Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Count Binface has a genuine chance against Nigel Farage!

549 replies

Justveryveryangry · Today 08:12

Sounds crazy but…

None of the major parties are competing…

Farage won Clacton with 46% of the vote…

If the 54% united together to vote for Binface, we could have the most preposterous election outcome of all time!

I reckon this could get some genuine momentum… all the other parties would LOVE this result, and even if they didn’t actively campaign for it, would surely quietly be gunning for Binface to win.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
LlynTegid · Today 18:15

ByGraptharsHammer · Today 18:08

Interesting moves from Count Binface. He has confirmed he will actively campaign and is seeking funds. Usually he just puts out videos and turns up to the count.

So an actual challenge, which is more than most would have expected.

If the by-election is on August 6th, it will get a lot more publicity than most, because there is little other news at that time of the summer.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · Today 18:16

ByGraptharsHammer · Today 18:02

It’s politics. Get over it. You want to say it’s exclusive to Labour. Unless you live under a rock or in another country then you will have seen many times before

That’s true. And I wouldn’t suppose any party to be better than another. But Labour does like to trumpet its ethical credentials, so all this stuff looks very hypocritical from them.

And to be fair to Farage his vanity by-election is only following Burnham’s, who has after all cost the taxpayer the Makerfield by-election and the Manchester mayoral election.

None of this takes away from Farage’s grubby antics.

Go Binface!

Toohotforwork · Today 18:16

BIossomtoes · Today 18:07

Have you had a look at Trump?

And how is that working out for him? It is sad so many people think senior civil servants shouldn't be appointed via a proper recruitment process. I would have thought we would have learnt from Starmer and Johnson.

Livinthedrama · Today 18:18

LauraNorda · Today 08:23

Is a joke MP really what the country needs right now?

They already have one.

Sweetsalad · Today 18:18

soddingspiderseason · Today 18:14

yada yada. This thread is about Binface and Farage. Sidetracking to take a swing at Burnham is distracting people from the important issues relating to 50p croissants and bringing back Ceefax.

Indeed. It's almost like they don't want the spotlight on Farage (and his worthy opponent)

concertinacornflake · Today 18:20

Toohotforwork · Today 18:00

Which is the very definition of cronyism.

Who else should do the job, who else would choose them? What is your alternative model?

Obviously civil service roles should be recruited but political appointments are political appointments.

concertinacornflake · Today 18:21

Toohotforwork · Today 18:16

And how is that working out for him? It is sad so many people think senior civil servants shouldn't be appointed via a proper recruitment process. I would have thought we would have learnt from Starmer and Johnson.

Senior civil servants ARE appointed through a recruitment process.

You're talking about political appointments. These are political appointments, the clue is in the name.

Toohotforwork · Today 18:21

Sweetsalad · Today 18:18

Indeed. It's almost like they don't want the spotlight on Farage (and his worthy opponent)

It's hard to comment at the moment though as Binface said he hasn't decided on his Clacton manifesto yet. He did say in Makerfield that he would move there if he won. I suspect he would want to go and visit Clacton first, to see if it as bad as everyone says, before making a similar commitment.

5128gap · Today 18:22

Justveryveryangry · Today 18:08

Your last sentence proved my point…. He knew he’d be rewarded…. Of course he will be. And this is politics and that just how it works - I have no problem with it.

There's a difference between reward and preventing detriment though, isn't there? I don't know the man's personal circumstances, but assuming he needs to earn a living, it would be understandable that he would want an alternative job. However, a job isn't a reward.
A reward suggests that he was offered something significantly better that he could have achieved had he not taken the action.
We don't know if this happened and never will, as whatever job Josh gets, we can't say he wouldn't have otherwise recieved it on merit.
People will of course, as whatever the man goes on to do, however able for his role he proves to be, people will claim its his 'reward'.

Uricon2 · Today 18:24

ByGraptharsHammer · Today 18:08

Interesting moves from Count Binface. He has confirmed he will actively campaign and is seeking funds. Usually he just puts out videos and turns up to the count.

So an actual challenge, which is more than most would have expected.

I donated and the £3 were and are coming in thick and fast.

I fail to see if he was a actual bin he would be worse for the people of Clacton and Jaywick, because the carpetbagger they elected last time seems to spend much time in the US sucking up to Trump and very little fighting for their interests.

Uricon2 · Today 18:25

5128gap · Today 18:22

There's a difference between reward and preventing detriment though, isn't there? I don't know the man's personal circumstances, but assuming he needs to earn a living, it would be understandable that he would want an alternative job. However, a job isn't a reward.
A reward suggests that he was offered something significantly better that he could have achieved had he not taken the action.
We don't know if this happened and never will, as whatever job Josh gets, we can't say he wouldn't have otherwise recieved it on merit.
People will of course, as whatever the man goes on to do, however able for his role he proves to be, people will claim its his 'reward'.

And of course, there was the possibility Andy B might not have won. Reform seemed to think they'd got it in the bag, until they hadn't.

pointythings · Today 18:29

soddingspiderseason · Today 18:14

yada yada. This thread is about Binface and Farage. Sidetracking to take a swing at Burnham is distracting people from the important issues relating to 50p croissants and bringing back Ceefax.

I mean if you want to complain about vetting and cronyism and the first and only party you look at is Labour, then you either aren't looking, don't want to look or both.

Toohotforwork · Today 18:30

5128gap · Today 18:22

There's a difference between reward and preventing detriment though, isn't there? I don't know the man's personal circumstances, but assuming he needs to earn a living, it would be understandable that he would want an alternative job. However, a job isn't a reward.
A reward suggests that he was offered something significantly better that he could have achieved had he not taken the action.
We don't know if this happened and never will, as whatever job Josh gets, we can't say he wouldn't have otherwise recieved it on merit.
People will of course, as whatever the man goes on to do, however able for his role he proves to be, people will claim its his 'reward'.

Lets not forget this is this guy we are talking about.

Labour minister Josh Simons resigns after falsely linking journalists to ‘pro-Kremlin’ network | Labour | The Guardian

If even the Guardian lay into you - we can be pretty sure he wasn't appointed on merit.

I'd appoint Binface over him anyday.

Labour minister Josh Simons resigns after falsely linking journalists to ‘pro-Kremlin’ network

Makerfield MP had been under pressure concerning thinktank’s commissioning of PR firm to investigate reporters

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/28/minister-josh-simons-resigns-labour-together

kaylot · Today 18:32

It would undermine the seriousness of politics and the issues the British public face. Sometimes im ashamed to be British and im ashamed for all the people who fought for this country

Toohotforwork · Today 18:34

pointythings · Today 18:29

I mean if you want to complain about vetting and cronyism and the first and only party you look at is Labour, then you either aren't looking, don't want to look or both.

The thing is that Labour said that they would do better. Johnson was terrible for it - just take Cummings.

Now we seem to have Labour supporters falling over each other to say,. Don't worry, no need for standards, everyone does it. Then try and shift attention away from their corruption to Farage who is obviously worse. It's like "well, as long as we aren't as bad a him, its all good".

TunnocksOrDeath · Today 18:34

Martin Bell stood as an independent in 1997 on a platform to remove Neil Hamilton who was mired in allegations of sleaze, and the other parties stood aside for him. Bell did a good job for one term then stepped down, as he'd promised to do in when he was elected. I see this as a very similar situation in effect, if not in intent.
Jonathan Harvey (Count Binface) has promised to do his best for the constituents if elected; he can't be much worse than the incumbent at any rate.

TooBigForMyBoots · Today 18:36

Uricon2 · Today 18:24

I donated and the £3 were and are coming in thick and fast.

I fail to see if he was a actual bin he would be worse for the people of Clacton and Jaywick, because the carpetbagger they elected last time seems to spend much time in the US sucking up to Trump and very little fighting for their interests.

I agree. From the footage I've seen Clacton has a bit of a litter problem which I'm sure all of the residents and local businesses would like rid of.

Vote Count Binface to take out the trash in Clacton.
🚮🗑🌞

nicepotoftea · Today 18:37

kaylot · Today 18:32

It would undermine the seriousness of politics and the issues the British public face. Sometimes im ashamed to be British and im ashamed for all the people who fought for this country

Farage's attempt to avoid scrutiny undermines the seriousness of politics and the issues the British public face.

If, as a result of his actions, binface is elected, then it's difficult to see how Clacton would be worse off.

Uricon2 · Today 18:38

kaylot · Today 18:32

It would undermine the seriousness of politics and the issues the British public face. Sometimes im ashamed to be British and im ashamed for all the people who fought for this country

I think NF with his ridiculous fake by election which was called by him to try to save his skin has done more to undermine the seriousness of politics than almost anyone else that comes to mind.

FAFO, Nigel.

Also, I can think of a few people who fought for this country who would have found this absolutely hilarious, my grandfather (WW1) for a start. He'd have voted Binface.

concertinacornflake · Today 18:40

Toohotforwork · Today 18:34

The thing is that Labour said that they would do better. Johnson was terrible for it - just take Cummings.

Now we seem to have Labour supporters falling over each other to say,. Don't worry, no need for standards, everyone does it. Then try and shift attention away from their corruption to Farage who is obviously worse. It's like "well, as long as we aren't as bad a him, its all good".

Edited

There was nothing wrong with how Cummings was appointed - he was a political appointment.There was a lot wrong with what happened in Downing Street after he was in post!!

Who do you imagine should be appointed to political roles?

Warmlight1 · Today 18:44

Toohotforwork · Today 18:34

The thing is that Labour said that they would do better. Johnson was terrible for it - just take Cummings.

Now we seem to have Labour supporters falling over each other to say,. Don't worry, no need for standards, everyone does it. Then try and shift attention away from their corruption to Farage who is obviously worse. It's like "well, as long as we aren't as bad a him, its all good".

Edited

It was Farage created this situation. Not labour. They are right to want nothing to do with it. He can explain himself to the electorate.

Whatafustercluck · Today 18:46

Uricon2 · Today 18:38

I think NF with his ridiculous fake by election which was called by him to try to save his skin has done more to undermine the seriousness of politics than almost anyone else that comes to mind.

FAFO, Nigel.

Also, I can think of a few people who fought for this country who would have found this absolutely hilarious, my grandfather (WW1) for a start. He'd have voted Binface.

Edited

Oh mine too. He was part of the liberation of Bergen Belsen, and knew all too well what men like Farage are capable of. He'd seen it first hand.

Toohotforwork · Today 18:48

Bin face is saying that he is going save £350,000 by not needing another bi-election. That's a familar number - he should put it on a bus!

Now that would be the most ironic bus in the world.

Count Binface has a genuine chance against Nigel Farage!
Warmlight1 · Today 18:48

Username19893847477374 · Today 18:06

I wouldn't, no. Relevance?

The relevance is any constituency would be lucky to get her.

BIossomtoes · Today 18:48

kaylot · Today 18:32

It would undermine the seriousness of politics and the issues the British public face. Sometimes im ashamed to be British and im ashamed for all the people who fought for this country

My bloke fought for this country and he thinks it’s hilarious and wants Binface to win. 🤷‍♀️