Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question a pool asking my four-year-old daughter to cover up?

321 replies

ChampagneLassie · Yesterday 20:30

I took my two daughters, aged two and four, swimming at Nuffield Health. My four-year-old was wearing swimming bottoms but no top.
A staff member told me she needed to wear something “more appropriate” — apparently a bikini top or one-piece. I asked why, as a four-year-old boy would presumably be allowed to swim topless.
I said I felt this was sexualising a pre-pubescent child. The staff member replied, “I’m a mother. I’m not sexualising children.”
When I asked about the actual policy, she could only say that children had to wear “appropriate clothing”. I’m planning to contact Nuffield for clarification, but I’m interested in other parents’ views.
AIBU to question this? Would you expect a four-year-old girl to have to cover her chest?
I used AI to help make this post more readable.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
TY78910 · Yesterday 21:07

I don’t think she sexualised your DD, it draws attention. You bought a 2 pack bikini bottoms from H&M (designed to mix and match with tops) - I know the kind and they will 100% look like something is missing from the top. For that reason you were told to put a complete set on. It’s unnecessary attention drawing for other swimmers. You might think it’s all innocent and great and super convenient for you, but you don’t know how anyone else feels about that and that’s why the rules are there. What is the cut off point at which they say girls top now must go on? When breast tissue is 0.5cm raised and above? No - the rule must therefore apply to all girls to avoid nonsense arguments.

I took DCs swimming last weekend actually and they had a poster with pictures of what swimwear was permitted.

mtobrokeme · Yesterday 21:07

Plra · Yesterday 20:36

It never occurred to me to take my dd swimming with no top. Why did you do it?

I don’t think they were sexualising your dd.

What do 4 year old girls have that 4 year old boys don’t?

Parcelpass · Yesterday 21:08

YABU. At what age will you tell your DD to wear a costume? Its not appropriate I have never seen this and I used to take DC to swimming lessons each week.

Kingdomofsleep · Yesterday 21:08

Franxi · Yesterday 21:04

I feel like I’ve read this before? But anyway, how would they know she was a girl?

I asked op this one page 1 but she didn't answer because she had other views to air.

My guess it's because the bottoms were a pink frilly type thing.

ToKittyornottoKitty · Yesterday 21:08

FourSevenFive · Yesterday 21:07

Totally normal to have just the swimming bottoms at that age.

One piece is just an absolutely unneccessary wet fabric (especially when going to the toilet and having to put it back on afterwards).

And, technically, the one piece is "sexualising" small girls the same way as bikini top does - it is an extra fabric covering upper torso which boys don't have to bother with, but girls for some mysterious reasons are supposed to.

One piece swimwear for young boys is very widely available, the same t shirt and short shape that is available for girls.

ToKittyornottoKitty · Yesterday 21:09

Kingdomofsleep · Yesterday 21:08

I asked op this one page 1 but she didn't answer because she had other views to air.

My guess it's because the bottoms were a pink frilly type thing.

OP said she was wearing ‘girls bikini bottoms’

Anyahyacinth · Yesterday 21:09

Kingdomofsleep · Yesterday 20:45

Do you know anyone who wears a hijab? Because it is not about sexualisation at all. You're imposing your own value system onto a completely different one.

I'm not Muslim myself but I've had many conversations with women who wear them and it is definitely not because they think their hair is sexy.

Anyway this will derail the thread so I regret bringing it up. You need to open your mind to other points of view rather than accusing female leisure centre staff of being p-dos!

Edit to add - you may not have used the word but accusing someone of "sexualising" a 4yo is the same thing. Some creeps out there actually do sexualise 4yos, and this was not that

Edited

You are arguing about by connecting it to sexualising things. Seriously sexualising children doesnt have anything to do with paedophiles. It’s a debate about mini me clothes etc..

It’s why pre puberty nipples must be hidden on girls not boys at 4. It’s restriction and difference. It’s inequality and sexualisation of girls

Mulledjuice · Yesterday 21:10

Parcelpass · Yesterday 21:08

YABU. At what age will you tell your DD to wear a costume? Its not appropriate I have never seen this and I used to take DC to swimming lessons each week.

maybe when there is something to cover? or when her daughter expresses an opinion?

HesterLeggatt · Yesterday 21:11

Taking all thoughts of gender and sexualising out of this, please do consider that a brightly coloured suit that covers more of her body eg with a swim t shirt or a one piece suit is much safer in terms of visibility should she get into difficulty.

21stNightOfSeptember · Yesterday 21:11

babyproblems · Yesterday 20:44

I think ok on the beach; not in a leisure centre.
I don’t think it’s sexualising your child; it’s normal dress code for swimming.

So should 4yo boys wear a type of swimwear that covers their torso too?

DreamyPinkFox · Yesterday 21:11

ChampagneLassie · Yesterday 20:30

I took my two daughters, aged two and four, swimming at Nuffield Health. My four-year-old was wearing swimming bottoms but no top.
A staff member told me she needed to wear something “more appropriate” — apparently a bikini top or one-piece. I asked why, as a four-year-old boy would presumably be allowed to swim topless.
I said I felt this was sexualising a pre-pubescent child. The staff member replied, “I’m a mother. I’m not sexualising children.”
When I asked about the actual policy, she could only say that children had to wear “appropriate clothing”. I’m planning to contact Nuffield for clarification, but I’m interested in other parents’ views.
AIBU to question this? Would you expect a four-year-old girl to have to cover her chest?
I used AI to help make this post more readable.

Surprising so many adults have never seen a young girl with just swim bottoms on…. Perhaps you have seen them but just didn’t realise they were girls, given that many look exactly like boys at that age? I think it’s really weird to expect a young girl to dress in a way that assumes their non-existent breasts need to be covered! And agree it’s a form of sexualisation: sounds like the lady you said it to didn’t understand the term unfortunately.

loosingjammer · Yesterday 21:12

OriginalSkang · Yesterday 20:37

How did they know her gender?

A young child doesn't have a gender. They have a sex.

Anyahyacinth · Yesterday 21:12

Parcelpass · Yesterday 21:08

YABU. At what age will you tell your DD to wear a costume? Its not appropriate I have never seen this and I used to take DC to swimming lessons each week.

Why isn’t it appropriate? Can you explain?

Catza · Yesterday 21:12

TY78910 · Yesterday 21:07

I don’t think she sexualised your DD, it draws attention. You bought a 2 pack bikini bottoms from H&M (designed to mix and match with tops) - I know the kind and they will 100% look like something is missing from the top. For that reason you were told to put a complete set on. It’s unnecessary attention drawing for other swimmers. You might think it’s all innocent and great and super convenient for you, but you don’t know how anyone else feels about that and that’s why the rules are there. What is the cut off point at which they say girls top now must go on? When breast tissue is 0.5cm raised and above? No - the rule must therefore apply to all girls to avoid nonsense arguments.

I took DCs swimming last weekend actually and they had a poster with pictures of what swimwear was permitted.

I bet you top dollar there isn't a policy which says pre-pubescent kids need to cover up their chest. The "appropriate attire" means don't go swimming in your denim dungarees. Nothing more.
Maybe your pool is very progressive in that regard but I have never seen a poster in any of the pools I used in the past.
And as to how everyone else fells... where do we draw the line? Maybe I feel offended that the guys in my pool don't shave their body hair. Should we have a policy for that too? Feelings are just feelings. Nobody has died from having them and most adults are capable of dealing with theirs without making it into a H&S issue.

ChampagneLassie · Yesterday 21:12

FourSevenFive · Yesterday 21:07

Totally normal to have just the swimming bottoms at that age.

One piece is just an absolutely unneccessary wet fabric (especially when going to the toilet and having to put it back on afterwards).

And, technically, the one piece is "sexualising" small girls the same way as bikini top does - it is an extra fabric covering upper torso which boys don't have to bother with, but girls for some mysterious reasons are supposed to.

Thankyou this is my thinking too

OP posts:
Rosecoffeecup · Yesterday 21:13

ChampagneLassie · Yesterday 20:45

I didn’t want a reaction, I want to make swimming as easy as possible. I was managing both kids on my own today. Getting them in and out of swimsuits is hard work! Now 4th old can do pants on her own. Many places sell them. I bought a 2 pack of girl bikini bottoms from H&M.

Those h&m pant sets all have a corresponding long sleeve top to buy too...

Octavia64 · Yesterday 21:13

21stNightOfSeptember · Yesterday 21:11

So should 4yo boys wear a type of swimwear that covers their torso too?

Lots of them seem to.

like a pp I grew up in the 80s and regularly swam wearing very little (as did the boys).

people are much much more aware of skin cancer these days and children of both sexes have one piece type swimsuits that cover a lot of skin.

it’s a lot easier than reapplying sun cream every 30 mins.

5682Jhd · Yesterday 21:13

I’m with you op, a child’s chest is in no way inappropriate boys or girls. I’d be very surprised if this was the swimming pool’s policy and is more than likely the opinion of this staff member.

Switcher · Yesterday 21:14

Whole country is basically full of lunatics. No other European country is like this.Yanbu.

ASandwichNamedKevin · Yesterday 21:14

Kingdomofsleep · Yesterday 20:49

And why would pulling their swimsuit off be inappropriate?

Can you not see your hypocrisy?

Seeing their bottom is inappropriate, for little girls or little boys

Seeing their nipples is not inappropriate, for little girls or little boys.

No hypocrisy.

Anyahyacinth · Yesterday 21:15

TY78910 · Yesterday 21:07

I don’t think she sexualised your DD, it draws attention. You bought a 2 pack bikini bottoms from H&M (designed to mix and match with tops) - I know the kind and they will 100% look like something is missing from the top. For that reason you were told to put a complete set on. It’s unnecessary attention drawing for other swimmers. You might think it’s all innocent and great and super convenient for you, but you don’t know how anyone else feels about that and that’s why the rules are there. What is the cut off point at which they say girls top now must go on? When breast tissue is 0.5cm raised and above? No - the rule must therefore apply to all girls to avoid nonsense arguments.

I took DCs swimming last weekend actually and they had a poster with pictures of what swimwear was permitted.

Meanwhile other threads on MN argue other countries have awful culture for women and the UK has achieved equality…but not for 4 year olds it seems…girls must cover themselves

TwinklyPeachMaker · Yesterday 21:15

A young girl at my kid's holiday club insisted on going topless. The club changed their policy overnight so that all children regardless of gender had to wear a swimming top. PITA for me as a mum of 2 boys who have never owned rash vests as my kids were then banned from the pool until I bought an item of clothing that was deemed to be a rash vest (apparently quick dry sports t shirts made of the same material weren't suitable 🙄)

Ifeelold48 · Yesterday 21:15

My kids have never gone swimming without a full swimsuit on. It would not even occur to me to not put a full swimsuit on them. As a victim of child SA ive talk them about what parts are private since they were little. I was being abused at 2.

ChampagneLassie · Yesterday 21:15

Anyahyacinth · Yesterday 21:09

You are arguing about by connecting it to sexualising things. Seriously sexualising children doesnt have anything to do with paedophiles. It’s a debate about mini me clothes etc..

It’s why pre puberty nipples must be hidden on girls not boys at 4. It’s restriction and difference. It’s inequality and sexualisation of girls

Thankyou this.

OP posts:
ToKittyornottoKitty · Yesterday 21:15

Switcher · Yesterday 21:14

Whole country is basically full of lunatics. No other European country is like this.Yanbu.

The drama 😅