Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Burnham’s words may haunt his premiership?

546 replies

Greyrock79 · Today 07:16

To think that Burnham’s words are going to haunt his premiership?

‘…national security can’t come at the expense of social security…’

OP posts:
RedToothBrush · Today 12:42

dustabsorber · Today 12:26

War is not a totally bad thing. World War one got women the vote, World War 2 ushered in the welfare state. A World War 3 will bring an end to capitalism. Plus all the inventions that people take for granted. Radio, television, computers all by products of war.

Sometimes people write such utter drivel.

War is a bad thing if you and/or your family/friends end up dead.

I don't think a lot of people will be bothered enough by the end of the Capitalism to sacrifice their children for it.

I doubt my great grandfather who fought in WW1 was cheering on the fact that his daughters would get the vote when his 18 year old mates were getting shot around him. Nor do I think my grandfather was really thinking 'great free healthcare' when his neighbours were getting bombed out and was getting shot at by German aircraft over Hamburg.

Posts like this are so utterly removed from the reality and experience of war. They show up the utter privilege and the lack of awareness of the poster making them.

Live through a war, THEN come back to me spouting ideological crap like this and I might take it seriously.

swimsong · Today 12:43

Seems all the ghouls on all the Andy-Burnham-is-a-wrong'un threads are already haunting him. Bet none of them saw the Liz Truss horror show coming.

SevenYellowHammers · Today 12:46

Greyrock79 · Today 12:38

Better that than the comments you have made.

Only if you accidentally on purpose fail to understand metaphor as a rhetorical device. She’s dead. Calling her what she was can’t hurt her. She’d probably like it.

EasternStandard · Today 12:46

RedToothBrush · Today 12:42

Sometimes people write such utter drivel.

War is a bad thing if you and/or your family/friends end up dead.

I don't think a lot of people will be bothered enough by the end of the Capitalism to sacrifice their children for it.

I doubt my great grandfather who fought in WW1 was cheering on the fact that his daughters would get the vote when his 18 year old mates were getting shot around him. Nor do I think my grandfather was really thinking 'great free healthcare' when his neighbours were getting bombed out and was getting shot at by German aircraft over Hamburg.

Posts like this are so utterly removed from the reality and experience of war. They show up the utter privilege and the lack of awareness of the poster making them.

Live through a war, THEN come back to me spouting ideological crap like this and I might take it seriously.

Yes agree.

Greyrock79 · Today 12:47

swimsong · Today 12:43

Seems all the ghouls on all the Andy-Burnham-is-a-wrong'un threads are already haunting him. Bet none of them saw the Liz Truss horror show coming.

Interesting you call Burnham a ‘wrong un’.

I have no view on that, but I do think he’s another hostage to the back benches and their welfare constituents, as well as being a lightweight, a cypher, and a caretaker.

OP posts:
SevenYellowHammers · Today 12:49

nomas · Today 12:17

Of course you are, you didn't get what you wanted.

😂

5128gap · Today 12:50

The generous interpretation of the Thatcher quote is that she was wearing her benevolent Tory hat for Woman's Own, and saying we should help ourselves AND each other as individuals because its the right thing, and we don't need 'society' to impose this or rely on.
Unfortunately this is largely pie in the sky because people are often inclined to want to 'help themselves' to whatever they can get their hands on and sod other people. As the braying to make people poorer so we pay less tax illustrates.
So arguably the helping others thing does actually need enforcing by the state so no one gets the chance to refuse.
Its also more economical, efficient and consistent for 'help' to be provided collectively and coordinated by the state that the rather haphazard scatter gun approach of people helping when they feel like it.

Greyrock79 · Today 12:52

10-year gilt yields currently 5.29% and climbing.

The highest since Aug 2007.

Buckle up.

OP posts:
Heathertrott2 · Today 12:53

LuckyHazelFox · Today 12:14

Just as well nobody's done that then, isn't it?

Look I know you spend every waking minute of the every day on the anti immigration / pro-Israel threads so it may be hard to keep track of what you have said or what you have implied, I get it, but that's exactly what you've done.

Endorsing and agreeing with the OP that the government have taken the sanctions route on Israel to win the Muslim vote rather than because the Israeli government are enabling and facilitating settlers to use extreme violence to force people out of their homes for years and it's about time somebody shone a light on it

SevenYellowHammers · Today 12:53

RedToothBrush · Today 12:42

Sometimes people write such utter drivel.

War is a bad thing if you and/or your family/friends end up dead.

I don't think a lot of people will be bothered enough by the end of the Capitalism to sacrifice their children for it.

I doubt my great grandfather who fought in WW1 was cheering on the fact that his daughters would get the vote when his 18 year old mates were getting shot around him. Nor do I think my grandfather was really thinking 'great free healthcare' when his neighbours were getting bombed out and was getting shot at by German aircraft over Hamburg.

Posts like this are so utterly removed from the reality and experience of war. They show up the utter privilege and the lack of awareness of the poster making them.

Live through a war, THEN come back to me spouting ideological crap like this and I might take it seriously.

@dustabsorber I wish Harry Hill was on here because you would win “Stupid Comment Of The Week “

LoyalMintOtter · Today 12:53

Greyrock79 · Today 12:47

Interesting you call Burnham a ‘wrong un’.

I have no view on that, but I do think he’s another hostage to the back benches and their welfare constituents, as well as being a lightweight, a cypher, and a caretaker.

A really good example of posting nothing of real value. Swooping in to give more focus to the idea that Burnham is as you picked up (deliberately out of context) a 'wrong un' without offering other thoughts or solutions. That is why the endless daily threads are so tedious.

Greyrock79 · Today 12:54

Heathertrott2 · Today 12:53

Look I know you spend every waking minute of the every day on the anti immigration / pro-Israel threads so it may be hard to keep track of what you have said or what you have implied, I get it, but that's exactly what you've done.

Endorsing and agreeing with the OP that the government have taken the sanctions route on Israel to win the Muslim vote rather than because the Israeli government are enabling and facilitating settlers to use extreme violence to force people out of their homes for years and it's about time somebody shone a light on it

Which begs the question, surely.

Why now?

OP posts:
EasternStandard · Today 12:54

LoyalMintOtter · Today 12:53

A really good example of posting nothing of real value. Swooping in to give more focus to the idea that Burnham is as you picked up (deliberately out of context) a 'wrong un' without offering other thoughts or solutions. That is why the endless daily threads are so tedious.

You don’t have to read them though. There’s plenty of other threads on here.

LuckyHazelFox · Today 12:56

Heathertrott2 · Today 12:53

Look I know you spend every waking minute of the every day on the anti immigration / pro-Israel threads so it may be hard to keep track of what you have said or what you have implied, I get it, but that's exactly what you've done.

Endorsing and agreeing with the OP that the government have taken the sanctions route on Israel to win the Muslim vote rather than because the Israeli government are enabling and facilitating settlers to use extreme violence to force people out of their homes for years and it's about time somebody shone a light on it

Oh God, another one obsessed with my posts. As soon as I see this now, I don't engage any further.

Greyrock79 · Today 12:57

LoyalMintOtter · Today 12:53

A really good example of posting nothing of real value. Swooping in to give more focus to the idea that Burnham is as you picked up (deliberately out of context) a 'wrong un' without offering other thoughts or solutions. That is why the endless daily threads are so tedious.

Start your own thread perhaps?

Just an idea.

OP posts:
BrandiedAromatics · Today 13:05

Greyrock79 · Today 12:54

Which begs the question, surely.

Why now?

I understand that it is because of the planned expansion of the housing development for settlers. They are going ahead with another 1.200 homes for settlers in the Occupied Territory. They are have also been firing at school children - according to their teacher.

Heathertrott2 · Today 13:05

Greyrock79 · Today 12:54

Which begs the question, surely.

Why now?

Maybe because he's just signed off expansion plans last month on an area they themselves have said will erase the possibility of a Palestinian state, and enough's enough??
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly50gn1e54o

Wide view of a highway near the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim in the area of the so-called E1 project in Jerusalem, in the occupied West Bank, taken in February 2026.

Israel opens up bids for highly sensitive West Bank settlement project

The UK's foreign secretary condemned the move as "an unacceptable and destructive act".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly50gn1e54o

ShitHoleDweller · Today 13:06

swimsong · Today 12:43

Seems all the ghouls on all the Andy-Burnham-is-a-wrong'un threads are already haunting him. Bet none of them saw the Liz Truss horror show coming.

Your interpretation of, ‘ghoul’ please?

justasking111 · Today 13:06

NorthXNorthWest · Today 09:36

His actual parliamentary voter base was Makerfield not Muslims. They are the only people who had the opportunity to vote for him. He received 24,927 votes and then stood unopposed to become the next leader of the Labour Party. That's equivalent to around 0.05% of the UK electorate having actually voted for our current leader.

And sure, we don't directly elect the Prime Minister or party leaders in the UK. We vote for our local MP. But who leads a party clearly influences whether people vote for that party at a general election, so you can't completely separate the two.

So let's not pretend it's Muslims when his actual electoral mandate comes from one tiny northern town.

I wouldn't call Manchester a tiny northern town.

TemperanceWest · Today 13:08

Greyrock79 · Today 12:52

10-year gilt yields currently 5.29% and climbing.

The highest since Aug 2007.

Buckle up.

.

i knew it matthew perry GIF
ShitHoleDweller · Today 13:08

Greyrock79 · Today 12:52

10-year gilt yields currently 5.29% and climbing.

The highest since Aug 2007.

Buckle up.

I know nothing about Gilt yields. Explain it to me please.

TemperanceWest · Today 13:10

Greyrock79 · Today 12:01

There are numerous posters who only post on politics - even when you sign up to MN, you can elect to choose the topics that interest you.

I feel you may have vast experience in this...🤭

ShitHoleDweller · Today 13:10

Heathertrott2 · Today 13:05

Maybe because he's just signed off expansion plans last month on an area they themselves have said will erase the possibility of a Palestinian state, and enough's enough??
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly50gn1e54o

It sounds like they’re at war.

CoffeeCantata · Today 13:10

Pluto46 · Today 09:08

You mean like the left constantly quoting, even to this day, Margaret Thatcher's no such thing as society sound-bite totally out of context ?

That really winds me up too, and I’m no Thatcherite - but I don’t like devious twisting of the truth.

She said there’s no such thing as society (ie some abstract notion) - it’s made up of all is as individuals playing our part.

i agree. She was simply pointing out all our responsibilities as citizens and discouraging the reliance on some sort of abstract idea which gets us all off the hook.

Greyrock79 · Today 13:11

TemperanceWest · Today 13:10

I feel you may have vast experience in this...🤭

Genuine question - I am serious.

Do you get out much? As in, leave your home?

OP posts: