Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Rise of far right

802 replies

Sillyme1 · Today 07:00

Any one else worried about the rise of the far right in Europe. Churchill once said ‘those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it’. Obviously social conditions are different from the 1930s, but there are similarities such as using immigrants as scapegoats (not Jews this time). Things can so easily escalate and I admit to being worried

OP posts:
Stairlifter · Today 10:52

BirdsSinginInTheSycamoreTrees · Today 10:48

That's the problem though, serious conversations can't be had especially from those who's communities are most affected by large numbers of unknown men being placed there, without them being labelled racist or far right. Not allowing people to voice worries but shouting them down as racists and far right is exactly why they'll vote for Reform.

If Reform end up in power here it won't just be the 'racist/uneducated/thugs/insult-of-choice' voting for them to blame.

It is rare that I have seen anyone denounced as far right or racist who wasn't one or both of those things.

There are ways to voice reasonable concerns. Calmly and with factual backup. Very often people voice things in a way which is racist, and then object to being called out on it.

Livelovebehappy · Today 10:52

Stairlifter · Today 10:44

Democracy doesn't mean that. Not our parliamentary democracy at any rate. Since WWII, the following Prime Ministers of the UK have taken office between General Elections:

Eden
Douglas-Home
Callaghan
Major
Brown
May
Johnson
Truss
Sunak

That's more than came to power after an election
Attlee
Churchill
Wilson
Heath
Thatcher
Blair
Cameron
Starmer

But, you know, don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

Did I say it was just Burnham? The whole system is wrong. If someone gets sacked or relinquishes power during their term in office, then a GE should be triggered. This would then eliminate parties continuously getting rid of their leader, and eliminate the ridiculous fact that we have had seven different PMs in 10 years.

LuckyHazelFox · Today 10:53

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 10:50

Yes. It's that obvious.

It's also obvious that you wish for the forum to remain predominantly left wing. All in the name of looking after women's rights, of course. A shame Green voters don't feel the same about those rights.

Jollygreygiantess · Today 10:53

LuckyHazelFox · Today 10:48

She won't name those suspects though.

I'm not surprised. The Police have been busy knocking on peoples' door because they put "hurty words" on Social Media -
https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/select-communications-offences-and-concerns-over-free-speech/

I'm still looking for the latest stats but for the moment - https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/uk-online-communications-arrests-charged-convicted-imprisoned-stats-b0f70c

aberamagold · Today 10:53

stuckdownahole · Today 09:28

I believe that if our government makes it clear that the role of an economic migrant is to help the State, rather than the role of the State being to help any economic migrant who happens to come along, then the disquiet will be quelled.

This.

We cannot take on an unlimited obligation to take care of anyone, anywhere, who wants to come here.

Most low paid economic migrants should only be allowed in on short term visas. There should be no assumption that they can stay here forever and bring multiple family members here, and no entitlement to benefits. If their circumstances change so they can't work, they go home.

We should help asylum seekers primarily by supporting them in countries near their home. A limited number, who should have a demonstrable commitment to the values of the UK, including respecting women as human beings equal to men, should be offered asylum and given generous support to integrate into our society. People who enter irregularly should be immediately deported, and no asylum claims considered.

I realise this may be in conflict with the current interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. That is because the legal interpretation has evolved far from what was originally intended, and is now in conflict with the human rights of European citizens. Ideally all the European countries should agree that the interpretation be changed, but if not we need to leave.

Slightyamusedandsilly · Today 10:54

Mirsine · Today 10:50

100%! It’s terrifying and equally depressing.

I have a family member who is mixed race half English and half Pakistani. He was born here. Has a very good job in education, paid tax all his working life and was told to “fuck off back to where you came from you P#KI cunt you’re not welcome here” as he walked past 2 “concerned fathers” draped in England flags, cans in hand, at a “protest” in our town centre.

EXACTLY!!!

No conception that the vast majority of society deems their unemployed, scrounging carcasses as unwanted, rather than the productive member of society who just happens to be brown skinned.

EasternStandard · Today 10:54

LuckyHazelFox · Today 10:49

Yet you seem to have gained enough of an insight to make pointed remarks.

Par for the course.

Stairlifter · Today 10:55

Blondiebeachbabe · Today 10:49

Even if it was 900 a week, that's 47000 a year, which is the population of Brentwood. No one in their right mind could think that's sustainable. Add to that the fact that these are all men from different cultures, and you have a massive problem.

Since 2018 (when we started recording boat arrivals), 209,000 people (mainly men) have arrived illegally on small boats.

To give context, the following places in England each have a population of around 209,000 :

Slough

Milton Keynes

Rochdale

High Wycombe

Who the fuck thinks this is a good idea for Britain?

And will people stop pretending that we can integrate with these men? They are not engineers and doctors who respect women. Wake up.

Very few people think it's a good idea. I certainly don't. However, if we are going to have a discussion, let's base it on facts. Numbers were thrown out which were exaggerations by a factor of 10. So let's get down to the real numbers first, then we can discuss it.

You have provided the real numbers, and I agree with you that they are too high. I'm absolutely certain that most MPs and the government agree with us. But actually finding a solution is really hard. The government has reduced numbers this year by 40%, which is great, and it continues to try. But what will definitely not help is black clad masked men in the streets, nationalist bellicose rhetoric and an abandonment of international obligations and our compassion as a nation.

echt · Today 10:55

Newbutoldfather · Today 10:49

@echt ,

‘What is this native population of which you speak, **?
What is its composition?’

This is always used as a gotcha argument by the left to prove anyone suspicious of mass low skill immigration is thick. However, just because something is hard to define, and there are many grey areas, doesn’t mean it is a concept without validity.

I would describe myself as a part of the native population despite being second generation secular Jewish (although a part of my family goes back a lot further but emigrated and reimmigrated over a couple of generations). Why? Because I don’t have another country or culture (to a greater extent), I understand English at a deep level and I get all the British reference points (landmarks, books, expressions, theatre etc etc). And my primary loyalty is to the UK.

New immigrants who don’t speak English, don’t get cultural references and neither are nor want to absorb our values can become a problem. That’s not to say that they can’t be absorbed in sensible numbers over a period of time. But it’s not instantaneous and doesn’t work if we defend ghettoisation or pretend that all cultures are equal.

It is this that was taboo to discuss and which the far right exploit.

That's what you think about you, but it's not the definition of a native population.

It smacks of Norman Tebbit's Cricket Test, and not I believe, what @Lemonraider meant either, though they were unable to engage with evidence and agreements.

Worrall20 · Today 10:56

Zonder · Today 07:40

Exactly. But some people listen to Farage and believe him.

Just like some listen to Burnham and believe him.

Slightyamusedandsilly · Today 10:56

LuckyHazelFox · Today 10:53

It's also obvious that you wish for the forum to remain predominantly left wing. All in the name of looking after women's rights, of course. A shame Green voters don't feel the same about those rights.

Or maybe just keen for the majority of MN members to be humans rather than AI?

Jollygreygiantess · Today 10:56

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 10:45

This thread shows that Mumsnet is leaning hard to the right. Worrying, if it's representative of real women's views rather than just the usual suspects who are always all over threads like this.

I disagree.
I have always thought that if MN got any further left it would meet itself coming back.

EasternStandard · Today 10:57

Slightyamusedandsilly · Today 10:56

Or maybe just keen for the majority of MN members to be humans rather than AI?

Who is AI on the thread?

5MinuteArgument · Today 10:58

Newbutoldfather · Today 10:49

@echt ,

‘What is this native population of which you speak, **?
What is its composition?’

This is always used as a gotcha argument by the left to prove anyone suspicious of mass low skill immigration is thick. However, just because something is hard to define, and there are many grey areas, doesn’t mean it is a concept without validity.

I would describe myself as a part of the native population despite being second generation secular Jewish (although a part of my family goes back a lot further but emigrated and reimmigrated over a couple of generations). Why? Because I don’t have another country or culture (to a greater extent), I understand English at a deep level and I get all the British reference points (landmarks, books, expressions, theatre etc etc). And my primary loyalty is to the UK.

New immigrants who don’t speak English, don’t get cultural references and neither are nor want to absorb our values can become a problem. That’s not to say that they can’t be absorbed in sensible numbers over a period of time. But it’s not instantaneous and doesn’t work if we defend ghettoisation or pretend that all cultures are equal.

It is this that was taboo to discuss and which the far right exploit.

Yes and most of the new immigrants gravitate towards the poorer neighbourhoods. So we get the toxic situation of poorer people shouldering the burden, grumbling about it and either being ignored or called racists, bigots etc by better off people who are completely unaffected by it and who can talk glibly about 'enrichment.'

It's so toxic and this is what mainstream parties are expecting us to accept as normal.

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 10:58

LuckyHazelFox · Today 10:53

It's also obvious that you wish for the forum to remain predominantly left wing. All in the name of looking after women's rights, of course. A shame Green voters don't feel the same about those rights.

Yeah whatever. You trying to pick a fight with me isn't helping your cause. I'm not interested anyway. Goodbye!

Lemonraider · Today 10:58

echt · Today 10:40

Treating a native population like this is inhumane.

What is this native population of which you speak, @Lemonraider?
What is its composition?

There's no native population in Britain. Anyone from anywhere in the world is British, there's millions of unborn people in every country in the world that are British, British just means person from anywhere. The other 199 countries all have their own people but not Britain, it has always been populated by the entire planet and there are no native people at all, it's always been a Pakistani, Indian, Romanian, African and Arab country. The words Pakistani, Indian, Middle Eastern and African simply mean British and always have done for millennia, since time began. Native people have never lived here, it's always been the case that the majority of babies born here were from other countries, in fact the United Kingdom isn't actually a country at all, it's simply a suburb of Pakistan India Africa and the middle east. The word country doesn't apply to Britain, only the rest of the world's countries.

Stairlifter · Today 10:58

Livelovebehappy · Today 10:52

Did I say it was just Burnham? The whole system is wrong. If someone gets sacked or relinquishes power during their term in office, then a GE should be triggered. This would then eliminate parties continuously getting rid of their leader, and eliminate the ridiculous fact that we have had seven different PMs in 10 years.

OK that's a view, but it would mean a fundamental change in the way our democracy has always functioned, and doesn't say much for your view of Parliament.

I wonder if you're one of the people who profess to be a patriot and to love their country. You don't seem keen on its central democratic tenet though.

FrootyCider · Today 10:58

I live and work in area of a major city which would cause Tommy-Ten-Names-Who-Is-Actually-An-Illegal-Immigrant-Himself to develop a Hernia. My colleagues come from all over the world. The service users come from all over the world, and came over in all sorts of different ways. Why aren't I scared? Why don't I live in fear? If they were right, I ought to be running from machete wielding rapists every day. Instead we have a thriving high street, beautiful parks, lots of great options for food, and yes, there are still plenty of British people.

It's in stark contrast to the town centre in my home town which is overwhelmingly white, completely dead and full of (white) crackheads.

Funnily enough, Reform and Restore have a stranglehold on my hometown. It tends to be areas which do not have a major migrant population which these parties target - it's easier to get people riled up about people they don't know. Easier to create a boogeyman out of strangers.

Generational poverty and lack of opportunity are a major issue in small towns and cities across the UK. Industry has left, people don't go to the shops as much any more, and 'the others' are always the scapegoat. Take the migrants out of Clacton for example, and their issues wouldn't change, because it's about 2% of the population.

I'd rather have 100 of my migrants neighbours (and friends) than one of Frog Face's ilk living next to me. I do hope that communities that need support and investment feel heard and get what they need, whatever their make up.

Livpool · Today 10:59

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · Today 07:34

People in Nazi Germany believed that they had legitimate grievances. The Jews and other groups were demonised because people were struggling and they were looking for someone to blame. And when there is deep antisemitism and other forms of prejudice, it's very easy for people to be persuaded that particular groups are the cause of all their problems.

It was obviously wrong then, and it is obviously wrong now. But people are easily manipulated and they don't learn.

Yep!

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 11:00

Jollygreygiantess · Today 10:56

I disagree.
I have always thought that if MN got any further left it would meet itself coming back.

Edited

Nah. And I consider myself very much a centrist.

JHound · Today 11:00

Mangelwurzelfortea · Today 10:45

This thread shows that Mumsnet is leaning hard to the right. Worrying, if it's representative of real women's views rather than just the usual suspects who are always all over threads like this.

I don’t know which way Mumsnet leans generally but I think it just reflects society. There has always been a far right and fairly racist component in MN (as opposed to merely anti-immigrant). But I think that’s just society too.

HelenaWaiting · Today 11:01

HermioneWeasley · Today 07:07

Yes, but the comparison is not the same

there is and never had been any problems caused by Jewish people. I think there is a legitimate conversation to have about immigration, and successive governments’ complete inability to assess those issues or even permit conversation about it has given oxygen to right wing parties.

Britain is a very centrist and tolerant country but also has a strong sense of fairness. The state of the Uk at the moment doesn’t feel fair. 2 years ago the population voted to get rid of the conservatives because they were failing. They didnt actually swing to the left and choose Labour, it was just a rejection of the failing party in power.

the situation is recoverable but will take some tough choices. Labour have shown they’re not prepared to do that - the mildest of welfare reform was utterly rejected by the party.

Britain is a very centrist and tolerant country but also has a strong sense of fairness.

I'm not sure that view would be shared by immigrants, people of ethnic minorities or disabled people.

Lifeomars · Today 11:01

Mooselander · Today 07:19

YABVU. And what is described as the “far right” now was centralist not that long ago.

Could you give some examples please. When and where were there "centralist" governments that would now fit the description of "far right"

Livpool · Today 11:01

Mooselander · Today 07:19

YABVU. And what is described as the “far right” now was centralist not that long ago.

You are talking rubbish.

Stairlifter · Today 11:02

Mirsine · Today 10:50

100%! It’s terrifying and equally depressing.

I have a family member who is mixed race half English and half Pakistani. He was born here. Has a very good job in education, paid tax all his working life and was told to “fuck off back to where you came from you P#KI cunt you’re not welcome here” as he walked past 2 “concerned fathers” draped in England flags, cans in hand, at a “protest” in our town centre.

This is why I don't get the whole Zia Yusuf thing. As if Reform's key demographic wouldn't have him on the first plane to Pakistan if they could. And yet he's their biggest public cheerleader!

Swipe left for the next trending thread