Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be disappointed Dolly Parton supported biological men using women's toilets?

729 replies

Jane3212 · 21/09/2026 00:44

I really liked her music and she seemed like a nice person: her Imagination Library came to my borough recently. I was very sad to hear she'd died.
But was very disappointed to read this. The statements she made about trans people deserving respect, no issue with those.
But minimising the reasonable concerns women have about being forced to let men in their toilets was wrong.
I'm not saying she should have spoken out for GC issues. It might have been best just not to comment.
Parton had connections with drag queens and I wonder if that's the lens she saw transwomen through : not an excuse but might partially explain.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:11

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:07

So don’t. Stop blowing hot air and let those who want to discuss single sex spaces if they want. It’s relevant to the discussion. All you’ve done is demand a poster answer to you.

Well to keep it relevant why don't you follow the line of discussion for me. You said :
Good because it’s not a derail. The OP highlighted Dolly’s comments that correlate to single sex spaces and women’s rights to them. It’s very relevant. Discussion naturally evolves

What's the American rights your referring to here and how are they relevant to Dolly's personal thoughts and opinions.

If a discussion is gonna evolve, you can't just skip the original point to jump to what you want to discuss instead.

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:13

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:10

So by your own definition you were derailing then. On this thread.

You don’t appear to know what ‘GC feminism’ is.

If you read properly, I was clearly I was responding to a misogynistic accusation made at me by a PP where what I said was directly relevant counter point to their post, that's not a derail. It's embarrassing that those who keep bringing up reading comprehension can't follow a simple quoted discussion.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:14

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:11

Well to keep it relevant why don't you follow the line of discussion for me. You said :
Good because it’s not a derail. The OP highlighted Dolly’s comments that correlate to single sex spaces and women’s rights to them. It’s very relevant. Discussion naturally evolves

What's the American rights your referring to here and how are they relevant to Dolly's personal thoughts and opinions.

If a discussion is gonna evolve, you can't just skip the original point to jump to what you want to discuss instead.

That isn’t what happened though. Why would I talk about American legislation. The OP was talking generally. This is getting boring.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:15

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:13

If you read properly, I was clearly I was responding to a misogynistic accusation made at me by a PP where what I said was directly relevant counter point to their post, that's not a derail. It's embarrassing that those who keep bringing up reading comprehension can't follow a simple quoted discussion.

So not derailing when it’s you, but everyone else it’s derailing. Ok.

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:16

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:14

That isn’t what happened though. Why would I talk about American legislation. The OP was talking generally. This is getting boring.

Sigh

Can you answer did you RTFT? Because that wasn't OPs point, it was the point of the person I was originally responding to who said they weren't being transphobic in thinking Dolly was wrong because she was saying something counter to the supreme court ruling, which obviously made no sense. If you wanna talk about rights explain which right to SSS means Dolly cannot say or think what she said.

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:19

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:15

So not derailing when it’s you, but everyone else it’s derailing. Ok.

No...it's derailing when its not connected to the pair you're responding to.
Me - calls out misinformation that trans women are murderers
PP- you're one of those male centred feminists
Me - explains how one side of the GC debate is more male centred especially on line

That's not a derail. A derail would have been changing the subject to something else about the trans issue "well what about X".

You could Google this or since you accused me of using AI, why don't you ask AI?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:21

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:19

No...it's derailing when its not connected to the pair you're responding to.
Me - calls out misinformation that trans women are murderers
PP- you're one of those male centred feminists
Me - explains how one side of the GC debate is more male centred especially on line

That's not a derail. A derail would have been changing the subject to something else about the trans issue "well what about X".

You could Google this or since you accused me of using AI, why don't you ask AI?

Who stated all trans women were murderers?

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:23

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:21

Who stated all trans women were murderers?

If you RTFT you'd know that 🙂

ETA my post didn't say all either! 😉

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:24

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:23

If you RTFT you'd know that 🙂

ETA my post didn't say all either! 😉

Edited

I have, and I didn’t see it 🫤

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:24

Some have been convicted of murder, that’s just a fact.

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:29

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 16:24

I have, and I didn’t see it 🫤

Reading and skimming aren't the same. Are you a guy by chance? I'm just curious because it's unlike a woman to so confidentially say they didn't see something that was right there for them if they wanted to look / search etc.

WouldYouLikeAnyToast · Yesterday 16:39

Soupsavior · Yesterday 14:28

Aren't you embarrassed to be so evidently not able to follow even your own line of thought or point you're making ? You really don't see the irony in suggesting it's people with a different opinion to you that are school age.

Outside of the safe space of FWR, innit. Can't compute more than one dissenting voice. Must be a Reddit invasion!! School's out! 🙄😁

over50andfab · Yesterday 17:20

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 15:32

I’m not disappointed in Dolly. I’m her biggest fan. Regardless of her thoughts on toilets.

I think the earlier suggestion of a herbal tea was a good one as your posts aren’t making much sense, sorry.

Could you share where Dolly mentioned her thoughts on toilets - other than saying when she's got to pee she's got to pee. What about that do you have an issue with?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 17:30

over50andfab · Yesterday 17:20

Could you share where Dolly mentioned her thoughts on toilets - other than saying when she's got to pee she's got to pee. What about that do you have an issue with?

She was asked about the ‘bathroom bill’. The word toilet is literally in the thread title, and in the OP. Where do people pee? I have no issue with what she said.

Does that cover it all for you?

over50andfab · Yesterday 17:45

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 17:30

She was asked about the ‘bathroom bill’. The word toilet is literally in the thread title, and in the OP. Where do people pee? I have no issue with what she said.

Does that cover it all for you?

Not really. What bit specifically that she said do you have an issue with - maybe quote it?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 17:46

over50andfab · Yesterday 17:45

Not really. What bit specifically that she said do you have an issue with - maybe quote it?

To repeat, I don’t have an issue with what she said. I can’t quote what I don’t have an issue with.

Rollingpinofdoom · Yesterday 18:13

Soupsavior · Yesterday 16:19

No...it's derailing when its not connected to the pair you're responding to.
Me - calls out misinformation that trans women are murderers
PP- you're one of those male centred feminists
Me - explains how one side of the GC debate is more male centred especially on line

That's not a derail. A derail would have been changing the subject to something else about the trans issue "well what about X".

You could Google this or since you accused me of using AI, why don't you ask AI?

Yes. The gender ideologues are definitely more male centred. How often do you hear TWAW compared to TMAM? The SC ruling protected the rights of TIF to maternity, pregnancy, abortion care and allowed them to access female RCC. So why then is the judgement considered bad for trans rights? A TIF was raped within hours of being put in a male psych ward because the hospital followed gender ideology.

the GI cohort seem very centred on TIM accessing female spaces. Where is the campaign to get TIF in male prisons and sports?

over50andfab · Yesterday 20:43

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 17:46

To repeat, I don’t have an issue with what she said. I can’t quote what I don’t have an issue with.

Great, so no point to this whole thread then as Dolly never mentioned what the OP stated in her post.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 20:45

over50andfab · Yesterday 20:43

Great, so no point to this whole thread then as Dolly never mentioned what the OP stated in her post.

You’re here though? Have you read it? The amount of posters who don’t know how threads work is quite astounding.

over50andfab · Yesterday 20:49

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 20:45

You’re here though? Have you read it? The amount of posters who don’t know how threads work is quite astounding.

I am, and have followed the whole thread from the start. I’ve asked the OP a couple of times where Dolly has said what she wrote, as have others. I haven’t seen anywhere that she responded. So this would infer she made it up. I wonder why.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 20:56

over50andfab · Yesterday 20:49

I am, and have followed the whole thread from the start. I’ve asked the OP a couple of times where Dolly has said what she wrote, as have others. I haven’t seen anywhere that she responded. So this would infer she made it up. I wonder why.

So what’s that got to do with me? The OP provided links. Take it up with her.

TheOriginalEmu · Yesterday 21:41

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 12:30

Did she actually say she believed that trans women were women? I don’t think she did. She made a general comment on peeing to keep everyone happy in true Dolly fashion.

she paid for gender affirming care for an employee of hers, she wrote the music for a film about a transwoman, she opposed the bill regarding trans people and toilets. Thats supporting trans people. People who don’t think transwomen are women rarely spend that much time supporting them.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Yesterday 21:43

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 15:02

The irony of those who can’t answer a basic fucking question on why women can’t have their own spaces and sports harping on about misogyny.

It’s why DARVO is so effective. It’s not really irony. It’s a deliberate choice for TRAs and the TRA adjacent.

over50andfab · Yesterday 21:54

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Yesterday 20:56

So what’s that got to do with me? The OP provided links. Take it up with her.

Because you said you were Dolly‘s biggest fan, regardless of her views on toilets. I was asking you what you meant about the second bit given that Dolly didn’t express anything specific other than if you gotta pee you gotta pee.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Yesterday 22:02

sunshine314 · 21/09/2026 11:01

Thinking men are women is literally wrong.

She was wrong, and a lovely person at the same time. Which reminds us that even if we don't share the same opinion, we can still be friends.

Well said. It’s possible to be wrong about stuff, and mean well. Everyone in the world who thinks men can be women is wrong, from my perspective. I’m agnostic so I’m not going to rule gendered souls out entirely, like I’m not ruling out god or a flying teapot. Some of them are objectively good people, some are not. It is misguided because women and girls matter.

But people should be able to disagree and still be friends, as you say.