Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to leave ten year old twins in a cafe while I swim?

709 replies

justkeepswimminginalake · Yesterday 20:45

I’m a single parent to ten year old twins and I was hoping to start open water swimming again. There’s a swimming lake near me which has an onsite cafe and I was thinking about leaving the boys in the cafe by themselves while I swim. We’ve been to the cafe a few times and it’s fairly chilled, mostly swimmers (and their friends/families), young families and old people. It’s also next door to the reception area for the swimming lakes so if they feel uncomfortable there’s somewhere else they can go.

Would I be unreasonable to order them breakfast and a drink and leave them there for half an hour while I swim. They’re generally pretty sensible and I’d pack Yotos with headphones, and some games and books for them to entertain themselves. There’s no one else who can take them.

OP posts:
Autumngirl5 · Yesterday 23:41

I would think they will be fine if they had their IPads for half an hour. You know your boys and I’m sure you would not consider it if you didn’t think they would be sensible.

Cornucopia55 · Yesterday 23:42

stichguru · Yesterday 22:26

Would they know what to do as well as an adult if something went wrong? Probably not so don't leave them. We were at a National Trust property over summer. Left our 13.5 year old at the cafe while we went for a walk for maybe 20 mins, fire in top field, property evacuated. He was fine, went out with everyone else in the cafe, but it made me wonder whether he is too young. He walks to school alone and goes to the park with friends alone, but it was still scary. If he'd been 10 it would have been awful.

But, @stichguru nothing bad happened to your son from what you say here. He learned that sometimes places are evacuated and they were presumably told where to go. And you will have had the opportunity to talk about how these situations are dealt with. Now he'll have a better idea of what to do the next time he encounters an unexpected situation while visiting an attraction. If he'd been 10 it would have been just the same, except I expect the staff might have checked where he expected to find his parent. And OP can discuss with her kids what to do if the unexpected happens - eg if for any reason they couldn't stay in the café, they could a) go and ask staff at the lake to call their mum in from the swimming area, or b) wait outside the café, or wherever OP suggests.

BunkBedsArePeopleShelves · Yesterday 23:44

Besidemyselfwithworry · Yesterday 23:34

It wouldn’t be “weird” for the twins it would be devastating
the mother is unhinged to even be considering this

Why would they be any more devastated if they were in a cafe than they would if they were at home, or at at school, or anywhere else?
Their mother being dead would be the problem, not the location they were in at the time!!!

CypressGrove · Yesterday 23:44

Besidemyselfwithworry · Yesterday 23:34

It wouldn’t be “weird” for the twins it would be devastating
the mother is unhinged to even be considering this

The OP is probably more likely to be killed in a car accident on the 20 min drive to the lake than she is to drown swimming in a 100 x 100 metre lake with a lifeguard.

dingodan · Yesterday 23:44

@FreddoBRIDGE where did I actually say she was being unreasonable? I said it’s not something I would do. I reported another poster who was calling her all sorts of things because it wasn’t appropriate.

I have just made the point that you can be against a cafe at 10 but still be fine with dc travelling to school. And I have reiterated that I do not see cafes full of preteens. I don’t think either point is particularly controversial, we don’t all have to agree on everything! Surely you were taught this at school yourself 😆

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · Yesterday 23:48

I've always thought my parents were a little on the over protective side!

It's absolutely fine for two 10 year olds to sit in a café and have something to eat on their own.

It's not an unhinged idea. And for those worried about all the million things that could happen I don't know how you manage to ever leave the house if you think like that.

bendmeoverbackwards · Yesterday 23:49

dingodan · Yesterday 21:47

This is not standard for all 10 year olds though. Plenty of secondary dc are driven by parents

That’s not a good thing. Year 7 is the ideal time for children to start going to school independently if they don’t do so already. Not allowing them to do that is doing them a disservice and they aren’t developing independence skills. Hell if my visually impaired students that I teach can navigate a journey to school (that’s my job), most sighted 11 year olds can manage it.

maudelovesharold · Yesterday 23:50

CypressGrove · Yesterday 23:44

The OP is probably more likely to be killed in a car accident on the 20 min drive to the lake than she is to drown swimming in a 100 x 100 metre lake with a lifeguard.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the op has abandoned all ideas of going for a swim now. Never mind the twins, she’ll be lucky to survive all the hazards to her safety!

VioletSeagull · Yesterday 23:50

I think it would be fine. You're not asking anyone in the cafe to look after your children. They're old enough to be on their own for half an hour IMO. One of my favourite memories is walking to a cafe with my cousin when our families were on holiday and having lunch together. We were 9 or 10 years old and we felt so grown up, ordering lunch and eating together, just the two of us.

andthat · Yesterday 23:54

dingodan · Yesterday 23:40

My condolences that it’s a rite of passage to go to Costa, they are crap!

You can prepare for high school without going to Costa…

I think you know the point I’m making. Costa.. whatever… insert independent cafe if you want to.

ragandbonewoman · Yesterday 23:55

Londonrach1 · Yesterday 21:08

I have a very sensible ten year old but no way would I put her at risk like you thinking. No ten is too young. Yabu

This is absolutely ridiculous. How is your very sensible 10 year old going to get themselves to secondary school next year? How are two ten year olds “at risk” in a cafe? At risk of what?

Sorry but if you think you’re protecting your ten year old child by never letting them out of your sight, you’re actually doing quite the opposite because no independence or responsibility makes for a very vulnerable adolescent I’m afraid

Movingonup313 · Today 00:00

I dont see the issue if the 10 year olds are responsible. Kids here go to cafes/milk bars/fast food places at 10 years old without parents. (The sensible and able ones).
If I were doing it id ask that they pee before I went to the water so they arent going go the loo. [Predator dar] amd I doubt you would be more than 40 minutes.

If i were staff my only issue would be if they clowned around and disturbed people - i would be happy to keep a side view on them, esp knowing its giving mum a chance to swim and kids getting a wee bit independence. Go for it OP.

ThatHangryRubyReader · Today 00:02

Honestly if they had Ipads I would. But be realistic could you do it while they are in school or at a time you don't have them during custody? Most Cafe's will get annoyed

PixieTales · Today 00:06

YANBU to pop out for a swim and leave two 10 year olds at home for a small length of time however YABU to dump them at a cafe etc and expect other people to parent your children while you swim.

So which is it. You either trust them responsibly to care for themselves (leave at home) or you don’t but quite happy to pass parenting responsibility onto staff?

FreddoBRIDGE · Today 00:07

dingodan · Yesterday 23:44

@FreddoBRIDGE where did I actually say she was being unreasonable? I said it’s not something I would do. I reported another poster who was calling her all sorts of things because it wasn’t appropriate.

I have just made the point that you can be against a cafe at 10 but still be fine with dc travelling to school. And I have reiterated that I do not see cafes full of preteens. I don’t think either point is particularly controversial, we don’t all have to agree on everything! Surely you were taught this at school yourself 😆

Edited

By dingodan·
Yesterday 21:44
I think that’s crazy particularly as you are around water

lavenderrosedaisy · Today 00:08

I’m really surprised by these responses. If they’re sensible kids and don’t mess around then I think it’s fine. My 10 year old went to McDonald’s with her friends after school last term (just started year 6 now) and didn’t think anything of it!

WhySoManySocks · Today 00:08

Most 10 year olds where we live walk to school and back. So if walking for 15 minutes there and 15 min back is ok but sitting in a cafe for 30 minutes is not, perhaps the OP should shoo them out into the street and make them walk up and down until she is done swimming.

Also, equipping children with a feeling that they can't possibly cope for 30 min without an iPad is significantly more damaging than anything that could happen in a cafe. We're raising generations of screen addicts despite significant literature on how damaging this is to development, attention, and cognition.

Jeezitshard · Today 00:09

justkeepswimminginalake · Yesterday 20:45

I’m a single parent to ten year old twins and I was hoping to start open water swimming again. There’s a swimming lake near me which has an onsite cafe and I was thinking about leaving the boys in the cafe by themselves while I swim. We’ve been to the cafe a few times and it’s fairly chilled, mostly swimmers (and their friends/families), young families and old people. It’s also next door to the reception area for the swimming lakes so if they feel uncomfortable there’s somewhere else they can go.

Would I be unreasonable to order them breakfast and a drink and leave them there for half an hour while I swim. They’re generally pretty sensible and I’d pack Yotos with headphones, and some games and books for them to entertain themselves. There’s no one else who can take them.

At eight years of age I was going to a cafe with my friend and ordering a toasted tea cake and a pot of tea for two. That was in wales. I now live in London. At ten I was allowing my daughter to go to Starbucks and sit and read while I went around Sainsbury’s - with our without a friend. I actually thought some of these posters saying absolutely not were having a joke. It seems not. Looks like parenting has changed in the past few years. My daughter is 18 now - I absolutely trusted her at ten to behave in a cafe, order her own drink if she wanted something extra, go to the cinema with a friend. At what point to you start letting go? I see it now - she has 18 year old friends heading off to uni that still ‘aren’t allowed’ to do things. Or have anxiety about catching a bus by themselves. Wrapping them in cotton wool is never the answer.

FatMrsHoot · Today 00:13

justkeepswimminginalake · Yesterday 20:59

If I did it (which based on this likely won’t) I’d start very short and would be no more than half an hour tops. Then in winter would be even less time as I’m. It at all acclimatised. I’d arrive ready to go in the water and just sling my Dryrobe on afterwards and sort myself at home.

I am also absolutely flabbergasted at the negativity. Of course I would leave them in a café! If I felt like I couldn't give my 10 year old child(ren) an hour of independence, something will have gone terribly wrong somewhere.

Lizzieregina · Today 00:18

You know your kids best. If you feel you can trust them to follow your guidelines, then I think they’ll be fine.

I do childcare and one of the kids just turned 11 and she’s been riding her bike all over for ages. She’s a very sensible girl and sticks to the plan and her parents are very comfortable with the amount of freedom she gets.

Her 8 year old brother now also gets to ride his bike a bit, but more limited.

I’m kind of ancient, but I started taking 2 buses across Manchester when I was 11, including coming home from school when it was dark in the winter.

DearDenimEagle · Today 00:23

justkeepswimminginalake · Yesterday 20:52

Fair enough if that’s the consensus. I used to be dropped off at the local leisure centre at upper primary age to go roller skating with money to get a slush puppy in the cafe afterwards. We’d often bump into people from school doing similar but maybe that was localised to my town, or times have moved on.

Times would appear to have moved on. We went out on our bikes in the days before mobiles and cycled miles at 9 yrs old and 7 yrs old. Even we didn’t know where we were , and parents didn’t give us a thought so long as we were back before street lights came on. We would be left in the library..don’t know where parent went. I had a key to the house on a string round my neck from age 5 . Nobody home when I got in from school.
Helicopter parenting disrespects our children. I wouldn’t leave one child, but 2, if I knew they were going to stay put, I probably would. So long as they knew where I was. At ten I had been taking my brother to dentists and doctors, was doing most of the housework and we went bramble picking and wandering wherever we chose. There are 10 yr olds and 10 yr olds . Only you know yours.

squarecrow · Today 00:45

TheEdgyMoose · Yesterday 22:11

You know your kids, OP. If you think they will be sensible and well behaved then I see nothing wrong with this. The way some people are responding on this post you'd think you were leaving a pair of toddlers.

I have an 11 year old in her final year of primary school, some of her friends are still 10. She and her friends walk or get the bus to school, go to the park, go round a small local shopping centre, go on bike rides... All without adult supervision. I have no idea why people think two 10 year olds need adult supervision to sit and eat breakfast.

Have your swim and enjoy it!

I agree. I think it’s a MN thing. I saw a thread on here once where a woman said her DH would insist on her keeping the back door locked, when she and her son would go in and out and play and she could see the door from where she was sitting the entire time if she was in. The whole thread was people telling her how insane she was for not keeping her door locked without having to be reminded.

FunkyFringe · Today 00:49

I honestly can’t see a problem with this. They’re 10 and there’s two of them. You know your own children, and as long as they’re sensible boys, I don’t think that leaving them with a meal for 30 minutes would do them any harm.

PeachOP · Today 00:57

I think it's absolutely fine! I used to walk home from school aged 10 and wait around for an hour or two for mum to get home, this was early 2000s l. It seems that times have changed!

SquirrelGG · Today 01:17

lenaperkins · Yesterday 20:59

Have people lost their minds? Ten is the last year of primary school. The age when you start to go out shopping or to the cinema on your own isn’t it? Children often do quite complex journeys travelling to secondary schools at 11. As long as they’re not completely wild sitting for an hour in a public place is very low risk.

This. I started secondary school when I was 10, the idea that I couldn't be out of sight of my parents for half an hour would have been laughable. My friends and I were going to milk bars at that age without any form of supervision.