That’s a remarkably convenient argument. Men everywhere do it, therefore we don’t need to examine whether different cultures, populations or circumstances produce different rates.
That isn’t an argument it’s a way of shutting down the conversation before the evidence can even be examined. And ‘some countries are just politer about it’ is particularly ridiculous — if you have no evidence for that, you’re simply inventing an explanation that makes your conclusion impossible to disprove.
What I find genuinely astounding is the lengths a lot of western women are prepared to go to in order to excuse or minimise concerns about unvetted men arriving in England, rather than simply accepting that safeguarding requires proper scrutiny of individuals, backgrounds and risks.
You can acknowledge that sexual coercion exists among Western men without pretending that every population, culture and social environment produces identical behaviours. Two things can be true at once. That’s called nuance — not racism, and not an excuse to stop asking legitimate safeguarding questions.
Honestly!!! I am astounded at this attitude amongst British women. I can only presume they’ve lived sheltered lives.