Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be upset about meat being cooked in my house

825 replies

Meetmeinlove · Yesterday 16:09

For context, I am 53 and a lifelong vegetarian. I have never cooked meat or eaten meat.

I was always clear with my kids that if they wanted to eat meat, it was their choice but it had to be out of the house. Put simply, I don’t want it in my house.

They both eat meat and I am ok with that.

But I came home and they have cooked it- used my wooden chopping board to cut it up. Left remnants on the worksurface.

i’m bloody upset and it feels so disrespectful frankly. It’s a real problem for me- I don’t want meat in my house- I have always been really clear about it.

aibu to be so upset about it? It’s a real problem for me.

OP posts:
Sereine · Today 08:35

Nobg · Yesterday 16:31

What is weird is that one Friday afternoon after always respecting your rule they suddenly
Get together and basically say “let’s cook up a meat storm and leave mum to find the remains of it”

which is weird

Edited

Are we sure this is the first time they've done it? Maybe they've just been better at clearing up previously.

Mumtobabyhavoc · Today 08:36

DearDenimEagle · Today 08:15

If humans had never eaten meat, we would not have evolved as we have. It’s the most efficient way of getting those elements of our dietary needs. We are animals. We are great apes and we fit into the system as predators. It’s nature. If we were meant to be herbivores , we would have 4 stomachs .And different teeth.

Due to a process of ‘encephalization’, humans have a larger brain size than would be expected for their body size. To sustain an expansively large brain, energetic compensation was required during hominin evolution. When examining individual organs, the brain mass surplus (and its energy requirement), is closely balanced by the reduction in size (and energy requirement) of the gastrointestinal tract. This is not surprising, considering the gut is the only organ that can sufficiently vary in size to offset the metabolic cost of a larger brain (Aiello and Wheeler, 1995). This process required a shift from a diet high in bulky plants of low digestibility (requiring voluminous fermentation chambers such as a rumen or cecum, or an extensive colon), to a higher-quality diet where foods are more energy dense and require less digestive processing. In temperate grass and woodland environments, this equates to an animal-derived protein-rich and fat-rich diet (Speth, 1989). Based on their digestive system, humans are classified as omnivores, falling between their frugivorous anthropoid relatives (e.g., chimpanzees) and true carnivores. With a simple stomach, relatively elongated small intestine, and reduced cecum and colon, the human gut is suggestive of reliance on a high-quality diet in which meat was predominant.

You've provided an article from a highly biased pro meat industry journal.
Interesting choice. 🤔

Are you the MEAT LOBBY? 🕵️

Humans today have evolved significantly and have a limitless array of foods to choose from (not talking about specific economic of geographic limitations) to survive.

I'm not anti-meat, btw. 😂
I do eat it. 😱

My post was about efficiency in protein bioavailability whey v meat and ease of preparation. Whey wins.
I was challenging the statement: that meat and fish are better, that's just a fact. 🙄
(Something like that)
It's not.
That's all. 💁‍♀️

Mumtobabyhavoc · Today 08:40

Lexibletheflexible · Today 08:34

Not everyone is vegetarian because they love animals and worry about ethical treatment. Some just dont eat meat because they don't like it or other cultural reasons.

Why is the OP a veggie? Has she said?

Or it doesn't occur to them to eat it.
I have three packages of ground bison and a duck in my freezer I keep forgetting about. 🤷‍♀️

Laura95167 · Today 08:42

FourSevenFive · Yesterday 23:56

So, the 14 yo can just decide to eat meat... where exactly? McDonalds? Corner kebab shop? Buy a shop made ham sandwich instead of making one at home? Much worse options for their health than having access to proper normally cooked meat at home.
14 yos don't typically have money and freedom to regularly visit a good restaurant.

Saying "no because I said so" won't lead to happy outcomes.

Is there a family member they can visit regularly and cook&eat meat there?
Maybe a small side fridge for cold meat like ham&bacon they could use for their packaged lunches regularly without cooking it at home?
Separate chopping board and time slot when they can cook at home - and properly clean after themselves?

The thing is meat isnt a human right. If this was alcohol or chocolate no-one would argue.

OP isnt forcing her vegetarianism on her children, or guilting them about eating meat, or refusing to eat in homes or restaurants that serve meat, she just doesnt want it in her home. And let's be honest, if its in her home it is impacting her because she was left it to clean up.

They dont need to eat meat but they wanted to, and yes McDs, meal out with family, friends homes, families homes, school dinners or... they could eat no meat. Lets face it they already access meat somewhere to know they like it, so its not been an issue previously.

In no other scenario would you be arguing a 14 year should have privileges to have something in the home the parent said no to. If OP didnt allow snacks in the house but accepted her 14 year old ate crisps with her friends you wouldnt say this is terrible get a crisp cupboard.

GentlePanda · Today 08:43

It’s their house too!
They should be allowed to eat meat at home but should prepare it properly and clean up after themselves

RamALamADingDong2 · Today 08:44

MumsTheWordYouKnow · Today 08:18

Rubbish. You can’t compare it to a nut allergy. I wouldn’t touch meat substitutes with a barge pole. Processed rubbish. They are old enough to know how they feel about meat consumption to make that decision. As long as they understand they do need to be respectful about cooking it and cleaning up that should be fine. It is their home too. This thing of saying ‘my house’ I have a real problem with. Very weird and sounds like parents from the olden days out of touch with their own children.

Well done, that's PRECISELY the point. They don't HAVE to cook meat substitutes or meat either. I'm saying both nuts and meat are just ingredients, and both are very easy to avoid.

The whole 'my house/our house/their house too' thing is silly to get stuck on doesn't reflect the spectrum of day-to-day life and family dynamics.

Imagine;

"The kids want to vape inside the house" - Well, it's their house too!
"The kids want to get a snake and keep it in the living room" - Well, it's their house too!
"The kids want to paint the hallway black" - Well, it's their house too!
"The kids want to play loud techno all day long" - Well, it's their house too!

It's nonsense. Obviously the kids live there, and it's a shared space, but there are certain understandings within each household that may or may not be appropriate for them. The kids will get their preferences in other ways, which may not suit the OP. (E.g. my son gets to keep certain paraphenalia of his interest on display. Do I like it? No. Is it my preference or choice? Absolutely not. But he loves it, and it's something we can easily do to support him).

In this case, the OP doesn't want meat in the house due to her principles; this has always been the case, and she is not stopping them from eating meat altogether. It's quite easy to respect her wishes.

Headinthecloudsfeetontheground · Today 08:44

Oh OP, I totally get it!

I was brought up to eat meat, not least because my paternal grandfather was a butcher so my family got meat very cheaply. I chose to become a vegetarian almost 40 years ago and my daughter chose the same. My son-in-law is vegetarian at home (and when visiting me) but eats meat when out. He would not DREAM of cooking meat (or fish) at home or in my house!

What meat-eaters don't realise is that, when meat is prepared, tiny particles of flesh and little splashes of blood fly into the air, landing on all kinds of surfaces. Then, when it's cooked, the same thing happens whether using the stove top, microwave, air fryer or oven. For a vegetarian, being expected to accept one's home being used in this way is somewhat akin to how a regular meat-eater would feel if their kitchen had been the scene of a murder. "Don't worry", says the SOC officer - "We think we've pretty much cleaned up all the victim's blood, flesh and bone fragments. You just carry on and cook your dinner."

FaceIt · Today 08:45

YABVU and selfish to your DCs

You are also depriving them of essential vitamins and minerals that cannot be replaced with a vegetarian diet.

Buy a chopping board and utensils for them to use and keep them separately to your cooking utensils.

Mumtobabyhavoc · Today 08:47

inickedthisname · Today 08:28

You do realise I am a vegetarian - I don’t need to be told that vegetarian children are not malnourished. I was raised vegetarian as I have already said. Of course I understand that it is about the ideology, not the food. I have also already said my vegetarianism is religious.

I have two DC. I let them eat meat. IMO, which the OP asked for, that means letting them have it in the house. My eldest (9) has already chosen to be vegetarian. My youngest is starting to show she doesn’t like the idea that meat is dead animals. I don’t sugar coat it, and I don’t push her to make the same choices as me. I think it’s likely she will follow her sister and give it up, of her own choice. If she doesn’t that will be her choice.

IMO, which, again, I will remind you that the OP asked for, it would be unreasonable to insist on my DC not eating the food they are allowed by me to eat in their own house. I think it is restrictive and controlling - not necessarily to their diet, but to their ability to choose for themselves. Especially where she has given them the choice to eat it.

It’s like saying they can wear certain clothes you don’t approve of but not in your house. Do you see where I’m coming from? A lot of people might agree with the ideals of the clothing choice the mother is making and a lot of people might not, but she’s not really accepting their choices if she pretends to give them the choice but doesn’t allow it in her home. She’s attempting to control their choices.

I'll refer you back to my previous post that you replied to.
However, I think I was rather condescending when I said, "You do realize...". 🙄😵‍💫
Sorry about that!

user9764325677 · Today 08:50

Meetmeinlove · Yesterday 16:21

Maybe it’s really hard for people who aren’t life long veggies to understand but that isn’t my view of meat.

My kids eat it and I never stopped them from doing that and gave them the choice themselves.

I just don’t want it cooked in my house.

Veggie here, not quite whole life but almost. I think you are being unreasonable, sorry. I have loads of veggie friends and none of them insist no meat in tne house.
Teens rebel, it’s part of their job description! And I think that is an unreasonable rule. It’s their house too.

strawberrybubblegum · Today 08:51

I do wonder how many people saying YABU would reply the same way if it was a religious restriction..

I suspect many of them would support you that it was perfectly reasonable for you to keep your house Halal or Kosher, and that your kids would just need to accept that whilst they lived at home. Many kids with religious parents even have to hide having a sneaky bacon sandwich outside the home - whereas you've said you're OK with your kids eating meat elsewhere.

I see absolutely no difference between a religious belief and your deeply held, long-term belief that eating meat isn't something you want to support, and your choice not to have it in your house.

Ask them what's going on. What did they think they were doing? It's OK to let them see that you're upset about this.

EmmaB1309 · Today 08:53

You can’t say you’re ok with them eating meat you just don’t want it in your house. In your mind you think that’s not you controlling their diet, but it is really, considering it’s their home and the place where they eat probably most of their meals! So where have they been eating it up till now? Only in cafes and restaurants and friends/relatives houses?
I think you should put down very clear boundaries about scrupulously washing surfaces and utensils and you yourself not having to handle meat. But you shouldn’t be insisting on no meat in what is their home as well, unless you want to drive them away as soon as they are old enough to leave home!

bert3400 · Today 08:54

Meetmeinlove · Yesterday 16:21

Maybe it’s really hard for people who aren’t life long veggies to understand but that isn’t my view of meat.

My kids eat it and I never stopped them from doing that and gave them the choice themselves.

I just don’t want it cooked in my house.

But it's their home too. You don't seem to understand, sometimes kids want to eat certain foods in their home . Yes it's your house but their HOME

inickedthisname · Today 08:58

Mumtobabyhavoc · Today 08:47

I'll refer you back to my previous post that you replied to.
However, I think I was rather condescending when I said, "You do realize...". 🙄😵‍💫
Sorry about that!

So that sounds like you’re saying “agree to disagree”?

MerryUmberHedgehog · Today 09:01

Or at least to clean up and pretend it didnt happen.

strawberrybubblegum · Today 09:01

Headinthecloudsfeetontheground · Today 08:44

Oh OP, I totally get it!

I was brought up to eat meat, not least because my paternal grandfather was a butcher so my family got meat very cheaply. I chose to become a vegetarian almost 40 years ago and my daughter chose the same. My son-in-law is vegetarian at home (and when visiting me) but eats meat when out. He would not DREAM of cooking meat (or fish) at home or in my house!

What meat-eaters don't realise is that, when meat is prepared, tiny particles of flesh and little splashes of blood fly into the air, landing on all kinds of surfaces. Then, when it's cooked, the same thing happens whether using the stove top, microwave, air fryer or oven. For a vegetarian, being expected to accept one's home being used in this way is somewhat akin to how a regular meat-eater would feel if their kitchen had been the scene of a murder. "Don't worry", says the SOC officer - "We think we've pretty much cleaned up all the victim's blood, flesh and bone fragments. You just carry on and cook your dinner."

This is a very good analogy.

I eat and enjoy meat, but I can easily see how horrifying it would be if it wasn't normalised through lifetime habit and social norms... and a certain wilful blindness.

I mean, just think about it without that 'normal' lens for a moment.

I wouldn't dream of preparing and cooking meat in the house of someone who saw meat as murder - which many vegetarians (reasonably) do, even if they're too polite to say it.

YANBU OP

Mumtobabyhavoc · Today 09:02

inickedthisname · Today 08:58

So that sounds like you’re saying “agree to disagree”?

I think you've got a good system for your home. 🙂

BlueDillieDillie · Today 09:04

They are your children not house mates or tenants that you interview and chose.
It is their home not merely a place where they sleep and watch tv. IT IS THEIR HOME. Cooking and eating meat is not putting you at risk, they are not doing anything dangerous. They are not driving you in a car at high speed or keeping dangerous pets. It is only your entitlement and control that is dented.
I think you have been very lucky to have imposed your draconian rules for so long without challenge.

Mumtobabyhavoc · Today 09:05

MerryUmberHedgehog · Today 09:01

Or at least to clean up and pretend it didnt happen.

🙈🙉🙊

Newstart3 · Today 09:05

Meetmeinlove · Yesterday 16:21

Maybe it’s really hard for people who aren’t life long veggies to understand but that isn’t my view of meat.

My kids eat it and I never stopped them from doing that and gave them the choice themselves.

I just don’t want it cooked in my house.

You keep saying my house my house my house. If their home too ! You can't ban them from eating something In their own home!

FourSevenFive · Today 09:05

Laura95167 · Today 08:42

The thing is meat isnt a human right. If this was alcohol or chocolate no-one would argue.

OP isnt forcing her vegetarianism on her children, or guilting them about eating meat, or refusing to eat in homes or restaurants that serve meat, she just doesnt want it in her home. And let's be honest, if its in her home it is impacting her because she was left it to clean up.

They dont need to eat meat but they wanted to, and yes McDs, meal out with family, friends homes, families homes, school dinners or... they could eat no meat. Lets face it they already access meat somewhere to know they like it, so its not been an issue previously.

In no other scenario would you be arguing a 14 year should have privileges to have something in the home the parent said no to. If OP didnt allow snacks in the house but accepted her 14 year old ate crisps with her friends you wouldnt say this is terrible get a crisp cupboard.

You said:
Its not like they cant have meat elsewhere. Your view dont seem to impact or restrict them so I think fair enough.

Which is a bit disingenious. You have school holidays now, we don't know how often this family eats out at places which serve meat. So they are left with McDonalds or not eating meat. Calling that no impact or restriction is absurd.

Catdoorman · Today 09:10

They are unreasonable to have used your wooden chopping board to cut up meat, you are unreasonable to have restricted their diet in their home for all of their young lives.

Tryagain26 · Today 09:12

Laura95167 · Today 08:42

The thing is meat isnt a human right. If this was alcohol or chocolate no-one would argue.

OP isnt forcing her vegetarianism on her children, or guilting them about eating meat, or refusing to eat in homes or restaurants that serve meat, she just doesnt want it in her home. And let's be honest, if its in her home it is impacting her because she was left it to clean up.

They dont need to eat meat but they wanted to, and yes McDs, meal out with family, friends homes, families homes, school dinners or... they could eat no meat. Lets face it they already access meat somewhere to know they like it, so its not been an issue previously.

In no other scenario would you be arguing a 14 year should have privileges to have something in the home the parent said no to. If OP didnt allow snacks in the house but accepted her 14 year old ate crisps with her friends you wouldnt say this is terrible get a crisp cupboard.

It depends what it was. If it was legal and not harmful then yes I would argue they should be allowed it. It's their home too, it seems as though they are being treated like lodgers though rather than family members.
If course they should clear up after themselves but that's a different issue. They should also use different utensils and pans but they can't do that because OP has banned all meat rather than come to a sensible arrangement that suits everyone

MumsTheWordYouKnow · Today 09:13

RamALamADingDong2 · Today 08:44

Well done, that's PRECISELY the point. They don't HAVE to cook meat substitutes or meat either. I'm saying both nuts and meat are just ingredients, and both are very easy to avoid.

The whole 'my house/our house/their house too' thing is silly to get stuck on doesn't reflect the spectrum of day-to-day life and family dynamics.

Imagine;

"The kids want to vape inside the house" - Well, it's their house too!
"The kids want to get a snake and keep it in the living room" - Well, it's their house too!
"The kids want to paint the hallway black" - Well, it's their house too!
"The kids want to play loud techno all day long" - Well, it's their house too!

It's nonsense. Obviously the kids live there, and it's a shared space, but there are certain understandings within each household that may or may not be appropriate for them. The kids will get their preferences in other ways, which may not suit the OP. (E.g. my son gets to keep certain paraphenalia of his interest on display. Do I like it? No. Is it my preference or choice? Absolutely not. But he loves it, and it's something we can easily do to support him).

In this case, the OP doesn't want meat in the house due to her principles; this has always been the case, and she is not stopping them from eating meat altogether. It's quite easy to respect her wishes.

Wow, you’re comparing eating food to that? Living in la la land.

Sweetdreamsbeautifulnightmare · Today 09:13

If they live with you it’s their house too. You can expect them to use their own utensils etc and to thoroughly clean up after themselves but to say they can’t eat it in your house or cook it seems extreme. How are they supposed to eat a varied diet if they can’t have meat when at home? Would you rather fast food out of the house?!

Swipe left for the next trending thread