilience. You got behaviour points, is it the end of the world? No. It doesn't have a significant impact on the pupils life. It might feel like it to them. We teach them to rationalise matters. Is it unfair? Yes? Is it so unfair it needs to be dealt with or just move on? If the former, how are you going to deal with it? What evidence are you going to bring up? Etc....

All those life experiences are the exact situations kids need to face to learn to adapt and use critical thinking to set them up for adult life.

Parents taking all this away from them and teaching them instead to moan, complain, mull over the unfairness, act in a victimised way is all doing them the biggest disservice.

The worse part is that instead of giving all children a level start in adult life, it creates the biggest divide by the time they reach adulthood. Those who've learned and adapted and will sail quite peacefully through the transition and those who will never get the chance because they have never been given the chance to learn the necessary skills by their parents.

It is so reassuring to see these sorts of reasoned comments. Thank you.

OP posts:
Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:14

I don't necessarily like the ultra strict ethos and I do think there's an element of breaking their spirt involved in having them apply blindly, but for many complex reasons, schools with the strictest uniform policies do seem to perform best
The problem with strict rules is that it can take away the element of responsibility. I think the best schools are those which not very strict rules but are strict in making sure they are applied.

Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 10:15

Slightyamusedandsilly · Yesterday 08:59

Mostly agree, probably around 90%. Some stuff needs to be challenged (e.g. poor SEN provision, lack of equal rights, lack of inclusivity and diversity).

But absolutely suck it up on uniform whinges, 'teacher is picking on my child' aka a strict teacher etc etc. Nothing in life is going to be easy. Let your child learn some of those lessons at school.

There are definitely situations in which things should be challenged but there are ways and means to do that. None of which entail a child unilaterally deciding they don't like a rule so they won't follow it. That's where we, as parents and carers, step up to advocate for them in an appropriate way. That's what we should be teaching our children.

OP posts:
Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 10:17

Thepeopleversuswork · Yesterday 09:10

But again: how have people arrived at a consensus about what needs to be challenged?

Lack of inclusivity and diversity wasn't a thing 40 years ago. It's only become a consensus because people like parents (and teachers and many others) were bloody minded about insisting it be taken seriously and wouldn't back down.

You don't get to agreed standards about what is right and wrong without some pushback and dissent.

But, as you say, that's teachers and parents pushing for change in an appropriate fashion which is a million miles from parents and children unilaterally deciding which rules they want the child to follow.

OP posts:
Superhansrantowindsor · Yesterday 10:21

Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 07:48

And if you feel so strongly about a rule, gather together your colleagues and take it up with the headteacher / trust. I'd imagine it's somewhere in your employment contract that you will adhere to and ensure the following of by others the school's rules. You allowing certain students a free pass does nothing to help your colleagues who are trying to get them (or others) to adhere to the rules.

It's a thin end of the wedge type of scenario. Get the small stuff right and the big stuff is easier. Why do you think behaviour in public, private and grammar schools is generally so much better than in comprehensive schools? The rules can be much stricter but there's an expectation from parents and teachers alike that they will be followed.

Erm where have I said I give them a free pass? And I have raised my concerns through appropriate channels! Some rules are stupid. It’s very annoying as a class teacher having to enforce stupid rules about blazers for example. My point is that parents complain about rules that are actually pretty good rules.

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:23

Some rules are stupid
How does one ascertain that a rule is worthwhile and others are stupid?

Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 10:26

WeightLossForWalking · Yesterday 09:42

Some of these replies are really naive, impractical and a bit frightening. You're talking about the social contracts which enable us to live and work together! They balance rights in imperfect ways (how can they be perfect and everyone agree?!) that average out as enabling society to function.

To me, it's pretty obvious. Every time any individual child exercises their "right" to challenge/refuse/question/ignore [delete as applicable!], another child loses their corresponding right to hear/focus/progress/enjoy [or equivalent].

As a case in point, in response to a few "He wasn't even allowed to explain..." posts...

Do you know how many kids will need to "explain" something in the first 10 minutes of an average lesson?

The teacher could listen to them all - to why #1, 2 and 3 don't have any pen or pencil (the story often starts at 7am that morning, and may feature the dog and baby bro, so settle in, listeners...), why #5 and 6's laptops aren't charged, why #7 haven't filled their water bottle in break, why #8 absolutely have to deviate from the seating plan and why #9 and 10 haven't done their homework. They could make the other 20 wait and listen, or set them a different activity to the one planned so they can engage (leaving the 5 learning support kids without the usual check-in they'd get at the start of a task).

After that, the teacher could even adjudicate on exactly why #1 and 7s' rationales made sense, whereas #2-6 were less convincing, and #9 and #10 needed to be revisited later (and, of course, deal with the explanations as to why their decision's wrong... and also hear the sudden interventions of #11 and 12, who overhears and - understandably - realises they're in a similar position to #1 and #7 so should assert their right to explain, too...)

Or they could refuse to engage with any of them (hoping angry parent calls and emails wouldn't get in the way of 3 hours' GCSE marking and the meeting to counsel little Sarah that afternoon).

Sure, if there's something worth fighting, a genuine injustice, challenge it - but do so in an appropriate way that doesn't force corresponding injustices on other students! Or that sets a precedent where your child's right to "explain" undermines the whole damn system necessary to support the majority.

You think the uniform rules are wrong from a financial POV? That's a great cause - take it up! But involving your kid any more than informing them you're doing it and to standby isn't productive or fair on them, other kids or their teachers.

You think the uniforms are wrong from a point of principle, though?! Well, you could encourage a righteous campaign of civil disobedience that disregards other parents' agreement with the policy and interferes with other kids. You could also insist the Head steps away from that safeguarding paperwork to explain the rationale behind the school's uniform policy to you, personally, in depth. Or you could just accept that living in a society means disagreement and compromise (and not bring up a kid to be more likely to queue jump on the basis that they know they're in more of a justified rush than the other randoms quietly waiting - or more likely to apply words like "fascist" to strict uniform rules so such words lose their meaning and impact when they're really needed to distinguish real horrors).

Edited

I would to "love" this ten times over. Absolutely spot on. Bigger picture. Much bigger picture.

OP posts:
Superhansrantowindsor · Yesterday 10:26

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:23

Some rules are stupid
How does one ascertain that a rule is worthwhile and others are stupid?

Common sense.

Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 10:30

ToffeePennie · Yesterday 09:42

Yeah, I’m sorry but that is BS. I call them out for their appalling bullying, you want my kids to just conform? What! That’s crazy.
I repeatedly and consistently inform the school that they are wrong. I tell my kids that the primary school is utter shit. I trust my kids to tell me when to intervene.
I also tell my children to listen to their teachers if they are actually teaching. I tell my youngest that things will improve in secondary school. I tell my kids that uniform violations, whilst stupid, are what we have agreed to.
It’s stupid policies I object too, not the sensible ones!

Oh Christ. They walk among us.

How the hell is your primary school aged child equipped to analyse and decide whether their (adult, educated, experienced) teacher is "actually teaching".

And what are your qualifications to decide what is and what isn't a "stupid policy"?

I imagine your children are a complete pain in the arse and waste so much of their school's time and resources. That, of itself, is selfish but in the end it will be your children who suffer the most and you won't realise until it's too late.

OP posts:
OrchardOwl · Yesterday 10:31

What? No, it doesn’t harm a child to challenge school rules. You are overthinking it. Think about all the adults you know. They all had a different upbringing, some were taught to challenge rules they don’t agree with, and others were taught that it’s important to obey those in authority, and the vast majority of them ended up as functional adults. On the other hand, two siblings with exactly the same upbringing might end up with vastly different values and beliefs as an adult. The way you bring up your child doesn’t matter as much as you think it does.

Greengage1983 · Yesterday 10:34

Very much depends on the school rule. Were you told you're not allowed makeup and you came in made up like a clown and told to wash it off? Well go and wash it off then. (I say this as someone who used to occasionally push the uniform rules at school but accepted the punishments if I got caught). Were you told no eating in the corridors but you ate your packet of crisps anyway? Just take your detention ffs and stop whining.

But, were you told your school skirt was too short, but the official uniform supplier only sells skirts in one length??? Are you in nursery or reception, and your uniform is permanently stained from the activities the school made you do whilst wearing the uniform they make you wear??? Did one teacher tell you one thing, then another teacher punished you for doing what the first teacher said? Did the school arbitrarily change the uniform rules on sock colours mid-year, without telling anyone or writing it in the uniform policy or school website? (all real examples). Then no, we are challenging those rules, maturely and respectfully.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 10:35

Greengage1983 · Yesterday 10:34

Very much depends on the school rule. Were you told you're not allowed makeup and you came in made up like a clown and told to wash it off? Well go and wash it off then. (I say this as someone who used to occasionally push the uniform rules at school but accepted the punishments if I got caught). Were you told no eating in the corridors but you ate your packet of crisps anyway? Just take your detention ffs and stop whining.

But, were you told your school skirt was too short, but the official uniform supplier only sells skirts in one length??? Are you in nursery or reception, and your uniform is permanently stained from the activities the school made you do whilst wearing the uniform they make you wear??? Did one teacher tell you one thing, then another teacher punished you for doing what the first teacher said? Did the school arbitrarily change the uniform rules on sock colours mid-year, without telling anyone or writing it in the uniform policy or school website? (all real examples). Then no, we are challenging those rules, maturely and respectfully.

In 1988 we were told we couldn’t wear short shorts because we’d get pregnant.

schools really aren’t that smart, something the passage of time easily demonstrates

Greengage1983 · Yesterday 10:37

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 10:35

In 1988 we were told we couldn’t wear short shorts because we’d get pregnant.

schools really aren’t that smart, something the passage of time easily demonstrates

Edited

Bloody hell 😂

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:41

Common sense
But your answer likes common sense! Or are you inferring that what is common sense to YOU is the right answer?

I think children under the age of 6 should be in bed no later than 6pm. You think they are fine going to bed at 8pm.

Which one is common sense?

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:44

They all had a different upbringing, some were taught to challenge rules they don’t agree with, and others were taught that it’s important to obey those in authority, and the vast majority of them ended up as functional adults
Well actually I think it's the opposite argument. Children more than ever challenge any rules and more than ever, we are getting young adults who are out of work because they can't adapt to working environments, and increase mental health issues because they can't adapt to society.

So no, I don't think most are doing fine.

inerja · Yesterday 10:50

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:41

Common sense
But your answer likes common sense! Or are you inferring that what is common sense to YOU is the right answer?

I think children under the age of 6 should be in bed no later than 6pm. You think they are fine going to bed at 8pm.

Which one is common sense?

Sorry to derail but how on earth do you get a 5 year old to bed for 6pm?! What time are you getting them up in the morning?

inerja · Yesterday 10:51

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:44

They all had a different upbringing, some were taught to challenge rules they don’t agree with, and others were taught that it’s important to obey those in authority, and the vast majority of them ended up as functional adults
Well actually I think it's the opposite argument. Children more than ever challenge any rules and more than ever, we are getting young adults who are out of work because they can't adapt to working environments, and increase mental health issues because they can't adapt to society.

So no, I don't think most are doing fine.

Yes blame the kids rather than late stage capitalism. You should go and read about Japan and what’s happening there. Gig economies, no security, lack of prospects. No wonder ours are giving up and opting out.

OrchardOwl · Yesterday 10:51

People are out of work because the system is fucked, because of overpopulation, AI, zero hour contracts, etc. not because they can’t cope. Some of my colleagues are in their early twenties and they’re great, despite their different upbringings. And workplaces should adapt to them and their culture, not the other way round. Our workplace has. For example we got rid of businesswear, because we listened to them and their concerns that it’s old fashioned and stupid and now everybody wears jeans or joggers and we are much comfier.

Superhansrantowindsor · Yesterday 10:55

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 10:41

Common sense
But your answer likes common sense! Or are you inferring that what is common sense to YOU is the right answer?

I think children under the age of 6 should be in bed no later than 6pm. You think they are fine going to bed at 8pm.

Which one is common sense?

I haven’t got a six year old so have no opinion on that. Different children have different needs I suppose. I can’t remember what time mine went to bed at that age. That is a parenting issue. I have no control over rules in people’s own homes. I am responsible for pupils in my classroom and stipulating that a blazer has to be worn on entering and exiting a room but can be removed immediately is stupid. Common sense tells you that it doesn’t matter. You aren’t comparing like with like. No doubt you’ll come back with a reason why wearing a blazer upon entering and exiting a room regardless of the temperature is a sensible rule. I won’t be convinced.

DoNotComply · Yesterday 10:58

DeftGoldHedgehog · Yesterday 07:50

Nonsense. These tight rules to keep them on the straight and narrow made my well-behaved DD2, who got high praise from teachers all through primary school for effort and attitude, feel like she'd done something wrong when she hadn't, and made her develop severe anxiety. Because she has been brought up with boundaries and consistency, but also a strong sense of fairness.

Edited

This. My DD was the same, and lazy teachers who used whole class punishments instead of dealing with the kids who were actually causing problems ruined her school experience.

Her primary head teacher massively pushed the authoritarian "teachers are always right, never question what an adult tells you to do" line. It backfired tragically when it turned out one of the adults was leveraging that attitude to abuse kids.

OP's stance assumes that all school staff are good at their jobs, honest and fair - this is far from being the case in my experience.

Comtesse · Yesterday 11:01

Teenytinypineapple · Yesterday 08:19

But it is absolutely true. To think otherwise is to miss some of the very basic approaches to parenting.

I have a 4 year old. He has never really been naughty. He's had the small stuff instilled in him with reasoning from the start, along with the lesson that, sometimes, we just have to do things we don't like. If we feel strongly about something, we can raise it. We don't break the rules first, we talk about it calmly and in a rational way. We've now had plenty of conversations whereby he has explained why he thinks something should be done differently and, where that causes no issue, we've then allowed the rule (or its application) to be changed.

That's how you do it.

He's one of only two children in his school class to have been recognised for following all the rules, on every occasion, since starting school. His name has also spread around like wildfire because of his ability to converse, reason and rationalise which (crazily) is beyond that of children many, many years older than him.

He'll change the world for the better because he'll understand how to do it.

A 4 year old who is going to change the world because he follows all the rules? Right you are 🤣 see what he’s like in 10 years before making these kind of wild prognostications….

AmethystDeceiver · Yesterday 11:09

Comtesse · Yesterday 11:01

A 4 year old who is going to change the world because he follows all the rules? Right you are 🤣 see what he’s like in 10 years before making these kind of wild prognostications….

I did think the same! No one knows it all like the mother of one young child....

Enjoy the compliance while it lasts @Teenytinypineapple !!

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 11:23

Sorry to derail but how on earth do you get a 5 year old to bed for 6pm?! What time are you getting them up in the morning?
Haha, they're now in their 20s. They used to look at books in bed, start reading. Up at 6am.

Yes blame the kids rather than late stage capitalism. You should go and read about Japan and what’s happening there. Gig economies, no security, lack of prospects. No wonder ours are giving up and opting out
Ha yes, when running out of arguments, blame capitalism! Or the government. Predictable!

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 11:41

Passaggressfedup · Yesterday 11:23

Sorry to derail but how on earth do you get a 5 year old to bed for 6pm?! What time are you getting them up in the morning?
Haha, they're now in their 20s. They used to look at books in bed, start reading. Up at 6am.

Yes blame the kids rather than late stage capitalism. You should go and read about Japan and what’s happening there. Gig economies, no security, lack of prospects. No wonder ours are giving up and opting out
Ha yes, when running out of arguments, blame capitalism! Or the government. Predictable!

Don’t you think society has any impact on young people’s outcomes?